Anorectal Manometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • 1966 Accesses

Abstract

Anorectal manometry is considered a valuable test for diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. It is used to identify functional sphincter weakness, poor rectal compliance, and rectal sensation impairment. Anal resting pressure may be reduced in fecal incontinence, and dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter may be suspected in these patients. Maximal voluntary contraction is frequently impaired in incontinent patients, and this sign is related to external anal sphincter dysfunction. A significant decrease or loss of rectal sensation may contribute to fecal incontinence by impairing the recognition of impending defecation, and substantial decreases in rectal compliance are associated with urge fecal incontinence. The rehabilitative treatment of fecal incontinence is guided by anorectal manometry, and the algorithm for the multimodal rehabilitation is based on manometric reports. Furthermore, anorectal manometry can help to select candidates for overlap** sphincteroplasty and identifies those patients with rectal prolapse who are at high risk for postoperative incontinence, modifying the surgical strategy of simple correction of prolapse. In conclusion, anorectal manometry offers decisive data for understanding the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence and can modify the therapeutic strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miner PB. Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:S8–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:232–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AGA. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:732–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerreman R. The composition of anal basal pressure: an in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:118–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andromanakos N, Filippou D, Skandalakis P, et al. Anorectal incontinence. Pathogenesis and choice of treatment. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2006;15:41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nothmann BJ, Schuster MM. Internal anal sphincter derangement with anal fissures. Gastroenterology. 1974;67:216–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar D, Waldron D, Williams NS, et al. Prolonged anorectal manometry and external anal sphincter electromyography in ambulant human subjects. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:641–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Madoff RD, Orrom WJ, Rothenberger DA, et al. Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990;5:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, et al. Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Gut. 2005;54:546–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, et al. Relationship of symptoms in fecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10:152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bordeianou L, Kil Yeon L, Rockwood T, et al. Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the fecal incontinence severity index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1010–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raza N, Bielefeldt K. Discriminative value of anorectal manometry in clinical practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2503–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hallan RI, Marzouk DE, Waldron DJ, et al. Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg. 1989;76:973–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun WM, Donnelly TC, Read NW. Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography and sensation in determining the mechanism of “idiopathic” fecal incontinence. Gut. 1992;33:817–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uher EA, Swash M. Sacral reflexes. Physiology and clinical application. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1165–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eyers AA, Thomson JP. Pruritus ani: is anal sphincter dysfunction important in aetiology? BMJ. 1979;2:1549–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Pryde A, et al. Abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring. Br J Surg. 1994;81:603–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pucciani F, Bologna A, Rottoli ML, et al. Idiopathic faecal incontinence and internal anal sphincter dysfunction: role of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Tech Coloproctol. 1997;5:14–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wald A, Tunuguntia AK. Anorectal sensory motor dysfunction in fecal incontinence and diabetes mellitus. Modification with biofeedback therapy. N Engl J Med. 1984;10:1282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caruana BJ, Wald A, Hinds JP, et al. Anorectal sensory and motor function in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Comparison between multiple sclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:465–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miner PB, Donnelly TC, et al. Investigation of mode of action of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:1291–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozturk R, Niazi S, Stessman M, et al. Long-term outcome and objective changes of anorectal function after biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:667–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton C, Kamm MA. Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults – a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:1147–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pucciani F, Iozzi L, Masi A, et al. Multimodal rehabilitation for faecal incontinence: experience of an Italian centre devoted to faecal disorder rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:139–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S, et al. Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1552–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ternent CA, Shahidaran M, Blatchford GJ, et al. Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:462–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MRB. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg. 1989;76:64–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arroyo Fernández R, Avendaño Coy J, Ando Lafuente S, et al. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110(9):577–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simillis C, Lal N, Qiu S, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(5):645–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michelsen HB, Buntzen S, Krog K, et al. Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1039–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Basilisco G, Bharucha AE. High-resolution anorectal manometry: an expensive hobby or worth every penny? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(8):10.1111/nmo.13125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Pucciani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pucciani, F., Giani, I. (2021). Anorectal Manometry. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Sultan, A.H. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40861-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40862-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation