Abstract
In this chapter, we show how simulation gaming can be used to experiment freely in urban development and how a variety of urban stakeholders learn about these developments in a complex environment. Simulation gaming is especially useful when the issue is a problem in a complex multi-actor system, in which sociopolitical complexity and technical design complexity need to be studied in an integrated and dynamic fashion. The Go2Zero game about the energy transition process at the local level was used to illustrate learning about the energy transition process at the local level. Based on this study, we conclude that participants of Go2Zero particularly learned about the interaction between stakeholders, working together, and the dynamics of intervention of each individual stakeholder at the system level. This chapter also discusses the factors that are critical in making simulation gaming successful. These are: the validity of the game, clarity about the issue at stake, the role of the client and the facilitator, the right number of players in a session, the creation of a safe environment to experiment freely and share knowledge, and a fair gaming session.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bekebrede, G. (2010). Experiencing complexity: A gaming approach for understanding infrastructure systems. Delft, the Netherlands: Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.
Bekebrede, G. (2018). Simulating complex policy interventions in a ,simple‘ boardgame. Planspiele-Interaktion Gestalten: Über Die Vielfalt der Methode, 10, 25.
Bekebrede, G., Harteveld, C., Warmelink, H., & Meijer, S. (2013). Beauty or the beast: Importance of the attraction of educational games. In Student usability in educational software and games: Improving experiences (pp. 138–160). IGI Global.
Bekebrede, G., van Bueren, E., & Wenzler, I. (2018). Towards a joint local energy transition process in urban districts: The go2zero simulation game. Sustainability, 10(8), 2602.
Cityzen. (2018). www.cityzen-smartcity.eu.
Duke, R. D. (1974). Gaming: The future’s language. New York: Sage Publications.
Duke, R. D. (2000). A personal perspective on the evolution of gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 79–85.
Duke, R. D., & Geurts, J. L. A. (2004). Policy games for strategic management: Pathways into the unknown. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island press.
Harteveld, C. (2011). Triadic game design: Balancing reality, meaning and play. Springer.
Healey, P. (1998). Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Town Planning Review, 69(1), 1–21.
Herbert, A. (2010). Facilitator, researcher, politician, magician. Simulation & Gaming, 41(5), 681–693.
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order; how adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Huizinga, J. (1952). HOMO LUDENS; Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink.
International Energy Agency. (2016). Energy technology perspectives 2016.
Jasinski, M., & Thiagarajan, S. (2000). Virtual games for real learning: Learning online with serious fun. Educational Technology, 40(4), 61–63.
Klabbers, J. H. G. (2006). The magic circle: Principles of gaming & simulation. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Yersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Lukosch, H. K., Bekebrede, G., Kurapati, S., & Lukosch, S. G. (2018). A scientific foundation of simulation games for the analysis and design of complex systems. Simulation & Gaming, 49(3), 279–314.
Lukosch, H., Kurapati, S., Groen, D., & Verbraeck, A. (2016). Microgames for situated learning: A case study in interdependent planning. Simulation & Gaming, 47(3), 346–367.
Lukosch, H., van Bussel, R., & Meijer, S. A. (2013). Hybrid instructional design for serious gaming. Journal of Communication and Computer, 10(1), 1–8.
Mayer, I. (2008). Gaming for policy analysis. Learning about complex multi-actor systems. Why do Games Work, 31–40.
Mayer, I. S. (2009). The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: A review. Simulation Gaming, 40(6), 825–862.
Mayer, I. S., & Bekebrede, G. (2006). Serious games and ‘simulation based e-learning’ for infrastructure management, the future of learning. In Affective and emotional aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 136–151). (Game-Based and Innovative Learning Approaches), IOS Press.
Mayer, I. S., & Kleistra, Y. (2009). Spelsimulaties’ revisited’: Serious gaming in de publieke sector. Bedrijfskunde, 3, 2009.
Mayer, I. S., & Veeneman, W. (2002). Games in a world of infrastructures simulation-games for research. Delft, Eburon: Learning and Intervention.
Meijer, S. (2015). The power of sponges: Comparing high-tech and low-tech gaming for innovation. Simulation & Gaming, 46(5), 512–535.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Olejniczak, K., Wolański, M., & Widawski, I. (2018). Regulation crash-test: Applying serious games to policy design. Policy Design and Practice, 1(3), 194–214.
Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming, 29(1), 20–30.
Portugali, J. (2012). Complexity theories of cities: First, second or third culture of planning. In G. d. Roo, J. Hillier & J. V. Wezemael (Eds.), Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations (pp. 117–140). Farnham, U.K. and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing.
Raser, J. R. (1969). Simulations and society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Van den Dobbelsteen, A., Martin, C., Keeffe, G., Pulselli, R., & Vandevyvere, H. (2018). From problems to potentials—The urban energy transition of Gruž, Dubrovnik. Energies, 11(4), 922.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bekebrede, G. (2020). Urban Gaming: Learning About the Energy Transition at the Local Level with Go2Zero. In: van den Dool, L. (eds) Strategies for Urban Network Learning. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36047-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36048-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)