Modular robotics design: System integration of a robot for disabled people

  • Part V Industrial Robot Analysis, Design And Control
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in system and robot analysis and control design

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 243))

Abstract

A modular and reconfigurable robot which is possible to mount on a nobile base has been designed and constructed and is now in the systems in tegration validation phase of the physical robot. During this work, simulations using IGRIP and other related analysis software tools have been important during the development work to analyze and evaluate the design including kinematics, dynamics, controller evaluation of conceptual design solutions and virtual scenarios.

The concurrent development of the mechanics and the controller is facilitated through a robotic simulator that speed up the project work and reduces the technical risk of failure. This is an important factor in complex projects with time constraints where a failure in any part of the project may affect the whole project. In this case, testing and validation can be done on almost every detail in the project. Furthermore, even if a failure occur in the controller which can not be resolved during the lifetime of the project the robot arm can be driven using the simulator with some degradation in real time performance only. Furthermore, virtual scenarios are modeled and simulated that will provide the project team and intended users with a realistic tool to discuss user requirements and user interfaces with the intended users before the robot exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Hegarty. Rehabilitation robotics: The users perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Rehabilitation Robotics, Cambridge, UK, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. van der Loos, J. Hammel, and L. Leifer. DeVar transfer from R&D to vocational and educational settings. In Proceedings of the Fourth Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, pages 151–155, Wilmington, Delaware, June 14–16, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.J Top**, H. Heck, and G. Bolmsjö. An overview of the BIOMED 2 RAIL (Robotics Aid to Independent Living) Project. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'97, Bath University, UK, 14–15 April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Øderud, J.E. Bastiansen, and S. Tyvand. Experiences with the MANUS wheelchair mounted manipulator. In Proceedings of ECART 2, page 29.1, Stockholm, May 26–28 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Casals, R. Villà, and D. Casals. A soft assistant arm for tetraplegics. In Proceedings of the 1st TIDE Congress, pages 103–107, Brussels, 6–7 April 1993. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 9, IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.D. Jackson. Robotics and its role in hel** disabled people. Engineering Science and Educational Journal, pages 267–272, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hennequin and Y. Hennequin. Inventaid, wheelchair mounted manipulator. In Proceedings of the 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Rehabilitation Robotics, Cambridge, UK, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sam Greenhill. The digit muscle. Industrial Robot, 20(5):29–30, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Levine, D. Bell, and Y. Koren. An example of a shared-control system for assistive technologies. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Computers for Handicapped Persons, Vienna, Austria, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paolo Dario et al. Movaid: a new European joint project in the field of rehabilitation robotics. http: //www.alfea.it/movaid/Public_Domain_Area/Papers/paper1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krister Brink. Event Based Control of Industrial Robot Systems. Dept. of Production and Materials Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1996. Lic. Thesis, CODEN:LUTMDN/(TMMV-1026)/1–139/(1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Ameduri J-Y Jo, Y. Kim and A. Podgurski. A new role of graphical simulation: Software testing. Technical Report Technical Report TR-96-115, Center for Automation and Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

S. G. Tzafestas PhD G. Schmidt PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bolmsjo, G., Olsson, M., Hedenborn, P., Lorentzon, U., Charrier, F., Nasri, H. (1999). Modular robotics design: System integration of a robot for disabled people. In: Tzafestas, S.G., Schmidt, G. (eds) Progress in system and robot analysis and control design. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 243. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0110561

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0110561

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-123-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-535-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation