Europe: Beyond the Canon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Archaeological Praxis

Part of the book series: Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice ((ETHARCHAEOL,volume 1))

  • 1188 Accesses

Abstract

The inception of widely shared codes of practice for archaeologists throughout Europe in the last decades has undoubtedly contributed to enhance our daily practice, both scientifically and ethically. The next challenge ahead, if we are to both face the old and new multicultural circumstances and productively renovate our research goals and agendas, is to destabilize and dismantle in a deliberate way the “universal” components of our theoretical conceptions. We must approach and consent the up to now demonized “other” archaeologies in our society, represented by local people, “pseudoarchaeologists,” looters and private collectors, immigrants, and so forth. In conversing and learning from them we not only would fairly acknowledge our societal variety but also will enrich our visions of the past and eventually be better prepared for the ongoing combat with the true menace to a socially productive archaeology, which comes from a destructive, ultraliberal capitalist activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    (http://e-a-a.org/codes.htm; http://new.archaeologyuk.org/best-practice; http://www.ceab.es/divulgacion/codigo-deontologico-del-profesional-de-la-arqueologia-2.html; http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/PrinciplesofArchaeologicalEthics/tabid/203/Default.aspx; all accessed august, 2014)

References

  • Almansa Sánchez, J. (Ed.). (2011). El futuro de la arqueología en España. Madrid: JAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniadou, I. (2009). Reflections on an archaeological ethnography of “looting” in Kozani, Greece. Public Archaeology, 8(2–3), 246–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A., Chadha, A., Hodder, I., Jachman, T., & Witmore, C. (2001). The globalization of archaeology and heritage. A discussion with Arjun Appadurai. Journal of Social Archaeology, 1(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology. Research with, by, and for Indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bánffy, E. (2013). The nonexistent Roma archaeology and nonexisting Roma archaeologists. In P. F. Biehl & C. Prescott (Eds.), Heritage in the context of globalization. Europe and the Americas (pp. 77–83). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2009). Archaeology and the fortress of rationality. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Cosmopolitan archaeologies (pp. 68–88). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cumberpatch, C., & Blinkhorn, P. (2001). Clients, contractors, curators and archaeology: Who owns the past? In M. Pluciennik (Ed.), The responsibilities of archaeologists. Archaeology and ethics (pp. 39–55). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delibes, M. (1983). El tesoro. Barcelona: Destino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, G. (2004). Frontier hybridisation or culture clash? Transnational migrant communities and sub-national identity politics in Andalusia, Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(6), 1087–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, G. C. (Ed.). (2006). Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, K. L. (2006). Skeptics, fence sitters, and true believers. Student acceptance of an improbable prehistory. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public (pp. 71–95). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, V. M. (2011). Los años del Nilo. Arqueología y memoria de Sudán y Etiopía. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnecco, C. (2012). Arqueología multicultural. Notas intempestivas. Complutum, 23(2), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2008). Whose heritage? Un-settling “The Heritage”, re-imagining the post-nation. In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. H. Jameson, & J. Schofield (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge (Orig. publ. in Third Text, 46, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollowell, J. (2006). Moral arguments on subsistence digging. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 69–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. (2009). A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies. World Archaeology, 41(4), 672–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynott, M. J., & Wylie, A. (Eds.). (1995a). Ethics in American archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Washington: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynott, M. J., & Wylie, A. (1995b). Stewardship: The central principle of archaeological ethics. In M. J. Lynott & A. Wylie (Eds.), Ethics in American archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s (pp. 28–32). Washington: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManamon, F. (1991). The many publics of archaeology. American Antiquity, 56(1), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1998). Oh my Goddess! Archaeology, sexuality and ecofeminism. Archaeological Dialogues, 5(2), 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (Ed.). (2009). Cosmopolitan archaeologies. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliore, S. (1991). Treasure hunting and pillaging in Sicily: Acquiring a deviant identity. Anthropologica, 33, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, L. (2010). The mezquita of Córdoba is made of more than bricks: Towards a broader definition of the “Heritage” protected at the World Heritage Sites. Archaeologies, 7(2), 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Pearson, M. (1995). Ethics and the dead in British archaeology. The Field Archaeologist, 23, 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, K. (2006). Memoirs of a true believer. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2001). Decoding ethics. Public Archaeology, 1, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2006). Archaeological ethics and the people of the past. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 199–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tijhuis, E. (2011). The trafficking problem. A criminological perspective. In S. Manacorda & D. Chappel (Eds.), Crime in the art and antiquities world. Illegal traffic in cultural property (pp. 87–97). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, R. (“Erik el belga”) (2012). Por amor al arte. Memorias del ladrón más famoso del mundo. Barcelona: Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. O. (2006). Cultures and the ownership of archaeological finds. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 15–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or, the cultural logic of multinational capitalism. New Left Review, 225, 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor M. Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fernández, V.M. (2015). Europe: Beyond the Canon. In: Gnecco, C., Lippert, D. (eds) Ethics and Archaeological Praxis. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation