Abstract
Diseases of the abdomen and pelvis can have a bewildering array of clinical presentations as a result of pathological conditions involving either the gastrointestinal (GI) or the genitourinary (GU) system. The diagnosis and management of these patients therefore is often clinically challenging and can represent an enigma despite or perhaps because of the availability of numerous laboratory investigations. The introduction of imaging has opened new methods to evaluate patients presenting with diseases of the abdomen and pelvis. Imaging provides a unique inside view of the abdomen, and it frequently aids a treating physician in unraveling its complex mysteries. The explosion of various imaging modalities over the past century, ranging from plain radiography to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has revolutionized diagnosis and follow-up of patients with various types of pathology in the abdomen and pelvis. Continued advancements in the past few decades, particularly in cross-sectional imaging modalities such as multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and MRI, have made imaging an integral tool in patient diagnosis and management. Indeed, an ultrasound (US) or CT scan is often among the initial investigations performed in a patient presenting to the emergency room with abdominal complaints. Despite their immense benefits, judicious use of imaging techniques is imperative, not only to avoid excessive economic burden on our healthcare system, but also to prevent unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation with techniques such as fluoroscopy or CT scans (Table 5.1). In this chapter, our aim is to provide an overview of the various imaging techniques available in the interrogation of patients with signs and symptoms related to the abdomen and pelvis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campani R, Bottinelli O, Calliada F, Coscia D. The latest in ultrasound: three-dimensional imaging. Part II. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27 Suppl 2:S183–7.
Harvey CJ, Pilcher JM, Eckersley RJ, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO. Advances in ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:157–77.
Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B. Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2435–47.
Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R, Scott PA, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:452–62.
Cartwright SL, Knudson MP. Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:971–8.
Shuman WP, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Imaging evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and fever. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):209–12.
Bree RL, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Evaluation of patients with acute right upper quadrant pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):153–7.
Hanbidge AE, Buckler PM, O’Malley ME, Wilson SR. From the RSNA refresher courses: imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics. 2004;24:1117–35.
Spence SC, Teichgraeber D, Chandrasekhar C. Emergent right upper quadrant sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:479–96.
Ralls PW, Balfe DM, Bree RL, et al. Evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):159–66.
Hammond NA, Nikolaidis P, Miller FH. Left lower-quadrant pain: guidelines from the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:766–70.
van der Molen AJ, Hovius M. Hematuria: a problem-based imaging algorithm illustrating the recent Dutch guidelines on hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1256–65.
Newhouse JH, Amis Jr ES, Bigongiari LR, et al. Radiologic investigation of patients with hematuria. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):687–91.
Royal SA, Slovis TL, Kushner DC, et al. Hematuria. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):841–6.
Lang EK, Thomas R, Davis R, et al. Multiphasic helical computerized tomography for the assessment of microscopic hematuria: a prospective study. J Urol. 2004;171:237–43.
Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson E, Bree R, et al. Suspected adnexal masses. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):931–8.
Asrani A, Morani AK, Colen RR. Imaging of scrotum. In: Sahani D, Samir A, editors. Abdominal imaging. 1st ed. Maryland, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.
de Bombal F. Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1991.
Gore RM, Miller FH, Pereles FS, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW. Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:901–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bajpai, S., Sahani, D. (2014). Abdominal Imaging. In: Reinus, W. (eds) Clinician's Guide to Diagnostic Imaging. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8769-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8769-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8768-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8769-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)