Deleuze, Leibniz, Proust and Beckett: Thinking in Literature

  • Chapter
Beckett’s Proust/Deleuze’s Proust
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

The problem of the image of thought occurs at important moments within Deleuze’s works, yet it is not always at the forefront of his ideas. In Negotiations, Deleuze indicates that Difference and Repetition ‘is really about the nature of the postulates of the image of thought’, and that he ‘comes back to it in Proust and Signs, because Proust confronts the Greek image with all the power of signs’.1 The chronology is somewhat distorted in these comments: the concept, in fact, is first mentioned in Nietzsche et la Philosophie (1962), then again in the shorter first edition of Proust and Signs, Proust et les Signes (1964), before appearing in Difference et Repetition (1968). Yet the concept is more fully developed in Difference and Repetition and Proust and Signs, which both have chapters entitled ‘The Image of Thought’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gilles Deleuze, Negotiations, 1972–1990, tr. Martin Joughin (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, tr. Hugh Tomlinson (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), pp. 103–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plato, The Collected Dialogues, including the Letters, ed. Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 755.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, tr. Paul Patton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 142–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Gilles Deleuze, Proust and Signs, tr. Richard Howard (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000), pp. 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, tr. Tom Conley (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), pp. 61–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilles Deleuze, Cinema II: The Time-Image, tr. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.W. Leibniz, ‘Principles of Nature and of Grace. 1714’, tr. Mary Morris and G.H.R. Parkinson, in Philosophical Writings, ed. G.H.R. Parkinson (London: J.M. Dent, 1992), p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See G.W. Leibniz, Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God and the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, tr. E.M. Huggard, ed. Austin Farrer (Chicago: Open Court, 1990), pp. 365–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Gilles Deleuze, What is Philosophy?, tr. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 155–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samuel Beckett, Watt (London: John Calder, 1978), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilles Deleuze, ‘The Exhausted’, tr. Anthony Uhlmann, in Essays Critical and Clinical, [all other essays] tr. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), pp. 152–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Gilles Deleuze, ‘The Greatest Irish Film’, in Essays Critical and Clinical, tr. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), pp. 23–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Samuel Beckett, ‘Letter to Georges Duthuit, 9–10 March 1949’, tr. Walter Redfern, in Beckett After Beckett, ed. Anthony Uhlmann and S.E. Gontarski (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 2006), pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samuel Beckett, ‘Peintres de l’empêchement’, in Disjecta, ed. Ruby Cohn (London: John Calder, 1983), pp. 133–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Samuel Beckett, ‘Recent Irish Poetry’, in Disjecta, ed. Ruby Cohn (London: John Calder, 1983), pp. 70–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Anthony Uhlmann, Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 36–64.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Stephen Greenblatt, Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare (London: Jonathan Cape, 2004), pp. 323–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.W. Leibniz, ‘Of an Organum or Ars Magna of Thinking’, tr. Mary Morris and G.H.R. Parkinson, in Philosophical Writings, ed. G.H.R. Parkinson (London: J.M. Dent, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Anthony Uhlmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uhlmann, A. (2009). Deleuze, Leibniz, Proust and Beckett: Thinking in Literature. In: Bryden, M., Top**, M. (eds) Beckett’s Proust/Deleuze’s Proust. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239470_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation