Abstract
Today, almost two centuries after his death, Sade still stands for absolute evil. He cannot, however, be reduced to this role. In various ways, he makes his presence felt in literature and philosophy. He is at once a man, a body of work and a symbol. Critics have remarked that he often resurfaces during great, nihilistic crises, or at times when civilization seems to lose its bearings. Michel Delon writes that Sade is ‘une des figures centrales de notre modernité et même de notre postmodernité’ (one of the central figures of our modernity and indeed of our postmodernity’).1 He acts as a historical reference point, while disturbing diachrony as such; he functions as a syntagm always questioning any given ideology and any definition of ‘man’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Michel Delon, Les Vies de Sade (Paris: Éditions Textuel, 2007), p. 5. All translations are my own.
See Georges Didi-Huberman, L’Image survivante. Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg (Paris: Minuit, 2002). Throughout this chapter, ‘survival’ (in French, ‘survivance’) will be used broadly in Warburg’s sense, meaning the endurance of given signifying forms through the ages.
Dominique Aury is also a pseudonym. Pauline Réage’s real name is Anne Desclos, as the author herself reveals in 1994, in an interview for the New Yorker. Incidentally, another ‘scandalous’ book that appeared in 1954 and served as something of a watershed is Françoise Sagan’s Bonjour tristesse (Paris: Julliard, 1954).
Alexandra Destais, ‘L’Émergence de la littérature érographique féminine en France: 1954–1975’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, Université de Caen, 2006).
André Breton, Georges Bataille, Jean Cocteau and Jean Paulban, L’Affaire Sade, compte rendu exact du procès intenté par le Ministère public (Paris: Pauvert, 1957), p. 55.
Régine Deforges, O m’a dit. Entretiens avec Pauline Réage (Paris: Pauvert, 1995), pp. 36–8.
See Éric Marty, Pourquoi le XX esiècle a-t-il pris Sade au sérieux? (Paris: Seuil, 2011).
See Jérôme Garcin, ‘Comment on a lancé les livres cultes: 1954, “Histoire d’O”’, Le Nouvel Observateur, issue 1970 (8 August 2002), 58–61.
See François Chalais, Lettre ouverte aux pornographes (Paris: Albin Michel, 1975).
Pierre Klossowski, ‘Sade mon prochain’ précédé de ‘Le Philosophe scélérat’ (Paris: Seuil, 1947).
Jean-Jacques Pauvert, La Traversée du livre, mémoires (Paris: Viviane Hamy, 2004).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Perrine Coudurier
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coudurier, P. (2013). The Survival of Sade in French Literature of the 1950s. In: Baldwin, T., Fowler, J., de Medeiros, A. (eds) Questions of Influence in Modern French Literature. Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309143_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309143_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45632-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30914-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)