Quantifying Media Influence and Partisan Attention on Twitter During the UK EU Referendum

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2018)

Abstract

User generated media, and their influence on the information individuals are exposed to, have the potential to affect political outcomes. This is increasingly a focus for attention and concern. The British EU membership referendum provided an opportunity for researchers to explore the nature and impact of the new infosphere in a politically charged situation. This work contributes by reviewing websites that were linked in a Brexit Tweet dataset of 13.2 million tweets, by 1.8 million distinct users, collected in the run-up to the referendum. In this dataset, 480,000 users have been classified according to their “Brexit” vote intent. Findings include that linked material on Twitter was mostly posted by those in favour of leaving the EU. Mainstream news media had the greatest impact in terms of number of links tweeted, with alternative media and campaign sites appearing to a much lesser extent. Of the 15 most linked mainstream media, half show a substantially greater appeal to the leave camp, with two of them very much so. No mainstream media had a consistent appeal among remain supporters. Among the sites that were highly favoured by one voter valence or the other, the leave sites had by far the greatest impact in terms of number of appearances in tweets. Remain-preferred sites were less linked, and dominated by explicit campaign sites. Leave-preferred sites were more numerously linked, and dominated by mainstream and alternative media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/02/guardian-view-russian-propaganda-truth-out-there.

  2. 2.

    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~genevieve/publications-materials/brexit-domains-shared-materials.ods.

  3. 3.

    http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/03/16/more-positive-assertive-and-forward-looking-how-leave-won-twitter/.

  4. 4.

    https://cloud.gate.ac.uk/shopfront/displayItem/twitter-collector.

  5. 5.

    https://gate.ac.uk/.

  6. 6.

    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~genevieve/publications-materials/brexit-domains-shared-materials.ods.

  7. 7.

    http://www.brndstr.com/.

  8. 8.

    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~genevieve/publications-materials/brexit-domains-shared-materials.ods.

  9. 9.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/which-newspapers-support-brexit_uk_5768fad2e4b0a4f99adc6525.

  10. 10.

    http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/nrs-national-press-readership-data-telegraph-overtakes-guardian-as-most-read-quality-title-in-printonline/.

References

  1. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barberá, P., Rivero, G.: Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(6), 712–729 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastos, M.T., Mercea, D.: The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., Benkler, Y.: Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: online media and the 2016 US presidential election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrara, E.: Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22(8) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins, K.: Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed. Nature News 540(7631), 9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howard, P.N., Bolsover, G., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S., Neudert, L.M.: Junk news and bots during the US election: what were Michigan voters sharing over Twitter? Technical report, Data Memo 2017.1. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howard, P.N., Bradshaw, S., Kollanyi, B., Bolsolver, G.: Junk news and bots during the French presidential election: what are French voters sharing over Twitter in round two? Technical report, Data Memo 2017.4. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Howard, P.N., Kollanyi, B.: Bots, #strongerin, and #brexit: computational propaganda during the UK-EU referendum. Technical report, Working Paper 2016.1. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaminska, M., Kollanyi, B., Howard, P.N.: Junk news and bots during the 2017 UK general election: what are UK voters sharing over Twitter? Technical report, Data Memo 2017.5. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kollanyi, B., Howard, P.N.: Junk news and bots during the German federal presidency election: what were German voters sharing over Twitter? Technical report, Data Memo 2017.2. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lansdall-Welfare, T., Dzogang, F., Cristianini, N.: Change-point analysis of the public mood in UK Twitter during the Brexit referendum. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 434–439. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mangold, L.: Should I stay or should I go: clash of opinions in the Brexit Twitter debate. Computing 1(4.1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maynard, D., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M.A., Rout, D., Bontcheva, K.: A framework for real-time semantic social media analysis. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 44, 75–88 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore, M., Ramsay, G.: UK media coverage of the 2016 EU referendum campaign. King’s College London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Narayanan, V., Howard, P.N., Kollanyi, B., Elswah, M.: Russian involvement and junk news during Brexit. Technical report, Data Memo 2017.10. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neudert, L.M., Kollanyi, B., Howard, P.N.: Junk news and bots during the German parliamentary election: what are German voters sharing over Twitter. Technical report, Data Memo 2017.7. Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., Liu, Y., Hopkins, D., Ungar, L.: Beyond binary labels: political ideology prediction of Twitter users. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). vol. 1, pp. 729–740 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silverman, C.: Lies, damn lies and viral content. Technical report, Tow Center for Digital Journalism (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skjeseth, H.T.: All the president’s lies: media coverage of lies in the US and France. Technical report, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the European Union under grant agreements No. 687847 “Comrades” and No. 654024 “SoBigData”, the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant EP/I004327/1 and the British Academy under call “The Humanities and Social Sciences Tackling the UKs International Challenges”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genevieve Gorrell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Most Linked Websites

A Most Linked Websites

See Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. PAS > 3:1 Sites and Sites with Neutral Appeal
Table 3. PAS > 30:1 Sites

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gorrell, G., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M.A., Bakir, M.E., Iavarone, B., Bontcheva, K. (2018). Quantifying Media Influence and Partisan Attention on Twitter During the UK EU Referendum. In: Staab, S., Koltsova, O., Ignatov, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01128-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01129-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation