Abstract
The SWANs cognitive skills instrument was developed in consultation with expert panels of special education teachers to measure the cognitive skills required by students to productively function in their learning environment. Teachers described the learning of 660 students with additional learning needs and ranging in age from 3 to 18 years and over. Students’ current level of proficiency in foundational learning skills, such as attention, memory and executive functioning, was observed and described on a survey by their classroom teachers. Using Rasch partial credit modelling (Masters G, Psychometrica 47:149174, 1982), analysis of person fit statistics suggested irregular patterns of teacher response to the survey items for students described as autistic (n = 257). The student sample was separated into those with an intellectual disability and those with autism spectrum disorder and the data reanalysed for these two groups of students. While there were overall similarities between the emergence of skills for each group, some specific areas of strengths and weaknesses for students with autism spectrum disorder became apparent. This suggested the possibility of reporting two different and interpretable progressions of cognitive skill development: one for students with an intellectual disability and one for those with autism spectrum disorder. This chapter discusses these results and how the analyses were used to build reports that allow teachers to consider their pedagogical practices and intervention plans for these students within a developmental learning paradigm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. (1995). Quest [Computer software]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Coles-Janess, B., & Griffin, P. (2009). Map** transitions in interpersonal learning for students with additional needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 141–150.
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6, 101–115.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009a). 2010 program for students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/healthwellbeing/wellbeing/disability/
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009b). Working towards level 1 of the Victorian essential learning standards. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/velslvl1.htm
Department of Human Services. (2009). Autism state plan. Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Accessed on 1st November, 2009 at http://autismstateplan.dhs.vic.gov.au/docs/autism_state_plan.pdf
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fombonne, E. (2001). Is there an epidemic of autism? Pediatrics, 107, 411–413.
Gearheart, M., Pfotenhauer, J., Nagashima, S., Clark, S., Schwab, C., Vendlinski, T., Osmundson, E., Herman, J., & Bernbaum, D. (2006). Develo** expertise with classroom assessment in K-12 science: Learning to interpret student work. Educational Assessment, 11, 237–263.
Gillis, S., & Griffin, P. (2004). Using rubrics to recognise varying levels of performance. Training Agenda: A Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(2), 22–24.
Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923–936.
Griffin, P. (2007a). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87–99.
Griffin, P. (2007b). Evidenced based teaching and curriculum shifts. Parkville, Australia: Assessment Research Centre.
Griffin, P. (2009). Teachers’ use of assessment data. In C. M. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cummings (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Griffin, P., Gillis, S., & Calvitto, L. (2004). Connecting competence and quality: Scored assessment in year 12 VET. Melbourne, Australia: Assessment Research Centre.
Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting: A new approach. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–496.
Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149174.
Masters, G. (1994). Profiles and assessment. Curriculum Perspectives, 15(3), 72–74.
Masters, G. N., & Evans, J. (1986). A sense of direction in criterion-referenced assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12(3), 257–265.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Roberts, E., & Griffin, P. (2009). Profiling transitions in emotional development for students with additional learning needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 151–161.
Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee. (2002). Education of students with disabilities. Canberra, Australia: Senate Printing Unit.
Victorian Auditor-General. (2007). Program for students with disabilities: Program accountability, PP No. 37, Session 2007–2008. Victorian Government Printer.
Vygotsky, L. (1993). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 2: The fundamentals of defectology (abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Boston: MIT Press.
Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2008). Profiling developmental pathways of communication and literacy for students with additional learning needs. National conference of the Australian Association for Special Education, Fremantle, Australia.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., Gustafson, J.-E., & Martin-Lof, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-squared fit values. Rash Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 21 September, 2009 on http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
Wu, M., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1998). ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [Computer software]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, E., Griffin, P. (2020). Cognitive Skills – Students with Additional Learning Needs and Autism Spectrum Disorder. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)