Abstract
The cells of a multicellular organism are derived from a single zygote and genetically almost identical. Yet, they are phenotypically very different. This difference is the result of a process commonly called cell differentiation. How the phenotypic diversity emerges during ontogenesis or regeneration is a central and intensely studied but still unresolved issue in biology. Cell biology is facing conceptual challenges that are frequently confused with methodological difficulties. How to define a cell type? What stability or change means in the context of cell differentiation and how to deal with the ubiquitous molecular variations seen in the living cells? What are the driving forces of the change? We propose to reframe the problem of cell differentiation in a systemic way by incorporating different theoretical approaches. The new conceptual framework is able to capture the insights made at different levels of cellular organization and considered previously as contradictory. It also provides a formal strategy for further experimental studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trapnell C (2015) Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res 25(10):1491ā1498
Merrell AJ, Stanger BZ (2016) Adult cell plasticity in vivo: de-differentiation and transdifferentiation are back in style. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17(7):413ā425
Blau HM, Brazelton TR, Weimann JM (2001) The evolving concept of a stem cell: entity or function? Cell 105(7):829ā841
Wagner A, Regev A, Yosef N (2016) Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat Biotechnol 34(11):1145ā1160
Zipori D (2004) The nature of stem cells: state rather than entity. Nat Rev Genet 5(11):873ā878
Han X, Zhou Z, Fei L, Sun H, Wang R, Chen Y et al (2020) Construction of a human cell landscape at single-cell level. Nature 581(7808):303ā309
Mincarelli L, Lister A, Lipscombe J, Macaulay IC (2018) Defining cell identity with single-cell omics. Proteomics 18(18):1700312
Morris SA (2019) The evolving concept of cell identity in the single cell era. Klein A, Treutlein B, editors. Development 146(12):dev169748
Laplane L, Solary E (2019) Towards a classification of stem cells. eLife 8:e46563
Paul F, Arkin Y, Giladi A, Jaitin DA, Kenigsberg E, Keren-Shaul H et al (2015) Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163(7):1663ā1677
Blakeley P, Fogarty NME, del Valle I, Wamaitha SE, Hu TX, Elder K et al (2015) Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq. Development 142(18):3151ā3165
Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y et al (2015) Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods 12(5):453ā457
Amir ED, Davis KL, Tadmor MD, Simonds EF, Levine JH, Bendall SC et al (2013) viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat Biotechnol 31(6):545ā552
Gut G, Tadmor MD, Peāer D, Pelkmans L, Liberali P (2015) Trajectories of cell-cycle progression from fixed cell populations. Nat Methods 12(10):951ā954
Moussy A, Cosette J, Parmentier R, da Silva C, Corre G, Richard A et al (2017) Integrated time-lapse and single-cell transcription studies highlight the variable and dynamic nature of human hematopoietic cell fate commitment. Huang S, editor. PLoS Biol 15(7):e2001867
Setty M, Tadmor MD, Reich-Zeliger S, Angel O, Salame TM, Kathail P et al (2016) Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat Biotechnol 34(6):637ā645
Stockholm D, Edom-Vovard F, Coutant S, Sanatine P, Yamagata Y, Corre G et al (2010) Bistable cell fate specification as a result of stochastic fluctuations and collective spatial cell behaviour. PLoS One 5(12):e14441
Yin Z, Sadok A, Sailem H, McCarthy A, **a X, Li F et al (2013) A screen for morphological complexity identifies regulators of switch-like transitions between discrete cell shapes. Nat Cell Biol 15(7):860ā871
Ezer D, Moignard V, Gƶttgens B, Adryan B (2016) Determining physical mechanisms of gene expression regulation from single cell gene expression data. PLoS Comput Biol 12(8):e1005072
Furusawa C, Kaneko K (2012) A dynamical-systems view of stem cell biology. Science 338(6104):215ā217
Huang S (2012) The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddingtonās epigenetic landscape: a framework for post-Darwinian biology? BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 34(2):149ā157
Huang S (2009) Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise. Development 136(23):3853ā3862
Waddington CH (2014) The strategy of the genes. Routledge, London, 274 p
Hume DA (2000) Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. Blood 96(7):2323ā2328
Ko MS (1991) A stochastic model for gene induction. J Theor Biol 153(2):181ā194
Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584):1183ā1186
BalĆ”zsi G, van Oudenaarden A, Collins JJ (2011) Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell 144(6):910ā925
Chen H, Larson DR (2016) What have single-molecule studies taught us about gene expression? Genes Dev 30(16):1796ā1810
Larson DR, Singer RH, Zenklusen D (2009) A single molecule view of gene expression. Trends Cell Biol 19(11):630ā637
Corre G, Stockholm D, Arnaud O, Kaneko G, ViƱuelas J, Yamagata Y et al (2014) Stochastic fluctuations and distributed control of gene expression impact cellular memory. PLoS One 9(12):e115574
Lestas I, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J (2010) Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467(7312):174ā178
SchwanhƤusser B, Wolf J, Selbach M, Busse D (2013) Synthesis and degradation jointly determine the responsiveness of the cellular proteome. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 35(7):597ā601
Dodd IB, Micheelsen MA, Sneppen K, Thon G (2007) Theoretical analysis of epigenetic cell memory by nucleosome modification. Cell 129(4):813ā822
Misteli T (2001) Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science 291(5505):843ā847
Phair RD, Scaffidi P, Elbi C, VecerovĆ” J, Dey A, Ozato K et al (2004) Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. Mol Cell Biol 24(14):6393ā6402
Turner BM (2012) The adjustable nucleosome: an epigenetic signaling module. Trends Genet 28(9):436ā444
Reid MA, Dai Z, Locasale JW (2017) The impact of cellular metabolism on chromatin dynamics and epigenetics. Nat Cell Biol 19(11):1298ā1306
Sivanand S, Viney I, Wellen KE (2018) Spatiotemporal control of acetyl-CoA metabolism in chromatin regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 43(1):61ā74
Cyr AR, Domann FE (2011) The redox basis of epigenetic modifications: from mechanisms to functional consequences. Antioxid Redox Signal 15(2):551ā589
Kupiec JJ (1997) A Darwinian theory for the origin of cellular differentiation. Mol Gen Genet MGG 255(2):201ā208
Kupiec JJ (1996) A chance-selection model for cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ 3(4):385ā390
Lane N, Martin W (2010) The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467(7318):929ā934
Paldi A (2012) What makes the cell differentiate? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 110(1):41ā43
Paldi A (2003) Stochastic gene expression during cell differentiation: order from disorder? Cell Mol Life Sci 60(9):1775ā1778
Paldi A (2020) Stochastic or deterministic? That is the question. Org J Biol Sci 4(1):77ā79
Gao NP, Gandrillon O, PƔldi A, Herbach U, Gunawan R (2023) Single-cell transcriptional uncertainty landscape of cell differentiation. F1000Res 12:426. Available from https://f1000research.com/articles/12-426
Mojtahedi M, Skupin A, Zhou J, CastaƱo IG, Leong-Quong RYY, Chang H et al (2016) Cell fate decision as high-dimensional critical state transition. PLoS Biol 14(12):e2000640
Richard A, Boullu L, Herbach U, Bonnafoux A, Morin V, Vallin E et al (2016) Single-cell-based analysis highlights a surge in cell-to-cell molecular variability preceding irreversible commitment in a differentiation process. PLoS Biol 14(12):e1002585
Velten L, Haas SF, Raffel S, Blaszkiewicz S, Islam S, Hennig BP et al (2017) Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat Cell Biol 19(4):271ā281
Kupiec JJ (2023) Kupiec the origin of individuals [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 10]. Available from https://www.academia.edu/62688694/Kupiec_The_origin_of_individuals
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues for the helpful discussions and the useful comments on the manuscript.
Financial support: EPHE, Stochagene ANR grant nĀ° BSV6 014 02.
This is an updated version of our previous article (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7456-6_3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Racine, L., Paldi, A. (2024). Understanding Cell Differentiation Through Single-Cell Approaches: Conceptual Challenges of the Systemic Approach. In: Bizzarri, M. (eds) Systems Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2745. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3577-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3577-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3576-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3577-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols