How Local Communities Can Align with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A Santa Cruz County Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in North American Cities

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

For local community indicator-driven programming, localizing international well-being standards, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), increases the capacity to connect, interact, and engage with systems at both the international level and the local, individual level. Making efforts to connect local communities to SDGs means more than just achieving these broader, international aims. It means incorporating best practices strategies into serving the youth, adults, households, and individuals that make up these local communities. These members are the most critical partners in connecting local communities to become more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable.

Currently, counties in California’s San Francisco Bay Area are working with their local communities to localize SDGs. Santa Cruz County, a small beach community on the central coast of the state, is one of these counties that is changing the way they engage with and connect to SDGs. This article uses Santa Cruz County as a case study to understand how to mainstream, incentivize, and meaningfully engage with SDGs at the local level. For the past two decades, Santa Cruz County has localized SDGs through implementation of a multi-sector approach, which includes a combination of tracking community wellbeing through a robust community assessment project, providing youth violence prevention programs, and releasing reports focused on youth wellbeing. These consistent efforts are supported by including applicable and measurable objectives and goals found at the local, state, and national levels. Examples of these efforts include: (1) Healthy People 2020, released by the US Department of Health and Human Services, is a series of goals that Santa Cruz County integrates into its community indicator programs, which benchmark local progress; and (2) County Health Rankings, under the auspices of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, provide an additional schema from which to improve and progress toward the frameworks discussed at the international level. Collectively, these programs facilitate Santa Cruz County’s continuous efforts toward achieving equity and eliminating disparities and ultimately creating social and physical environments that promote sustainable development standards for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The complete report is available at www.appliedsurveyresearch.org

  2. 2.

    Santa Cruz County. (2014). Economic Vitality Study.

  3. 3.

    Dean Runyan Associates, Inc. (2019). California Travel Impacts 2010-2018p.

  4. 4.

    Visit Santa Cruz County (VSCC). Tourism Facts. Accessed on July 26, 2016, from http://www.santacruzca.org/partners/tourism-facts.php

  5. 5.

    California Housing Partnership. (2018 September). Santa Cruz County’s Housing Emergency and Proposed Solutions.

  6. 6.

    NAEYC. A Call for Excellence in Early Childhood Education. Accessed on October 2, 2019, from https://www.naeyc.org/policy/excellence

  7. 7.

    University of California, Berkeley, Center for Labor Research and Education. Economic Impacts of Early Care and Education in California.

  8. 8.

    Heckman, James, The Life-cycle Benefits of an Influential early Childhood Program. Accessed on October 17, 2017, from https://heckmanequation.org/the-heckman-equation/

  9. 9.

    Search Institute. Accessed on August 2, 2016, from http://www.search-institute.org/research/developmental-assets

  10. 10.

    Search Institute. Accessed on August 2, 2016, from http://www.search-institute.org/research/developmental-assets

  11. 11.

    U.S. Department of Education. 2010. Diverse Learners.

  12. 12.

    U.S. Department of Education. 2010. Diverse Learners.

  13. 13.

    U.S. Department of the Treasury with the U.S. Department of Education. 2012. The Economics of Higher Education.

  14. 14.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011). National Healthcare Disparities and Quality Report. Washington, DC.

  15. 15.

    Billings, J., Bidman, A.B., Grumbach, K., et al. (1995). Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. Journal of American Medical Association, 274(4): 305–311.

  16. 16.

    ChildStats.gov. America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being. Usual Source of Health Care. 2015. http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/care2.asp. Accessed October 21, 2015.

  17. 17.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Child Health USA 2014. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014.

  18. 18.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020 objectives. Retrieved from http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=1

  19. 19.

    Bernstein J, Chollet D, Peterson S. How Does Insurance Coverage Improve Health Outcomes?. ISSUE BRIEF 2010. Available at: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/~/media/publications/pdfs/health/reformhealthcare_ib1.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2015.

  20. 20.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020. Healthy People 2020. Accessed on August 9, 2016, from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health

  21. 21.

    What is PedNSS/PNSS? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pedness/what_is/pnss_health_indicators.htm. Accessed October 2015.

  22. 22.

    Kaye K, Stewart Ng A. TEEN CHILDBEARING, EDUCATION, AND ECONOMIC WELLBEING. Why It Matters: Teen Childbearing, Education, and Economic Wellbeing 2012. Available at: https://thenationalcampaign.org/sites/default/files/resource-primary-download/childbearing-education-economicwellbeing.pdf. Accessed October 2015.

  23. 23.

    National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Why it matters: Teen pregnancy. 2012. Accessed November 2015 from: http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/why-it-matters/wim_teens.aspx

  24. 24.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020. Healthy People 2020. Accessed December 2015 from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/nutrition-and-weight-status

  25. 25.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight & Obesity. Healthy Food Environments. Accessed December 2015 from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/strategies/healthy-food-env.html

  26. 26.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health-Related Quality of Life. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/concept.htm

  27. 27.

    National Alliance to End Homelessness. Snapshot of Homelessness. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.endhomelessness.org/pages/snapshot_of_homelessness

  28. 28.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). The 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress.

  29. 29.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). The 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress.

  30. 30.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). The 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress.

  31. 31.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). The 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress.

  32. 32.

    American Psychological Association. Civic Engagement. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/civic-engagement.aspx

  33. 33.

    Gergen, Christopher. (2012, April 17). The Benefits of Civic Engagement for Tomorrow’s Leaders. Accessed September 2016 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/17/benefits-civic-engagement-tomorrows-leaders

  34. 34.

    Child Trends Data Bank. Neighborhood Safety. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=neighborhood-safety

  35. 35.

    Child Trends Data Bank. Neighborhood Safety. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=neighborhood-safety

  36. 36.

    California Department of Justice, Division of Law Enforcement, Bureau of Investigation and Intelligence. (2010). Organized Crime in California. Retrieved from: http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/publications/org_crime2010.pdf

  37. 37.

    Howell, J. C. (2007). Menacing or mimicking? Realities of youth gangs. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 58(2), 39–50. Retrieved from: http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/Content/Documents/Menacing-or-Mimicking.pdf

  38. 38.

    Juvenile Arrests Summary – Kidsdata.org. Kidsdata.org. Available at: http://www.kidsdata.org/topic/30/juvenile-arrests/summary#jump=why-important. Accessed November 23, 2015.

  39. 39.

    Prevent Juvenile Delinquency. Policy for Results 2015. Available at: http://www.policyforresults.org/youth/prevent-juvenile-delinquency. Accessed November 23, 2015.

  40. 40.

    Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Protection. Accessed September 2016 from http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/air/aq/health-and-env-effects-air-pollutions.pdf

  41. 41.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Air Quality. http://www.cdc.gov/air/

  42. 42.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Air Quality. http://www.cdc.gov/air/

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Brutschy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brutschy, S., Anderson-Ochoa, J., Connery, J., Maurillo, D.R. (2021). How Local Communities Can Align with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A Santa Cruz County Case Study. In: Abraham, D.B., Iyer, S.D. (eds) Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in North American Cities. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59173-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation