Towards Automatic Computer-Aided Planning in Arthroplasty Surgery by Innovative Methods for Processing the Bone Surface Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Surgery and Dual Training

Abstract

2D and 3D-based innovative methods for surgical planning and simulation systems in orthopedic surgery have emerged enabling the interactive or semiautomatic identification of the clinical landmarks (CL) on the patient individual virtual bone anatomy. They allow the determination of the optimal implant sizes and positioning according to the computed CL, the visualization of the virtual bone resections, and the simulation of the overall intervention prior to surgery. Such innovative methods allow designing personalized resection guides, which substitute the traditional jigs and avoid any other alignment instrument and even navigation support. The virtual palpation of CL, highly dependent upon examiner’s expertise, was proved to be time consuming and suffered from considerable inter-observer variability. In this contribute, we disclose a fully automatic algorithmic framework that processes the femur surface, integrating surface curvature analysis, quadric fitting, recursive clustering, and clinical knowledge, aiming at computing the main parameters femur CL, namely the femoral shaft (FDA), transepicondylar (TEA), anterior–posterior (WL), posterior condylar (PCL) axes. At highest surface resolutions, the relative median error in the direction of the FDA, AFA, PCL, WL, and TEA was less than 0.50°, 1.20°, 1.0°, 1.30°, 1.50°, respectively. As expected, at the lowest surface resolution, the repeatability decreased to 1.20°, 2.70°, 3.30°, 3.0°, 4.70°, respectively. The computed directions of the FDA, PCL, WL, and TA were in agreement (0.60°, 1.55°, 1.90°, 2.40°) with the corresponding reference parameters manually identified in the original CT images by medical experts and with literature. We summarize that: (a) the AFA can be robustly computed by a geometrical analysis of the posterior profiles of the two condyles, and it can be considered a useful alternative to the TEA; (b) higher surface resolutions lead to higher repeatability of all computed quantities; (c) the TEA is less repeatable of the other axes. In conclusion, the method does not require any manual initialization, it can be automatically applied to the left and right surfaces, it is independent of the coordinate system of the original CT datasets, it is independent of the scale of the surface, and the algorithms show high stability and reduced computational load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitton D, Landry C, Vuron S, Skalli W, Lavaste F, De Guise JA (2000) 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereo corresponding points and elastic deformable meshes. Med Biol Eng Comput 38(2):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benameur S, Mignotte M, Labelle H, De Guise JA (2005) A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(12):2041–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmutz B, Reynolds KJ, Slavotinek JP (2006) Development and validation of a generic 3D model of the distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 9:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelaude F, Vander Sloten J, Lauwers B (2008) Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes. Comput Aided Surg 13(4):188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R (2007) Influence of femoral head size on im**ement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 29:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabech CH (2004) Soft tissue balancing of the hip. The role of femoral offset restoration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1078–1088

    Google Scholar 

  7. Middleton FR, Simon H, Palmer SH (2007) How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 14(3):204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (321):168–172

    Google Scholar 

  9. Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis. J Arthroplasty 20(8):1060–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D (2005) Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 12(4):293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siston RA, Cromie MJ, Gold GE, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Maloney WJ, Giori NJ (2008) Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2098–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerveri P, Pedotti A, Borghese NA (2001) Combined evolution strategies for dynamic calibration of video-based movements measurement systems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 5:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nuno N, Ahmed AM (2001) Sagittal profile of the femoral condyles and its application to femorotibial contact analysis. J Biomech Eng 123:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martelli S, Pinskerova V, Visani A (2006) Anatomical investigations on the knee by means of computer-dissection. J Mech Med Biol 6:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM et al (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87A:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi TA, Servien E, Neyret P (2008) Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(7):674–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Cerveri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cerveri, P., Marchente, M., Confalonieri, N., Manzotti, A., Baroni, G. (2014). Towards Automatic Computer-Aided Planning in Arthroplasty Surgery by Innovative Methods for Processing the Bone Surface Models. In: Garbey, M., Bass, B., Berceli, S., Collet, C., Cerveri, P. (eds) Computational Surgery and Dual Training. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8647-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8648-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation