SpringerLink
Log in

Leveraging a School–University Partnership Model Through the Process of Co-design: A Case Study of One Australian School–University Partnership and Its Developmental Stages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships

  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

Collaborative school–university partnerships provide opportunities for education researchers to come together with classroom teachers to translate research into practice. They also provide a vehicle in which to enhance the pre-service teacher (PST) experience. The case study presented in this chapter explicitly reflects on a co-designed partnership model from the perspectives of three university-based teacher educators and one school-based educator. The driving purpose of this co-design process was the enrichment of the pre-service teachers’ professional experience (PX) placement in schools and supporting the professional learning of classroom teachers regarding mentoring practices. The context was a PX unit in the second year of a Bachelor of Primary Education initial teacher education (ITE) program. Findings from this case study demonstrate that a key motivation for involvement in this collaborative partnership was the co-construction of knowledge to authentically inform the practice of academic researchers and classroom practitioners. There are three considerations that emerge from this study around the application of this model in other settings: the co-design model, the relational agency of pre-service teachers, and the coaching approach adopted by school-based educators. This study provides a point of reference from which to begin collaborative discourse to shape new partnerships and generate meaningful learning opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 187.19
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2015). Supervising pre-service teacher teacher program review. AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2016). Initial teacher education: Data report 2016. AITSL. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/initial-teacher-data-report-2016

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2019). AITSL strategic plan 2019–2022. Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. AITSL. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/aitsl-strategic-plan.pdf?sfvrsn=4e30e93c_42

  • Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school–university research partnerships: An analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Peretz, M., Gottlieb, E., & Gideon, I. (2018). Coaching between experts—Opportunities for teachers’ professional development. Teacher Development, 22(3), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. W., & Baker, W. (2016). The boundary spanner in professional development schools: In search of common nomenclature. School-University Partnerships, 9(2), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Caine, V. (2013). Narrative inquiry. In A. A. Trainor & E. Graue (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences (pp. 166–179). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J., & Jordan, K. (2019). Who is the hybrid teacher educator? Understanding professional identity in school–university partnership. In Professionalism and teacher education: Voices from policy and practice (pp. 71–90).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J., & Jordan, K. (2022). Beyond cream, off-white, and beige: Finding slippages in accreditation for innovation in professional experience. In Reconstructing the work of teacher educators: Finding spaces in policy through agentic approaches—Insights from a research collective (pp. 71–87). Springer Nature Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? Educational Researcher, 34(7), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034007003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009). National partnership agreement on improving teacher quality. AITSL. https://www.acara.edu.au/reporting/national-report-on-schooling-in-australia/nrosia2009/national-initiatives-and-achievements/teaching-and-leadership

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, N., & Roberts, P. (2018). Revisiting the schoolhouse: A literature review on staffing rural, remote and isolated schools in Australia 2004–2016. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 28(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A., & Kinti, I. (2013). Working relationally at organisational boundaries: Negotiating expertise and identity. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 142–155). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsden-Clifton, J., & Jordan, K. (2015, July 8–10). What’s up DOCC? Creating third space courses in teacher education [Refereed paper]. Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA) conference, Darwin, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsden-Clifton, J., & Jordan, K. (2016). Reframing professional experience: Adopting a distributed open collaborative course framework to facilitate third spaces. In T. Barkatsas & A. Bertram (Eds.), Global learning in the 21st century (pp. 57–70). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Kervin, L., Glass, C., Gobby, B., Le Cornu, R., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2020). Teaching: Dilemmas, challenges and opportunities (6th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, H., Forgasz, R., Williams, J., & White, S. (2018). Reimagining the role of mentor teachers in professional experience: Moving to I as fellow teacher educator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1437391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Mackisack, V. (2017). Re-envisaging and reinvigorating school–university practicum partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1201043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsuyker, L., Sawford, R., Bartlett, K., Bird, S., Corcoran, A., Fawcett, D., Ferguson, M., Henry, S., Livermore, K., & Markus, L. (2007). Top of the class: Report on the inquiry into teacher education. House of Representatives Publishing Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriewaldt, J., Nash, M., Windsor, S., Thornton, J., & Reid, C. (2017). Fostering professional learning through evidence-informed mentoring dialogues in school settings. In J. Kriewaldt, A. Ambrosetti, D. Rorrison, & R. Capeness (Eds.), Educating future teachers: Innovative perspectives in professional experience (pp. 157–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_10

  • Loughland, T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Using teacher collective efficacy as a conceptual framework for teacher professional learning—A case study. Australian Journal of Education, 64(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, N. (1995). Coaching and mentoring. Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, M., Byth, A., Whewell, D., Kilkenny, M. L., & Hickey, R. (2022). Working relationally to bridge the divide: An exploration of an Australian school–university professional experience partnership from the perspectives of five stakeholders. In O. J. Bradbury & D. Acquaro (Eds.), School-university partnerships—Innovation in initial teacher education. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5057-5_2

  • Ng, W., Nicholas, H., & Williams, A. (2010). School experience influences on pre-service teacher teachers’ evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T. M., & Loughland, T. (2018). Pre-service teacher teachers’ construction of professional identity through peer collaboration during professional experience: A case study in Australia. Teaching Education, 29(1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1994). Develo** understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Onge, H., & Wallace, D. (2003). Leveraging communities of practice for strategic advantage. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, E. S., Lakind, D., Frazier, S. L., & Jakobsons, L. (2015). Coaching early career teachers in urban elementary schools: A mixed-method study. School Mental Health, 7, 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, V. (2019). The well-being of the early career teacher: A review of the literature on the pivotal role of mentoring. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 8(4), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victoria State Government Education and Training. (2020). Teaching academies of professional practice. Victoria State Government. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/educationstate/Pages/tapp.aspx

  • Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2018). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). A guide to managing knowledge: Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslade, M., Loughland, T., & Eady, M. (2022). Reimagining the school-university partnership and the role of the school-based professional experience coordinator: A New South Wales case study. In O. J. Bradbury & D. Acquaro (Eds.), School-university partnerships—Innovation in initial teacher education (pp. 27–41). Springer Nature Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Melanie Nash, Allison Byth, Emilio Kardaris, Angela Fitzgerald & Simone White

  2. Montmorency South Primary School, Melbourne, Australia

    Nerinda Hodgson

Authors
  1. Melanie Nash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allison Byth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emilio Kardaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nerinda Hodgson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Angela Fitzgerald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simone White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Nash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Corinne A. Green

  2. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Michelle J. Eady

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nash, M., Byth, A., Kardaris, E., Hodgson, N., Fitzgerald, A., White, S. (2024). Leveraging a School–University Partnership Model Through the Process of Co-design: A Case Study of One Australian School–University Partnership and Its Developmental Stages. In: Green, C.A., Eady, M.J. (eds) Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8837-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8838-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation