Visual Species Recognition and Mate Choice in Fur Seals: An Experimental Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Otariids and the Odobenid

Abstract

Most extant fur seal species have discrete breeding ranges, and it is assumed that prior to sealing they were even more separate. However, post sealing most populations have made dramatic recoveries and in the process of so doing have recolonized their previous ranges and possibly further afield. At three locations, Crozet Is., Macquarie Is. and Marion Is., subantarctic and Antarctic fur seals now breed sympatrically and produce hybrid offspring. Hybridization is rare in mammals with multiple barriers to gene exchange between species. At Îles Crozet hybridization between Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals is significantly less (~3%) than expected if random mating were occurring suggesting that one isolating mechanism may be traits by which females choose conspecific mates. Male subantarctic fur seals have a conspicuous pelage with creamy ventral surface, dark dorsal fur and a prominent sagittal crest, visually very distinct from other fur seals which are uniformly dark in color with no sagittal crest. We tested whether male pelage is a visual cue for species recognition by manipulating eight male subantarctic fur seals to make them resemble Antarctic fur seals and comparing their behavior and mating success with eight control males. Experimental male territories had significantly fewer females than control male territories, suggesting that females may choose conspecifics based on visual cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould JPY, Duck CD (1997) The cost and benefits of territorial tenure, and factors affecting mating success in male Antarctic fur seals. J Zool 241:649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24:546–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boness DJ, Anderson SS, Cox CR (1982) Functions of female aggression during the pup** and mating season of grey seals, Halichoerus grypus (Fabricus). Can J Zool 60:2270–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boness DJ, Bowen WD, Francis JM (1993) Implications of DNA fingerprinting for mating systems and reproductive strategies of pinnipeds. Zool Symp 66:61–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, Duck CD (1991) Mass change and metabolism of territorial male Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). Physiol Zool 64:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey PW (1991) Resource-defense polygyny and male territory quality in the New Zealand fur seal. Ethology 88:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc Roy Soc Lond B236:339–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox CR, Le Boeuf BJ (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francis JM, Boness DJ (1991) The effect of thermoregulatory behaviour on the mating system of the Juan Fernandez fur seal, Arctocephalus philippii. Behaviour 119:104–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy SD, Boness DJ, Fleischer RC (1999) Mate choice among sympatric fur seals: female preference for conphenotypic males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy SD, McKenzie J, Page B et al (2009) Fur seals at Macquarie Island: post-sealing colonisation, trends in abundance and hybridisation of three species. Polar Biol 32(10):1473–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt RG (1990) Maternal influences on pup survival and development in South American fur seal. PhD thesis, Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt R (1992) Maternal aggression in the South-American fur-seal in Peru. Can J Zool Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 70:320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath CB (1989) The behavioral ecology of the California sea lion. PhD, University of California, Santa Cruz

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr GJG, Bester MN, Jonker FC (1997) Changes in population sizes and distribution of fur seals at Marion Island. Polar Biol 17:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston JJ, Gwilliam J (2007) Hybridization between two sympatrically breeding species of fur seal at Iles Crozet revealed by genetic analysis. Conserv Genet 8(5):1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice on polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol and Syst 18:43–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroiwa MI, Majluf P (1989) Do South American fur seals in Peru lek? In: Abstracts of biennial conference for marine mammals. Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster ML, Bradshaw CJ, Goldsworthy SD et al (2007) Lower reproductive success in hybrid fur seal males indicates fitness costs to hybridization. Mol Ecol 16(15):3187–3197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster ML, Goldsworthy SD, Sunnucks P (2010) Two behavioural traits promote fine-scale species segregation and moderate hybridisation in a recovering sympatric fur seal population. BMC Evol Biol 10(1):143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn NJ, Boyd IL (1991) Pup**-site fidelity of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island South Georgia South Atlantic Ocean. J Mammal 72:202–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB et al (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1987) Sexual selection: a classification of models. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Dahlem workshop on sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann TS (1980) Territoriality and breeding behaviour of adult male Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. J Zool (Lond) 192:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann TS (1987) Male fur seal tenure. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) Status, biology, and ecology of fur seals. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NMFS, vol 51, pp 197–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller EH (1975) Social and evolutionary implications of territoriality in adult male New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri (Lesson, 1828), during the breeding season. Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour L’Exploration Scientifique de la Mer 169:170–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Page B, Goldsworthy SD, Hindell MA et al (2002) Interspecific differences in male vocalizations of three sympatric fur seals (Arctocephalus spp.). J Zool 258:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek MB (2000) The role of mating preferences in sha** interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav Process 51:111–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2011) Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition. Biol Lett 7:525–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara Frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1994) Mechanisms underlying sexual selection. In: Real LA (ed) Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 190–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Warneke RM (1971) Implications of a comparison of the airborne vocalizations and some aspects of the behaviour of the two Australian fur seals, Arctocephalus spp., on the evolution and present taxonomy of the genus. Aust J Zool 19:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trillmich F (1987) Galapagos fur seal, Arctocephalus galapagoensis. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) Status, biology, and ecology of fur seals. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NMFS 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa K (1981) Male quality and female choice of mate in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 62:922–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinclair, J.K., Goldsworthy, S., Guinet, C., Harcourt, R. (2021). Visual Species Recognition and Mate Choice in Fur Seals: An Experimental Study. In: Campagna, C., Harcourt, R. (eds) Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Otariids and the Odobenid. Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Marine Mammals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59184-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation