Abstract
Most extant fur seal species have discrete breeding ranges, and it is assumed that prior to sealing they were even more separate. However, post sealing most populations have made dramatic recoveries and in the process of so doing have recolonized their previous ranges and possibly further afield. At three locations, Crozet Is., Macquarie Is. and Marion Is., subantarctic and Antarctic fur seals now breed sympatrically and produce hybrid offspring. Hybridization is rare in mammals with multiple barriers to gene exchange between species. At Îles Crozet hybridization between Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals is significantly less (~3%) than expected if random mating were occurring suggesting that one isolating mechanism may be traits by which females choose conspecific mates. Male subantarctic fur seals have a conspicuous pelage with creamy ventral surface, dark dorsal fur and a prominent sagittal crest, visually very distinct from other fur seals which are uniformly dark in color with no sagittal crest. We tested whether male pelage is a visual cue for species recognition by manipulating eight male subantarctic fur seals to make them resemble Antarctic fur seals and comparing their behavior and mating success with eight control males. Experimental male territories had significantly fewer females than control male territories, suggesting that females may choose conspecifics based on visual cues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arnould JPY, Duck CD (1997) The cost and benefits of territorial tenure, and factors affecting mating success in male Antarctic fur seals. J Zool 241:649–664
Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24:546–559
Bateson P (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Boness DJ, Anderson SS, Cox CR (1982) Functions of female aggression during the pup** and mating season of grey seals, Halichoerus grypus (Fabricus). Can J Zool 60:2270–2278
Boness DJ, Bowen WD, Francis JM (1993) Implications of DNA fingerprinting for mating systems and reproductive strategies of pinnipeds. Zool Symp 66:61–93
Boyd IL, Duck CD (1991) Mass change and metabolism of territorial male Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). Physiol Zool 64:375–392
Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York
Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595
Carey PW (1991) Resource-defense polygyny and male territory quality in the New Zealand fur seal. Ethology 88:63–79
Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc Roy Soc Lond B236:339–372
Cox CR, Le Boeuf BJ (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Francis JM, Boness DJ (1991) The effect of thermoregulatory behaviour on the mating system of the Juan Fernandez fur seal, Arctocephalus philippii. Behaviour 119:104–126
Goldsworthy SD, Boness DJ, Fleischer RC (1999) Mate choice among sympatric fur seals: female preference for conphenotypic males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:253–267
Goldsworthy SD, McKenzie J, Page B et al (2009) Fur seals at Macquarie Island: post-sealing colonisation, trends in abundance and hybridisation of three species. Polar Biol 32(10):1473–1486
Harcourt RG (1990) Maternal influences on pup survival and development in South American fur seal. PhD thesis, Cambridge University
Harcourt R (1992) Maternal aggression in the South-American fur-seal in Peru. Can J Zool Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 70:320–325
Heath CB (1989) The behavioral ecology of the California sea lion. PhD, University of California, Santa Cruz
Hofmeyr GJG, Bester MN, Jonker FC (1997) Changes in population sizes and distribution of fur seals at Marion Island. Polar Biol 17:150–158
Kingston JJ, Gwilliam J (2007) Hybridization between two sympatrically breeding species of fur seal at Iles Crozet revealed by genetic analysis. Conserv Genet 8(5):1133
Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice on polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol and Syst 18:43–70
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38
Kuroiwa MI, Majluf P (1989) Do South American fur seals in Peru lek? In: Abstracts of biennial conference for marine mammals. Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp 36
Lancaster ML, Bradshaw CJ, Goldsworthy SD et al (2007) Lower reproductive success in hybrid fur seal males indicates fitness costs to hybridization. Mol Ecol 16(15):3187–3197
Lancaster ML, Goldsworthy SD, Sunnucks P (2010) Two behavioural traits promote fine-scale species segregation and moderate hybridisation in a recovering sympatric fur seal population. BMC Evol Biol 10(1):143
Lunn NJ, Boyd IL (1991) Pup**-site fidelity of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island South Georgia South Atlantic Ocean. J Mammal 72:202–206
Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB et al (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655
Maynard Smith J (1987) Sexual selection: a classification of models. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Dahlem workshop on sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 9–20
Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
McCann TS (1980) Territoriality and breeding behaviour of adult male Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. J Zool (Lond) 192:295–310
McCann TS (1987) Male fur seal tenure. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) Status, biology, and ecology of fur seals. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NMFS, vol 51, pp 197–198
Miller EH (1975) Social and evolutionary implications of territoriality in adult male New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri (Lesson, 1828), during the breeding season. Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour L’Exploration Scientifique de la Mer 169:170–185
Page B, Goldsworthy SD, Hindell MA et al (2002) Interspecific differences in male vocalizations of three sympatric fur seals (Arctocephalus spp.). J Zool 258:49–56
Ptacek MB (2000) The role of mating preferences in sha** interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav Process 51:111–134
Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2011) Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition. Biol Lett 7:525–527
Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara Frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ryan MJ (1994) Mechanisms underlying sexual selection. In: Real LA (ed) Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 190–215
Stirling I, Warneke RM (1971) Implications of a comparison of the airborne vocalizations and some aspects of the behaviour of the two Australian fur seals, Arctocephalus spp., on the evolution and present taxonomy of the genus. Aust J Zool 19:227–241
Trillmich F (1987) Galapagos fur seal, Arctocephalus galapagoensis. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) Status, biology, and ecology of fur seals. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NMFS 51
Yasukawa K (1981) Male quality and female choice of mate in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 62:922–929
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinclair, J.K., Goldsworthy, S., Guinet, C., Harcourt, R. (2021). Visual Species Recognition and Mate Choice in Fur Seals: An Experimental Study. In: Campagna, C., Harcourt, R. (eds) Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Otariids and the Odobenid. Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Marine Mammals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59184-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59184-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59183-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59184-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)