Studying Disasters Through Complexity Theory

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Disaster Research

Abstract

Interest in disaster management is arising as damage caused by disasters increases worldwide. Many countries are severely affected by emerging risks such as COVID-19 and the enlargement of complex disasters. Complexity theory has been applied to explain how events occur through numerous interactions among elements that often occur in a straightforward but complex manner. The power law distribution is considered one of the significant components of the complexity theory. In this study, the power law distribution has been applied to identify the relationship between the frequency and magnitude of disasters using the official government data between 1957 and 2020 in Korea. Through the estimation of power law coefficients, the level of disaster preparedness of Korea was judged by comparing them with other continents. Moreover, we provide a detailed explanation of the algorithm used for deriving the coefficients of power law distribution. Since extreme catastrophic events are in the long tail of the power law distribution, efforts should be made to have a response system for an event with a very low probability of occurrence but a huge impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton, C. C., Nishenko, S. P., Tebbens, S. F., & Loeb, W. A. (1994). Fractal scaling and forecasting of the size and frequency for Florida hurricanes 1886-1991 and of U.S. hurricane financial loss. Santa Fe institute workshop on natural hazards reduction (p. 1). Jan 5–9. Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra, O., Johnson, N., Meier, P., Restrepo, J., & Spagat, M. (2006). Natural disasters, casualties and power laws: A comparative analysis with armed conflict. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2004). A critical introduction to the risk society. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fs3c4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, A., & Solomon, S. (2000). Power laws in cities population, financial markets and internet sites (scaling in systems with a variable number of components). Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 287(1–2), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 51(4), 661–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E., & McEntire, D. A. (2003). Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends, and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(2), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, D. (2015). Disaster theory: An interdisciplinary approach to concepts and causes. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication (pp. 251–262).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A. (2003). Probabilities behaving badly: Complexity theory and environmental uncertainty. UC Davis Law Review, 37. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/614

  • Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., & Stanley, H. E. (2003). A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations. Nature, 423, 267–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janczura, J., & Weron, R. (2012). Black swans or dragon-kings? A simple test for deviations from the power law. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 205, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H. H., & Ko, Y. L. (2014). Large variance and fat tail of damage by natural disaster. Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, 2744–2753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, B. D., & Pakkot, M. R. (2011). Monetary policy and natural disasters in a DSGE model. Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 973–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., & Sohn, H. G. (2018). Disaster risk management in the Republic of Korea. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469. ISSN 1520-0469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature (Vol. 51, p. 286). Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Interior and Safety (MOIS). (2021). Yearbook of social disaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. (2003). Natural disaster and development in a globalizing world. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (2000). Normal accidents. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828494

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2009). An unnatural disaster. Administration & Society, 41(6), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399709345628

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Gyoo Sohn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sohn, HG., Kim, Yk., Kwon, Y. (2023). Studying Disasters Through Complexity Theory. In: Singh, A. (eds) International Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8388-7_150

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation