SpringerLink
Log in

Product Architecture Decision Under Lifecycle Uncertainty Consideration: A Case Study in Providing Real-time Support to Automotive Battery System Architecture Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

Abstract

Flexibility is valuable when the future market and customer needs are uncertain, especially if the product development process is long. This chapter focuses on what the firm can do to increase their flexibility before a product is produced and sold. The flexibility is built into the product architecture, which then enables the firm to take a staged decision process. Flexibility-in-the-Project approach was developed by de Neufville and Sholtes (2011), and has been successfully applied to large infrastructure projects. Real options analysis has only been utilized in high-level product planning decisions. The case study described in this chapter is the first successful application of the Flexibility-in-the-Project framework, providing real-time engineering design decision support to Ford Motor Company engineering efforts in future vehicle electrification. In hybrid and electric vehicle applications, the high voltage battery pack hardware and control system architecture will experience multiple engineering development cycles in the next 20 years. Flexibility in design could mitigate risk due to uncertainty in both engineering and consumer preferences. Core engineering team decisions on battery pack voltage monitoring, thermal control, and support software systems will iterate as technology evolves. The research team valued key items within the technology subsystems and developed flexible strategies to allow Ford to capture upside potential while protecting against downside risk, with little-to-no extra cost at this early stage of development. The methodology used to evaluate the uncertainty, identify flexibility, and provide the real options value of flexibility is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker DA, Kumar V, Day GS, Leone RP (2010) Marketing research. 10th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernathy W (1978) Productivity dilemma: roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Allada V, Jiang L (2001) Design for robustness of modular product families for current and future markets. In: Proceedings of the DETC01, ASME design engineering and technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 9–12 Sept 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Allada V, Jiang L (2002) New modules launch planning for evolving modular product families. DETC2002/DFM-34190. In: Proceedings of ASME 2002 design engineering technical conferences and computer and information in engineering conference montreal, Canada, Sept 29–Oct 2, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrea D (2010) Battery management systems. Artech House, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan A, Geunes J (2003) Production planning with flexible product specifications: an application to specialty steel manufacturing. Oper Res 51(1):94–112

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace I (2004) Questionnaire design : how to plan, structure, and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Yuan C (1999) A probabilistic design model for achieving flexibility in design. ASME J Mech Des 121(1):77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Simons CS, Eckert CM (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. ASME J Mech Des 126(5):788–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copland T, Antikarov V (2003) Real options: a practitioner’s guide. Texere EIA (US Energy Information Administration) (2012). http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=gasoline_factors_affecting_prices. Accessed May 2012

  • de Weck O, de Neufville R, Chaize M (2004) Staged deployment of communications satellite constellations in low Earth orbit. J Aerosp Comput Inf Commun 1:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Neufville R, Scholtes S, Wang T (2006) Real options by spreadsheet: parking garage case example. J Infrastruct Syst 12(3):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Neufville R, Scholtes S (2011) Flexibility in engineering design. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Donndelinger J, Ferguson S, Lewis K (2003) Exploring mass trade-offs in preliminary vehicle design using pareto sets. AIAA conference 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CP, Clarkson J, Zanker W (2004) Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Res Eng Des 15:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel A, Browning TR (2008) Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options. Syst Eng 11(2):125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S, Lewis K (2004) Effective development of flexible systems in multidisciplinary optimization, AIAA 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S, Siddiqi A (2007) Flexible and reconfigurable systems: nomenclature and review. DETC 2007-35745. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, Las Vegas, NV, 4–7 September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S, Kasprzak E, Lewis K (2007) Designing a family of reconfigurable vehicles using multilevel mutidiscilinary design optimization. AIAA-2007-1880, the 48th AIAA/ASMR/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford DN, Durward KS (2005) Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the second Toyota Paradox. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 52(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford (2011) New Ford focus electric keeps its cool when the temperature heats up. http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=34774. Accessed 28 May 2012

  • Ford Battery Research Team (2011) Personal conversations

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke E, Schulz AP (1999) Incorporating flexibility, agility, robustness, and adaptability within the design of integrated systems—Key to success. In: Proceedings of 18th digital avionics systems conference, 1999. IEEE. St. Louis, MO, vol. 1, pp 1.A.2-1–1.A.2-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke E, Schulz AP (2005) Design for changeability (DfC): principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle. Syst Eng 8(4):342–358

    Google Scholar 

  • General Motors (2011) Cooling fins help keep chevrolet volt battery at ideal temperature. http://media.gm.com/product/public/us/en/volt/home.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2011/Feb/0214_battery.html

  • Gerwin D (1982) Do’s and Don’ts of computerized manufacturing. Harv Bus Rev 60:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M (2005) Blink, the power of thinking without thinking. Little Brown and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson SO (1984) Flexibility and productivity in complex production processes. Int J Prod Res 22(5):801–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness JA, Van de Vijver FJR, Mohler P (2003) Cross-cultural survey methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haubelt C, Telch J, Richter K (2002) System design for flexibility. Design, automation and test in europe conference and exhibition, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1990):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hybrid Market Forecasts (2006) Hybridcars.com: http://www.hybridcars.com/hybrid-drivers/hybrid-market-forecasts.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2012

  • Hybridcars.com (2009) Hybrid Cars: http://www.hybridcars.com/hybrid-sales-dashboard/December-2008-dashboard-focus-production-numbers-25416.html Accessed 20 Mar 2012

  • Hybridcars.com (2012) Dashboard: Sales Still Climbing. http://www.hybridcars.com/news/December-2011-dashboard-sales-still-climbing-35093.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2012, from Dec 2011

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory, an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J Polit Econ 98:1325–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmer DO, Roser C (1999) Evaluation of product and process design robustness. Res Eng Des 11(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor D, Kazmer D (1997) The definition and use of the process flexibility index. 1997 ASME Design engineering technical conference, DFM-97-110 Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Keese DA, Takawale NP, Seepersad C, Wood K (2006) An enhanced change modes and effects analysis (CMEA) tool for measuring product flexibility with applications to consumer products. ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conferences, DETC2006-99478, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keese DA, Tilstra C, Seepersad C, Wood KL (2007) Empirically-derived principles for designing products with flexibility for future evolution, 2007 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Sept 2007. DETC2007-35695

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieke A, Chmarra MK, Tomiyama T (2008) Modularization method for adaptable products. In: Proceedings of the 2008 design engineering technical conferences, New York, NY, 3–6 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier MW, Rechtin E (2002) The Art of Systems Architecting. CRC Press, Boca Renton

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin MV, Ishii K (2002) Design for variety: develo** standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Res Eng Des 13:213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews SH, Datar VT, Johnson B (2007) A practical method for valuing real options. J Appl Corp Finan 9(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP (1997) The power of product platforms. Free Press, New York 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissan (2012) Why did Nissan develop and EV battery? Nissan technology magazine. http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/TECHNOLOGY/MAGAZINE/ev_battery.html. Accessed May 2012

  • Olewnik A, Brauen T, Ferguson S, Lewis K (2004) A framework for flexible systems and its implementation in multiattribute decision making. ASME J Mech Des 126(3):412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olewinik A, Lewis K (2006) A decision support framework for flexible system design. J Eng Des 17(1):75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Omotoso M (2008) Alternative powertrain sales forecast. University of Michigan: http://umtri.umich.edu/content/Mike.Omotoso.Forecast.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2012

  • Pandey V, Thurston D (2008) Copulas for demand estimation for portfolio reuse design decisions. In: Proceedings of the 2008 design engineering technical conferences, DETC2008-49406, New York, NY, Aug 3–6 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalambros P, Wilde D (2000) Principles of optimal design. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson AR, Chase KW (2000) An introduction to adaptive robust design for mechanical assemblies. ASME design engineering technical conferences DETC2000/DAC-14241, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Phadke MS (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi A, Murphy JT, Kuchinsky B, Seepersad C, Wood K, Jensen D (2006) Principles of product flexibility. ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, DETC2006-99583, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechtin E (1991) Systems architecting, creating and building complex systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzi M (2012) System architecture decisions under uncertainty: a case study on automotive battery system design, MS Thesis. MIT Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross AM, Donna RH, Hastings DE (2008) Design for changeability (DfC): principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle. Syst Eng 11(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage AP, Rouse WB (1999) Handbook of systems engineering and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh JH, Hastings DE, Newman DJ (2003) Flexibility in system design and implications for aerospace systems. Acta Astronaut 53(12):927–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage S (2009) The flaw of averages. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi AK and Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. Int J Flex Manuf Syst. 2:289–328 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Manufactured in The Netherlands)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah NBJ, Viscito WL, Ross AM, Hastings DE (2008) Quantifying flexibility for architecting changeable systems. 6th Conference on engineering research, Long Beach, CA, April 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Siddique Z, Jiao J (2006) Product platform and product family design. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Siri D (2010) In race to market, Nissan’s electric car takes shortcuts. Wired http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/01/nissan-leaf-2/. Accessed 21 Feb 2012

  • Skiles SM, Singh V, Krager J, Wood K, Jensen D, Szmerekovsky A (2006) Adapted concept generation and computation techniques for the application of a transformer design theory. ASME International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, DETC2006-99584, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenquist P (2011) New York Times. Wheels: http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/hyundai-kia-overtakes-ford-while-g-m-threatens-toyota-in-2010-global-sales/. Accessed 20 Feb 2012

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2007) Introduction to econometrics. 2nd edn. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh E, de Weck O, Zhang D (2007) Determining product platform extent. Res Eng Des 18(2):67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilstra AH, Backlund PB, Seepersad CC, Wood KL (2008) Industrial case studies in product flexibility for furture evoluation: an application and evaluation of design guidelines. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, IDETC/CIE 2008, Brooklyn: ASME, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran L (2012) NHTSA statement on conclusion of chevy volt investigation. NHTSA: http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2012/NHTSA+Statement+on+Conclusion+of+Chevy+Volt+Investigation. Accessed 15 Feb 2012

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science 211(1981):453–458

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Ep**er SD (2008) Product design and development. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback JM (1996) Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY (2011) Vehicle Battery Engineering, Summer 2011 Short Course. Dearborn, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, de Neufville R (2005) Real options “in” projects. 9th Real options annual international conference, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook M (2001) The electric and hybrid electric car. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney DE (2004) Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Qi D. Van Eikema Hommes & Matthew J. Renzi

Authors
  1. Qi D. Van Eikema Hommes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew J. Renzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi D. Van Eikema Hommes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade de Lisboa, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal

    Elsa Henriques

  2. Instituto Superior Técnico TULisbon, IDMEC, Lisbon, Portugal

    Paulo Pecas

  3. Instituto Superior Técnico, TULisbon TULisbon, IDMEC, Lisbon, Portugal

    Arlindo Silva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Eikema Hommes, Q.D., Renzi, M.J. (2014). Product Architecture Decision Under Lifecycle Uncertainty Consideration: A Case Study in Providing Real-time Support to Automotive Battery System Architecture Design. In: Henriques, E., Pecas, P., Silva, A. (eds) Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5544-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation