Skip to main content

and
  1. No Access

    Chapter

    Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods — major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS

    The STAR project’s extensive replicated sampling programmes have provided the first ever quantitative comparative studies of the susceptibility of a wide range of national macroinvertebrate sampling methods an...

    Ralph T. Clarke, Daniel Hering in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  2. No Access

    Chapter

    Comparison of macroinvertebrate sampling methods in Europe

    The aim of this study was to describe in detail the national macroinvertebrate sampling methods used and to compare them with a common standard, the STAR-AQEM sampling method. Information on national methods a...

    Nikolai Friberg, Leonard Sandin in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  3. No Access

    Chapter

    Sample coherence — a field study approach to assess similarity of macroinvertebrate samples

    The EU-funded STAR-project provided an opportunity to analyse 1418 macroinvertebrate samples from 310 sampling sites throughout Europe. At most of the sites, samples were taken in two seasons using both nation...

    Armin Lorenz, Ralph T. Clarke in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  4. No Access

    Chapter

    Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics

    As part of the extensive field sampling programme within the European Union STAR project, replicate macroinvertebrate samples were taken using the STAR-AQEM sampling method at each of 2–13 sites of varying eco...

    Ralph T. Clarke, Armin Lorenz in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  5. No Access

    Chapter

    A comparison of the European Water Framework Directive physical typology and RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions for benthic macroinvertebrates

    The EU Water Framework Directive requires European Union Member States to establish ‘type-specific biological reference conditions’ for streams and rivers. Types can be defined by using either a fixed typology...

    John Davy-Bowker, Ralph T. Clarke in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  6. No Access

    Chapter

    Estimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using ‘national’ macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status

    The Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union requires all member countries to provide information on the level of confidence and precision of results in their river monitoring programmes to assess...

    Ralph T. Clarke, John Davy-Bowker in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  7. No Access

    Chapter

    Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty

    A number of biological approaches are commonly used to assess the ecological integrity of stream ecosystems. Recently, it is becoming increasingly common to use multiple organism groups in bioassessment. Advoc...

    Richard K. Johnson, Daniel Hering in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)

  8. No Access

    Chapter

    Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification

    The application of macrophytes in freshwater monitoring is still relatively limited and studies on their intercalibration and sources of variation are required. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare s...

    Ryszard Staniszewski, Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz in The Ecological Status of European Rivers: … (2006)