SpringerLink
Log in

Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Systems and Control

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of cyber-physical systems (CPS) is applicable to many different application domains, for example, the transportation systems and the energy systems. This article deals with industrial CPS, which we define as CPS concepts applied to the process and manufacturing industries. Originating from traditional control systems, the industry is already since a number of years undergoing a major shift toward more connected systems, also reflected in various national initiatives such as Industrie 4.0 in Germany, Smart Manufacturing in the USA, and Intelligent Manufacturing in China. We first give a brief historic perspective on the industrial automation systems and how that is currently evolving into more general CPS. Then some ongoing trends and future challenges are discussed. This includes the shift toward more autonomous systems and challenges such as analysis of CPS including modelling and cyber-physical security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Allgöwer F, Borges de Sousa J, Kapinski J, Mosterman P, Oehlerking J, Panciatici P, Prandini M, Rajhans A, Tabuada P, Wenzelburger P (2019) Position paper on the challenges posed by modern applications to cyber-physical systems theory. Nonlinear analysis: hybrid systems, vol 34, pp 147–165

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alur R (2015) Principles of cyber-physical systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyoa E, Hoernicke M, Rodriguez P, Fay A (2016) Automatic derivation of qualitative plant simulation models from legacy pi** and instrumentation diagrams. Comput Chem Eng 92:112–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson D, Flisberg P, Rönnqvist M (2014) Using robust optimization for distribution and inventory planning for a large pulp producer. Comput Oper Res 44:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes H (2016) ExxonMobil’s quest for the future of process automation. ARC Insights

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamer T, Hoernicke M, Kloepper B, Bauer R, Isaksson AJ (2020) The autonomous industrial plant – future of process engineering, operations and maintenance. J Process Control 88:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollender M (2010) Collaborative process automation systems. International Society of Automation, Research Triangle Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson AJ, Harjunkoski I, Sand G (2018) The impact of digitalization on the future of control and operations. Comput Chem Eng 114:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CG, Park SC (2014) Survey on the virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems. J Comput Des Eng 1(3):213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EA, Seshia SA (2011) Introduction to embedded systems – a cyber-physical systems approach, LeeSashia.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B (2017) A history of cyber security attacks – 1980 to PRESENT. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Pinto JM, Grossmann I (2014) Optimal multi-scale capacity planning for power-intensive continuous processes under time-sensitive electricity prices and demand uncertainty. Part I: modeling. Comput Chem Eng 65:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhansl T, Kondoh S, Kumara S, Reinhart G, Sauer O, Schuh G, Sihn W, Ueda K (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:621–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M (2017) A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Proc Manuf 11:939–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Group (2019) O-PAS standard, version 1.0: part 1 – technical architecture overview (informative). The Open Group, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand G, Terwiesch P (2013) Closing the loops: an industrial perspective on the present and future impact of control. Eur J Control 19:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlemann TH-J, Lehmann C, Steinhilper R (2017) The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production systems for industry 4.0. Proc CIRP 61:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacchia Lun Y, D’Innocenzo A, Smarra F, Malavolta I, Di Benedetto MD (2019) State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: an automatic control perspective. J Syst Softw 149:174–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ABB AB, Corporate Research, Västerås, Sweden

    Alf J. Isaksson

Authors
  1. Alf J. Isaksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alf J. Isaksson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    John Baillieul

  2. Automation and Control Solutions, Honeywell, Golden Valley, MN, USA

    Tariq Samad

Section Editor information

  1. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Karl H. Johansson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Isaksson, A.J. (2021). Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Baillieul, J., Samad, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_100114-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_100114-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation