Cognitive Skills – Students with Additional Learning Needs and Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners
  • 1467 Accesses

Abstract

The SWANs cognitive skills instrument was developed in consultation with expert panels of special education teachers to measure the cognitive skills required by students to productively function in their learning environment. Teachers described the learning of 660 students with additional learning needs and ranging in age from 3 to 18 years and over. Students’ current level of proficiency in foundational learning skills, such as attention, memory and executive functioning, was observed and described on a survey by their classroom teachers. Using Rasch partial credit modelling (Masters G, Psychometrica 47:149174, 1982), analysis of person fit statistics suggested irregular patterns of teacher response to the survey items for students described as autistic (n = 257). The student sample was separated into those with an intellectual disability and those with autism spectrum disorder and the data reanalysed for these two groups of students. While there were overall similarities between the emergence of skills for each group, some specific areas of strengths and weaknesses for students with autism spectrum disorder became apparent. This suggested the possibility of reporting two different and interpretable progressions of cognitive skill development: one for students with an intellectual disability and one for those with autism spectrum disorder. This chapter discusses these results and how the analyses were used to build reports that allow teachers to consider their pedagogical practices and intervention plans for these students within a developmental learning paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. (1995). Quest [Computer software]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles-Janess, B., & Griffin, P. (2009). Map** transitions in interpersonal learning for students with additional needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6, 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009a). 2010 program for students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/healthwellbeing/wellbeing/disability/

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009b). Working towards level 1 of the Victorian essential learning standards. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/velslvl1.htm

  • Department of Human Services. (2009). Autism state plan. Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Accessed on 1st November, 2009 at http://autismstateplan.dhs.vic.gov.au/docs/autism_state_plan.pdf

  • Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombonne, E. (2001). Is there an epidemic of autism? Pediatrics, 107, 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gearheart, M., Pfotenhauer, J., Nagashima, S., Clark, S., Schwab, C., Vendlinski, T., Osmundson, E., Herman, J., & Bernbaum, D. (2006). Develo** expertise with classroom assessment in K-12 science: Learning to interpret student work. Educational Assessment, 11, 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, S., & Griffin, P. (2004). Using rubrics to recognise varying levels of performance. Training Agenda: A Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(2), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2007a). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2007b). Evidenced based teaching and curriculum shifts. Parkville, Australia: Assessment Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2009). Teachers’ use of assessment data. In C. M. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cummings (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., Gillis, S., & Calvitto, L. (2004). Connecting competence and quality: Scored assessment in year 12 VET. Melbourne, Australia: Assessment Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting: A new approach. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1994). Profiles and assessment. Curriculum Perspectives, 15(3), 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N., & Evans, J. (1986). A sense of direction in criterion-referenced assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12(3), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E., & Griffin, P. (2009). Profiling transitions in emotional development for students with additional learning needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee. (2002). Education of students with disabilities. Canberra, Australia: Senate Printing Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Auditor-General. (2007). Program for students with disabilities: Program accountability, PP No. 37, Session 2007–2008. Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1993). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 2: The fundamentals of defectology (abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2008). Profiling developmental pathways of communication and literacy for students with additional learning needs. National conference of the Australian Association for Special Education, Fremantle, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., Gustafson, J.-E., & Martin-Lof, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-squared fit values. Rash Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 21 September, 2009 on http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1998). ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [Computer software]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roberts, E., Griffin, P. (2020). Cognitive Skills – Students with Additional Learning Needs and Autism Spectrum Disorder. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation