Re-Doing Research: Best Practices for Asking About Gender and Sexuality in Education Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education ((GED))

Abstract

This book chapter proposes re-doing research on gender and sexuality (G&S) in education in more inclusive ways. It explains best-practice guidelines developed for a 2018 UNESCO technical brief used for advising governments and transnational survey directors on the monitoring of violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex (SOGIE) status and education sectors’ responses. It details the development of the key standard questions; points to the complications of cultural and other differences and outlines the importance of considering violence alongside more affirming topics. It argues these best practices necessarily have a shelf life and should continually be ‘re-done’ over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNESCO. Out in the open: Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. UNESCO. Call for action by ministers: Inclusive and equitable education for all learners in an environment free from discrimination and violence. Paris: UNESCO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown T, Herman J, Park A. Exploring international priorities and best practices for the collection of data about gender minorities, report of meeting. Los Angeles: Williams Institute; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haas AP, Eliason M, Mays VM, Mathy RM, Cochran SD, D’Augelli AR, et al. Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations. Journal of Homosexuality. 2011;58(1):10–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SMART. Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys. Los Angeles: Williams Institute; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pinheiro PS. UN world report on violence against children. Geneva: United Nations Secretary General’s Study on Violence Against Children; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones T. The needs of students with intersex variations. Sex Education [Internet]. 2016;16(6):602–18. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681811.2016.1149808?journalCode=csed20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UNESCO. Insult to inclusion: Asia-Pacific report on school bullying, violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Bangkok: UNESCO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. UNESCO. Reaching out vol 2: Preventing and addressing SOGIE-related school violence in Viet Nam. Paris Ha Noi and Bangkok: UNESCO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  10. UNESCO. Reaching out vol 1: Preventing and addressing school-related gender-based violence in Viet Nam. Paris Ha Noi and Bangkok: UNESCO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plan International Thailand, International Center for Research on Women. Are schools safe and equal places for girls and boys in Asia? Research findings on school-related gender-based violence. Bangkok: Plan International; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Park A, Halawi F. Lack of equal treatment and access to equal opportunity for LGTBQ people in the United States: Submission to the United Nations Universal Periodic Review of United States of America. Los Angeles: Williams Institute; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith E, Jones T, Ward R, Dixon J, Mitchell A, Hillier L. From blues to rainbows: The mental health and well-being of gender diverse and transgender young people in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex Health and Society; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell ST, Ryan C, Toomey R, Diaz RM, Sanchez J. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescent school victimization: Implications for young adult health and adjustment. Journal of School Health. 2011;81(5):223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. METRO. Youth chances survey of 16–25 year olds: First reference report. London: METRO Youth Chances; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PNUD. Informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos de las mujeres trans en El Salvador. San Salvador: PNUD y Procuraduría para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones T, Hillier L. Comparing trans-spectrum and same-sex attracted youth: Increased risks, increased activisms. LGBT Youth. 2013;10(4):287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Formby E. The impact of homophobic and transphobic bullying on education and employment: A European survey. Sheffield: IGLYO and Sheffield Hallam University; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones T, Smith E, Ward R, Dixon J, Hillier L, Mitchell A. School experiences of transgender and gender diverse students in Australia. Sex Education. 2016;16(2):156–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosciw J, Greytak EA, Palmer N, Boesen M. The 2013 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. UNESCO. Bullying targeting secondary school students who are or are perceived to be transgender or same-sex attracted: Types, prevalence, impact, motivation and preventive measures in 5 provinces of Thailand. 2014. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002275/227518e.pdf.

  22. Jones T, Hart B, Carpenter M, Ansara G, Leonard W, Lucke J. Intersex: Stories and statistics from Australia. London: Open Book Publisher; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. UNESCO, editor. Education sector responses to homophobic bullying. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hillier L, Jones T, Monagle M, Overton N, Gahan L, Blackman J, et al. Writing themselves in 3: The third national study on the sexual health and wellbeing of same-sex attracted and gender questioning young people. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Badgett MV, Nezhad S, Waaldijk K, van der Meulen Rodgers Y. The relationship between LGBT inclusion and economic development: An analysis of emerging economies. Los Angeles: Williams Institute; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Choi S, Wilson B, Shelton J, Gates G. Serving our youth 2015: The needs and experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth experiencing homelessness. Los Angeles: Williams Institute with True Colors Fund; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuyper L. Young people and sexual orientation: Summary and discussion. The Hague: The Dutch Institute for Social Research; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. CDC. Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-risk behaviors among students in grades 9–12: Youth risk behavior surveillance, selected sites, United States, 2001–2009. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gahan L, Jones T, Hillier L. An unresolved journey: Religious discourse and same-sex attracted and gender questioning young people. The Social Scientific Study of Religion. 2014;25(1):202–29.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor C, Peter T. Every class in every school: Final report on the first national climate survey on homophobia, biphobia and transphobia in Canadian schools. Toronto: EGALE and Canada Human Rights Trust; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jones T. Policy and gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex students. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cavaria. National report on homophobic attitudes and stereotypes among young people in Belgium. Belgium: NISO Project; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schnoonacker M, Dumon E. WELEBI: Onderzoek naar het mentaal en sociaal welbevinden van lesbische en biseksuele meisjes. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Makuchowska M, M. P. Situation of LGBT persons in Poland: 2010 and 2011 report. Warsaw: Kampania Przeciw Homofobii; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bostwick W, Meyer IH, Aranda F, Russell ST, Hughes T, Birkett M, et al. Mental health and suicidality among racially/ethnically diverse sexual minority youths. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(6):1129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Committee on LGBT Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Youth Coalition, COJESS México, Eneache. Primera encuesta nacional sobre bullying homofóbico. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cahill S, Makadon H. If they don’t count us, we don’t count: Trump administration rolls back sexual orientation and gender identity data collection. LGBT Health. 2017;4(3):171–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. National LGBTI Health Alliance. Making the count: Addressing data integrity gaps in Australian standards for collecting sex and gender information. Sydney: National LGBTI Health Alliance; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kuyper L, de Wit J, Adam P, Woertman L. Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2012;41(1):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9780-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones T. How sex education research methodologies frame GLBTIQ students. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning. 2013;13(6):687–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones T, Hillier L. The Australian context: Turning research into policies, policies into research. In: Horn S, editor. Sexual orientation, gender identity, and schooling: The nexus of research, practice and policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. pp. 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  43. The GenIUSS Group. Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys. Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sell RL. Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1997;26(6):643–57.

    Google Scholar 

  45. United Nations. End violence and harmful medical practices on intersex children and adults, UN and regional experts urge. Geneva [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=20739&LangID=E. 26 October 2016.

  46. United Nations. Born free and equal: Sexual orientation and gender identity in international human rights law. New York and Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  47. UN Secretary-General. Message to event on ending violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11717&LangID=E.

  48. UNESCO. Rio statement on homophobic bullying and education for all. Rio de Janiero, Brazil: UNESCO; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  49. UNESCO. Review of homophobic bullying in educational institutions. Paris: UNESCO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Winter S. Lost in transition: Transgender people, rights and HIV vulnerability in the Asia-Pacific region. Bangkok: United Nations Development Programme; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Standard for sex and gender variables. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bauer G, Braimoh J, Scheim A, Dharma C. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Australian Government. Guidelines on the recognition of sex and gender. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Keuzenkamp S, Kuyper L. Acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals in the Netherlands 2013. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  55. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Remafedi G, Resnick MD, Blum R. Demography of sexual orientation in adolescents. Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):714–21.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Russell ST, Joyner K. Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91(8):1276–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hillier L, Warr D, Haste B. The rural mural: Sexuality and diversity in rural youth. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Sexually Transmissible Diseases, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Reis E, Saewyc E. 83,000 youth: Selected findings of eight population-based studies as they pertain to anti-gay harassment and the safety and well-being of sexual minority students. Seattle: Safe Schools Coalition; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Peters L, Murphy A, Tonkin R, Milner R, Cox D. Adolescent health survey: Province of British Columbia. Burnaby: The McCreary Centre Society; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Haseldon L, Joloza T. Measuring sexual orientation: A guide for researchers. London: Office for National Statistics; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hunt R, Jensen J. The school report: The experiences of young gay people in Britain’s schools. London: Stonewall, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Caceres C, Silva-Santisteban A, Salazar X, Cuadros J, Olivos F, Segura E. Informe final: Estudio a través de Internet sobre ‘Bullying’, y sus manifestaciones homofóbicas en escuelas de Chile, Guatemala, México y Perú, y su impacto en la salud de jóvenes varones entre 18 y 24 años. Lima: Instituto de Estudios en Salud, Sexualidad y Desarrollo Humano and Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia en colaboración con la Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mian L. Bei**g: Aibai Culture & Education Center. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Human Rights Watch. The nail that sticks out gets hammered down: LGBT bullying and exclusion in Japanese schools. Tokyo: Human Rights Watch, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Clark TC, Lucassen M, Bullen P, Denny S. The health and well-being of transgender high school students: Results from the New Zealand adolescent health survey. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014;55(1):93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McNameea H, Lloydb K, Schubotzb D. Same sex attraction, homophobic bullying and mental health of young people in Northern Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies. 2008;11(1):33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pathela P, Hajat A, Schillinger J, Blank S, Sell RL, Mostashari F. Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: A population-based survey of New York City men. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;145(1):416–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Saewyc E, Bauer G, Skay C, Bearinger L, Resnick MD, Reis E, et al. Measuring sexual orientation in adolescent health surveys: Evaluation of eight school-based surveys. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004;35(345):e.1–e.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Cimpian J. Classification errors and bias regarding research on sexual minority youths. Educational Researcher. 2017;46(9):517–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Cochran SD, Mays VM. Lifetime prevalence of suicide symptoms and affective disorders among men reporting same-sex sexual partners: Results from NHANES III. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;90(4):573–8.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Herdt G, McClintock M. The magical age of 10. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2000;29(6):586–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Halperin DM. Thirteen ways of looking at a bisexual. Journal of Bisexuality. 2009;9(3):451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. American Psychological Association. Sexual orientation and homosexuality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Website; 2011. 18 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  75. SIECUS. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth issues. New York: Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Satcher D. The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. Rockville: Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH. A sociological perspective on sexual action. In: Parker RG, Gagnon JH, editors. Conceiving sexuality: Approaches to sex research in a postmodern world. New York: Routledge; 1995. pp. 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Saewyc E, Homma Y, Skay C, Bearinger L, Resnick MD, Reis E. Protective factors in the lives of bisexual adolescents in North America. American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99(1):110–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Statistics New Zealand. Statistical standard for gender identity. Christchurch: Statistics New Zealand; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  80. U.S. Government. National inmate survey. Washington, DC: Conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and RTI International; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Clark TC, Fleming T, Bullen P, Denny S, Crengle S, Dyson B, et al. Youth’12 overview: The health and wellbeing of New Zealand secondary school students in 2012. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kosciw J. The 2003 national school climate survey: The school-related experiences of our nation’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. New York: Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Jones T, del Pozo de Bolger A, Dunne T, Lykins A, Hawkes G. Female-to-Male (FtM) transgender people’s experiences in Australia. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Van Caenegem E, Wierckx K, Elaut E, Buysse A, Dewaele A, Van Nieuwerburgh F, et al. Prevalence of gender nonconformity in Flanders, Belgium. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2015;44(5):1281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Martin C, Ruble D. Patterns of Gender Development. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;61(1):353–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Olson K, Key A, Eaton N. Gender cognition in transgender children. Psychological Science. 2015;26(4):467–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Outright Action International. Human rights report: Being transgender in Iran. New York: Outright Action International; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Dreger A. Galileo’s middle finger: Heretics, activists, and the search for justice in science. New York: Penguin Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Davis G. Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ediati A, Juniarto AZ, Birnie E, Drop SL, S, Faradz SM, et al. Gender development in Indonesian children, adolescents, and adults with disorders of sex development. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2015;44(5):1339–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Achermann JC, Domenice S, Bachega TA, Nishi MY, Mendonca BB. Disorders of sex development: Effect of molecular diagnostics. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2015;11(8):478–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ekenze S, Nwangwu E, Amah C, Agugua-Obianyo N, Onuh A. Disorders of sex development in a develo** country. Pediatric Surgery International. 2015;31(1):93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mutlu GY, Kirmizibekmez H, Aydin H, Çetiner H, Moralioglu S. Pure gonadal dysgenesis (Swyer syndrome) due to microdeletion in the SRY gene. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;28(1–2):207–10.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Henningham M, Jones T. Cut it out: Rethinking surgical intervention on intersex infants. In: Jones T, editor. Bent Street. Melbourne: Clouds of Magellan; 2017. pp. 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Davis G. Normalizing intersex: The transformative power of stories. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics. 2015;5(2):87–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Gül IG, Sayar GH, Özten E, Eryilmaz G. The phenomenology of delusions in a patient with disorders of sex development. Noro-Psikyatri Arsivi. 2015;52(2):198–9.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ahmed SM, Fadl-Elmula I. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characterization of disorders of sexual development 6 (DSD) in Sudan. Genomics and Applied Biology. 2016;6(8):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Camats N, Fernández-Cancio M, Audí L, Mullis PE, Moreno F. Human MAMLD1 Gene Variations Seem Not Sufficient to Explain a 46, XY DSD Phenotype. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Oliveira MdS, de Paiva-e-Silva RB, Guerra-Junior G, Maciel-Guerra AT. Parents’ experiences of having a baby with ambiguous genitalia. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;28(7–8):833–8.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Paula GB, Ribeiro Andrade JG, Guaragna-Filho G, Sewaybricker LE, Miranda ML. Ovotesticular disorder of sex development with unusual karyotype: Patient report. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;28(5–6):677–80.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Dwyer A, Ball M, Barker E. Policing LGBTIQ people in rural spaces: Emerging issues and future concerns. Rural Society. 2015;24(3):227–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Howard J. The Joneses: Portraits and location stills. Southern Quarterly. 2015;52(4):155–64.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Grimes KM. Theology of whose body? Sexual complementarity, intersex conditions, and La Virgen de Guadalupe. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 2016;32(1):75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Regmi E. Stories of intersex people from Nepal. Kathmandu: Organisation Intersex International; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rubin DA. Provincializing intersex: US intersex activism, human rights, and transnational body politics. Frontiers. 2015;36(3):51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Kalra B, Baruah M, Kalra S. Endocrinology and art: The Mahabharata and reproductive endocrinology. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2016;20(3):404–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. US Department of Education. Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2015 school crime supplement to the national crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  108. CDC. School policy and environment school questionnaire. Atlanta: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  109. California Safe Schools Coalition, 4-H Centre for Youth Development. Consequences of harassment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation and gender non-conformity and steps for making schools safer. Davis: University of California, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Szalacha L. Safer sexual diversity climates: Lessons learned from an evaluation of Massachusetts safe schools program for gay and lesbian students. American Journal of Education. 2003;110(1):58–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Mitchell M, Gray M, Beninger K. Tackling homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying among school-age children and young people: Findings from a mixed method study of teachers, other providers and pupils. London: Government Equalities Office; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Jones T. Researching & Working for transgender youth: Contexts, problems and solutions. Social Sciences. 2016;5(3):43.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Poteat P, Yoshikawa H, Calzo J, Russell S, Horn S. Gay-straight alliances as settings for youth inclusion and development: Future conceptual and methodological directions for research on these and other student groups in schools. Educational Researcher. 2017;46(9):508–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Mayo C. Queer and trans youth, relational subjectivity, and uncertain possibilities: Challenging research in complicated contexts. Educational Researcher. 2017;46(9):530–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, T. (2019). Re-Doing Research: Best Practices for Asking About Gender and Sexuality in Education Studies. In: Jones, T., Coll, L., van Leent, L., Taylor, Y. (eds) Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24205-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24205-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24204-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24205-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation