Abstract
The inception of widely shared codes of practice for archaeologists throughout Europe in the last decades has undoubtedly contributed to enhance our daily practice, both scientifically and ethically. The next challenge ahead, if we are to both face the old and new multicultural circumstances and productively renovate our research goals and agendas, is to destabilize and dismantle in a deliberate way the “universal” components of our theoretical conceptions. We must approach and consent the up to now demonized “other” archaeologies in our society, represented by local people, “pseudoarchaeologists,” looters and private collectors, immigrants, and so forth. In conversing and learning from them we not only would fairly acknowledge our societal variety but also will enrich our visions of the past and eventually be better prepared for the ongoing combat with the true menace to a socially productive archaeology, which comes from a destructive, ultraliberal capitalist activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almansa Sánchez, J. (Ed.). (2011). El futuro de la arqueología en España. Madrid: JAS.
Antoniadou, I. (2009). Reflections on an archaeological ethnography of “looting” in Kozani, Greece. Public Archaeology, 8(2–3), 246–261.
Appadurai, A., Chadha, A., Hodder, I., Jachman, T., & Witmore, C. (2001). The globalization of archaeology and heritage. A discussion with Arjun Appadurai. Journal of Social Archaeology, 1(1), 35–49.
Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology. Research with, by, and for Indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bánffy, E. (2013). The nonexistent Roma archaeology and nonexisting Roma archaeologists. In P. F. Biehl & C. Prescott (Eds.), Heritage in the context of globalization. Europe and the Americas (pp. 77–83). New York: Springer.
Byrne, D. (2009). Archaeology and the fortress of rationality. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Cosmopolitan archaeologies (pp. 68–88). Durham: Duke University Press.
Cumberpatch, C., & Blinkhorn, P. (2001). Clients, contractors, curators and archaeology: Who owns the past? In M. Pluciennik (Ed.), The responsibilities of archaeologists. Archaeology and ethics (pp. 39–55). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 981.
Delibes, M. (1983). El tesoro. Barcelona: Destino.
Dietz, G. (2004). Frontier hybridisation or culture clash? Transnational migrant communities and sub-national identity politics in Andalusia, Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(6), 1087–1112.
Fagan, G. C. (Ed.). (2006). Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: Routledge.
Feder, K. L. (2006). Skeptics, fence sitters, and true believers. Student acceptance of an improbable prehistory. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public (pp. 71–95). London: Routledge.
Fernández, V. M. (2011). Los años del Nilo. Arqueología y memoria de Sudán y Etiopía. Madrid: Alianza.
Gnecco, C. (2012). Arqueología multicultural. Notas intempestivas. Complutum, 23(2), 93–102.
Hall, S. (2008). Whose heritage? Un-settling “The Heritage”, re-imagining the post-nation. In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. H. Jameson, & J. Schofield (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge (Orig. publ. in Third Text, 46, 1999).
Hollowell, J. (2006). Moral arguments on subsistence digging. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 69–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holtorf, C. (2009). A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies. World Archaeology, 41(4), 672–681.
Lynott, M. J., & Wylie, A. (Eds.). (1995a). Ethics in American archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Washington: Society for American Archaeology.
Lynott, M. J., & Wylie, A. (1995b). Stewardship: The central principle of archaeological ethics. In M. J. Lynott & A. Wylie (Eds.), Ethics in American archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s (pp. 28–32). Washington: Society for American Archaeology.
Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219.
McManamon, F. (1991). The many publics of archaeology. American Antiquity, 56(1), 121–130.
Meskell, L. (1998). Oh my Goddess! Archaeology, sexuality and ecofeminism. Archaeological Dialogues, 5(2), 126–142.
Meskell, L. (Ed.). (2009). Cosmopolitan archaeologies. Durham: Duke University Press.
Migliore, S. (1991). Treasure hunting and pillaging in Sicily: Acquiring a deviant identity. Anthropologica, 33, 161–175.
Monteiro, L. (2010). The mezquita of Córdoba is made of more than bricks: Towards a broader definition of the “Heritage” protected at the World Heritage Sites. Archaeologies, 7(2), 312–328.
Parker-Pearson, M. (1995). Ethics and the dead in British archaeology. The Field Archaeologist, 23, 17–18.
Reece, K. (2006). Memoirs of a true believer. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies. How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.
Tarlow, S. (2001). Decoding ethics. Public Archaeology, 1, 245–259.
Tarlow, S. (2006). Archaeological ethics and the people of the past. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 199–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tijhuis, E. (2011). The trafficking problem. A criminological perspective. In S. Manacorda & D. Chappel (Eds.), Crime in the art and antiquities world. Illegal traffic in cultural property (pp. 87–97). New York: Springer.
van den Berghe, R. (“Erik el belga”) (2012). Por amor al arte. Memorias del ladrón más famoso del mundo. Barcelona: Planeta.
Young, J. O. (2006). Cultures and the ownership of archaeological finds. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 15–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Žižek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or, the cultural logic of multinational capitalism. New Left Review, 225, 28–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernández, V.M. (2015). Europe: Beyond the Canon. In: Gnecco, C., Lippert, D. (eds) Ethics and Archaeological Praxis. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1645-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1646-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)