PPP Without Troposphere Estimation: Impact Assessment of Regional Versus Global Numerical Weather Models and Delay Parametrization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 149))

Abstract

Map** functions based on global Numerical Weather Models (NWM) have been developed in recent years to model the tropospheric delay in space geodetic techniques such as the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). However, the estimation of residual tropospheric delay is still a necessity when high accuracy is required. Additionally, correlation between the estimated tropospheric delay, the receiver clock offset and the station height component, prolongs the time required for the solution to converge and impacts directly the accuracy of the results. In this study, we applied tropospheric corrections from high resolution NWM in GPS processing, in an attempt to acquire rapid and accurate positioning results, waiving the need to estimate residual tropospheric delay. Although high resolution NWM have outperformed standard atmosphere parameters and global models, it is the first time they have been compared against NWM-derived corrections, such as the operational Vienna Map** Function 1 (VMF1) parameters. The processing strategy employed utilizes different scenarios characterized by their (a) NWM temporal and spatial resolution (b) grid or site-specific domain and (c) delay parametrization. The results were assessed in terms of height components bias, convergence frequency and time as well as residuals of the GPS analysis. Results showed an overall scenarios agreement of about 20 cm for the height component. However, the site-specific domain and high resolution NWM scenarios outperformed the grid-based ones in most of the cases; centimeter compared to decimeter daily height time series bias along faster convergence time constituted their performance. The final height offset with respect to their ITRF14 values was almost three times larger for the grid-based scenarios compared to the site-specific ones. The iono-free least squares adjustment residuals analysis revealed similar patterns for all the scenarios while the estimated heights experienced a reduction on the days of heavy precipitation under most of the scenarios; for some of the stations the advantage of using direct ray-tracing became obvious during those days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ggosatm.hg.tuwien.ac.at/delay.html.

  2. 2.

    http://gaps.gge.unb.ca.

  3. 3.

    http://gaps.gge.unb.ca/strategy.html.

  4. 4.

    An initial window of 2 h, allowed for convergence, has been excluded from the plot.

Abbreviations

CMC:

Canadian Meteorological Centre

ECMWF:

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

GAPS:

Global Navigation Satellite System Analysis and Positioning Software

GNSS:

Global Navigation Satellite Systems

GPS:

Global Positioning System

HRDPS:

High Resolution Deterministic Prediction System

IERS:

International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service

IGS:

International GNSS Service

MF:

Map** function

NWM:

Numerical Weather Model

PP:

Point Positioning

PPP:

Precise Point Positioning

SD:

Slant delay

TUW:

Technische Universität Wien

UNB:

University of New Brunswick

VMF1:

Vienna Map** Functions 1

ZD:

Zenith delay

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: the Natural Resources Canada for the GPS data used in this study, belonging to the Canadian Active Control System; the Canadian Meteorological Centre, Environment and Climate Change Canada for providing the data necessary for the creation of the tropospheric parameters and specifically Dr. Edouard Sandrine for her valuable assistance retrieving the data; the Technische Universität Wien (TUW) for providing the VMF1 tropospheric parameters; last but not least, the editor and the two unknown reviewers for their constructive comments and hel** to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thalia Nikolaidou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nikolaidou, T., Nievinski, F., Balidakis, K., Schuh, H., Santos, M. (2018). PPP Without Troposphere Estimation: Impact Assessment of Regional Versus Global Numerical Weather Models and Delay Parametrization. In: Freymueller, J., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation