Development Strategies and Prospects of Carbon Nanotube as Heavy Metal Adsorbent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanomaterials for Environmental and Agricultural Sectors

Abstract

The carbon elements less than 100 nm are known as carbon nanoparticles. The family of carbon nanomaterials, which includes graphene (atomically flat carbon), graphene oxide, carbon nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes, is expanding quickly. Many electrical, optical, and biological applications employ carbon nanoparticles. The processes of carbonization, heating, activation, and grinding are used to produce carbon nanoparticles. Its synthesis and activation procedure for various medicinal and biological uses and basic features are explained in this chapter. Such as the manufacturing of carbon-based nanomaterials, wet and dry synthesis, covalent and noncovalent binding, and there are some naturally occurring carbon nanotubes in the environment, and their potential as heavy metal absorbents is promising. This study states that there are several techniques for creating carbon nanoparticles, which exhibit significant benefits as environmental heavy metal adsorbents.

Shivani Tyagi and Pranchal Rajput are equally contributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gupta N, Rai DB, Jangid AK, Kulhari H (2019) Use of nanotechnology in antimicrobial therapy. Methods Microbiol 46:143–172

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thangadurai D, Sangeetha J, Prasad R, Editors (2020) Nanotechnology for food, agriculture, and environment. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker K (2015) Working with carbon nanoparticles. https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4149

  4. Ray SC, Jana NR (2017) Carbon nanomaterials for biological and medical applications. Elsevier 2017:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sethy K, Pati S, Jena D, Mishra CK (2020) Heavy metal toxicity in animals: a review. Pharma Innov J 9:134–137

    Google Scholar 

  6. Izah SC, Chakrabarty N, Srivastav AL (2016) A review on heavy metal concentration in potable water sources in Nigeria: human health effects and mitigating measures. Expos Health 8(2):285–304

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mobasherpour I, Salahi E, Ebrahimi M (2012) Removal of divalent nickel cations from aqueous solution by multi-walled carbon nano tubes: equilibrium and kinetic processes. Res Chem Intermed 38(9):2205–2222

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shaniuk TJ (2005) Arsenic removal media. Google Patents

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace GT, Seibert DL, Holzknecht SM, Thomas WH (1982) The biogeochemical fate and toxicity of mercury in Controlled Experimental Ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 15 (2):151–182

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reesink BH, van Gasteren N (2003) US Patent 6,524,994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chaignon V, Sanchez-Neira I, Herrmann P, Jaillard B, Hinsinger P (2003) Copper bioavailability and extractability as related to chemical properties of contaminated soils from a vine-growing area. Environ Pollut 123(2):229–238

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barceloux DG, Barceloux D (1999) Molybdenum. J Toxicol: Clin Toxicol 37(2):231–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elinder CG, Kjellström T, Hogstedt C, Andersson K, Spång G (1985) Cancermortality of cadmium workers. Occup Environmen Med 42(10):651–655

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fang H, Wu Y, Zhao J, Zhu J (2006) Silver catalysis in the fabrication of silicon nanowire arrays. Nanotechnology 17(15):3768

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mauter MS, Elimelech M (2008) Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 42(16):5843–5859

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu Y, Pang H, Liu Y, Wang X, Yu S, Fu D, Chen J, Wang X (2019) Environmental remediation of heavy metal ions by novel-nanomaterials: a review. Environ pollut 246:608–620

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baby R, Saifullah B, Hussein MZ (2019) Carbon nanomaterials for the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated water and environmental remediation. Nanoscale res lett 14(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Han X, Li S, Peng Z, Al-Yuobi ARO, Bashammakh ASO, Leblanc RM (2016) Interactions between carbon nanomaterials and biomolecules. J oleo sci ess15248

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee K, Mazare A, Schmuki P (2014) One-dimensional titanium dioxide nanomaterials: nanotubes. Chem Rev 114(19):9385–9454

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obitayo W, Liu T (2012) A review: carbon nanotube-based piezoresistive strain sensors. J Sens

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, De Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes–the route toward applications. Sci 297(5582):787–792

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abbasi M (2017) Synthesis and characterization of magnetic nanocomposite of chitosan/SiO2/carbon nanotubes and its application for dyes removal. J Clean Prod 145:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  23. Esumi K, Ishigami M, Nakajima A, Sawada K, Honda H (1996) Chemical treatment of carbon nanotubes. Carbon (New York, NY) 34(2):279–281

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacKenzie KJ, See CH, Dunens OM, Harris AT (2008) Do single-walled carbon nanotubes occur naturally? Nat Nano technol 3(6):310–310

    Google Scholar 

  25. Velasco-Santos C, Martínez-Hernández AL, Consultchi A, Rodríguez R, Castaño VM (2003) Naturally produced carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 373(3–4):272–276

    Google Scholar 

  26. Becker L, Bada JL, Winans RE, Bunch TE (1994) Fullerenes in allende meteorite. Nature 372(6506):507

    Google Scholar 

  27. Andrade K, Guerra S, Debut A (2014) Fullerene-based symmetry in hibiscus rosa-sinensis pollen. PLoS ONE 9(7):e102123

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gore JP, Sane A (2011) Flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes. Carbon Nanotubes-Synth, Charact Appl 1:16801

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar M, Ando Y (2010) Chemical vapor deposition of carbon nanotubes: a review on growth mechanism and mass production. J Nano sci Nano technol 10(6):3739–3758

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Q, Huang JQ, Zhao MQ, Qian WZ, Wei F (2011) Carbon nanotube mass production: principles and processes. Chem Sus Chem 4(7):864–889

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuzawa Y, Takada Y, Kodaira T, Kihara H, Kataura H, Yoshida M (2014) Effective nondestructive purification of single-walled carbon nanotubes based on high-speed centrifugation with a photochemically removable dispersant. J Phys Chem C 118(9):5013–5019

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morsy M, Helal M, El-Okr M, Ibrahim M (2014) Preparation, purification and characterization of high purity multi-wall carbon nanotube. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 132:594–598

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shameli K, Bin AM, Yunus WZW, Ibrahim NA, Darroudi M (2010) Synthesis and characterization of silver/talc nanocomposites using the wet chemical reduction method. Int J Nanomed 5(1):743–751

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chae C, Kim KW, Kim SJ, Lee D, Jo Y, Yun YJ, Moon J, Choi Y, Lee SS, Choi S, Jeong S (2015) 3D intra-stacked CoO/carbon nanocomposites welded by Ag nanoparticles for high-capacity, reversible lithium storage. Nanoscale 7(23):10368–10376

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dong J, Liu W, Li H, Su X, Tang X, Uher C (2013) In situ synthesis and thermoelectric properties of PbTe–graphene nanocomposites by utilizing a facile and novel wet chemical method. J Mater Chem A 1(40):12503–12511

    Google Scholar 

  36. Du WC, Yin YX, Zeng XX, Shi JL, Zhang SF, Wan LJ, Guo YG (2016) Wet chemistry synthesis of multidimensional nanocarbon-sulfur hybrid materials with ultrahigh sulfur loading for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(6):3584–3590

    Google Scholar 

  37. Husen A, Iqbal M (2019b) Nanomaterials and plant potential: an overview. In: Husen A, Iqbal M (eds) Nanomaterials and plant potential, vol 11. Springer International Publishing AG, Gewerbestrassep, Cham, pp 3–29 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05569-1_1

  38. Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2014) Phytosynthesis of nanoparticles: concept, controversy and application. Nanoscale Res Lett 9(229):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  39. Husen A (2023) Smart nanomaterials from agricultural and horticultural products. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  40. Husen A (2023) Secondary metabolites based green synthesis of nanomaterials and their applications. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 152 Beach Road, #21–01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  41. Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2023) Advances in smart nanomaterials and their applications. Elsevier Inc., 50 Hampshire St., 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Husen, A (2022) Engineered nanomaterials for sustainable agricultural production, soil improvement and stress management. Elsevier Inc., 50 Hampshire St., 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    Google Scholar 

  43. Husen A, Iqbal M (2019a) Nanomaterials and plant potential, vol 11. Springer International Publishing AG, Gewerbestrasse. Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05569-1

  44. **-Chul K, Madhusudhan A, Husen A (2021) Smart nanomaterials in biomedical applications, vol 11. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse. Cham, Switzerland, p 6330

    Google Scholar 

  45. Taghiyari HR, Morrell JJ, Husen A (2022) Emerging nanomaterials (Opportunities and Challenges in Forestry Sectors), 11. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse, Cham, Switzerland, p 6330 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17378-3

  46. Yogeshwaran S, Natrayan L, Udhayakumar G, Godwin G, Yuvaraj L (2021) Effect of waste tyre particles reinforcement on mechanical properties of jute and abaca fiber- epoxy hybrid composites with pre-treatment. Mater Today Proc 37(Part 2):1377–80.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li S, Wang Y, Lai C, Qiu J, Ling M, Martens W et al (2014) Directional synthesis of tin oxide graphene nanocomposites via a one-step up-scalable wet-mechanochemical route for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2(26):10211–10217

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ramachandran R, Saranya M, Grace AN, Wang F (2017) MnS nanocomposites based on doped graphene: simple synthesis by a wet chemical route and improved electrochemical properties as an electrode material for supercapacitors. RSC Adv 7(4):2249–2257

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gich M, Fernández-Sánchez C, Cotet LC, Niu P, Roig A (2013) Facile synthesis of porous bismuth–carbon nanocomposites for the sensitive detection of heavy metals. J Mater Chem A 1(37):11410–11418

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mirzaee SA, Jaafarzadeh N, Gomes HT, Jorfi S, Ahmadi M (2019) Magnetic titanium/carbon nanotube nanocomposite catalyst for oxidative degradation of Bisphenol A from high saline polycarbonate plant effluent using catalytic wet peroxide oxidation. Chem Eng J 370:372–386

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ko TH, Radhakrishnan S, Seo MK, Khil MS, Kim HY, Kim BS (2017) A green and scalable dry synthesis of NiCo2O4/graphene nanohybrids for high-performance supercapacitor and enzymeless glucose biosensor applications. J Alloys Compd 696:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kalathil S, Khan MM, Banerjee AN, Lee J, Cho MH (2012) A simple biogenic route to rapid synthesis of Au@TiO2 nanocomposites by electrochemically active biofilms. J Nanopart Res 14(8):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kellici S, Acord J, Vaughn A, Power NP, Morgan DJ, Heil T et al (2016) Calixarene assisted rapid synthesis of silver-graphene nanocomposites with enhanced antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(29):19038–19046

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yogeshwaran S, Natrayan L, Rajaraman S, Parthasarathi S, Nestro S (2021) Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of Epoxy/graphene/fish scale and fermented spinach hybrid bio composite by hand lay-up technique. Mater Today Proc 37(Part 2):1578–1583.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vergaro V, Pisano I, Grisorio R, Baldassarre F, Mallamaci R, Santoro A et al (2019) CaCO3 as an environmentally friendly renewable material for drug delivery systems: uptake of HSA-CaCO3 nanocrystals conjugates in cancer cell lines. Mater 12(9):1481

    Google Scholar 

  56. da Silva LMG, Lemos HG, Santos SF, Antunes RA, Venancio EC (2018) Polyaniline/Carbon black nanocomposites: the role of synthesis conditions on the morphology and properties. Mater Today Commun. 16:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wu KH, Chang YC, Yang CC, Gung YJ, Yang FC (2009) Synthesis, infrared stealth and corrosion resistance of organically modified silicate–polyaniline/carbon black hybrid coatings. Eur Polym J 45(10):2821–2829

    Google Scholar 

  58. Esmizadeh E, Naderi G, Paran SMR (2017) Preparation and characterization of hybrid nanocomposites based on NBR/Nanoclay/Carbon black. Polym Compos 38:E181–E188

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wu KH, Ting TH, Wang GP, Ho WD, Shih CC (2008) Effect of carbon black content on electrical and microwave absorbing properties of polyaniline/carbon black nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 93(2):483–488

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mickelson ET, Chiang IW, Zimmerman JL, Boul PJ, Lozano J, Liu J, Margrave JL (1999) Solvation of fluorinated single-wall carbon nanotubes in alcohol solvents. J Phy Chem B 103(21):4318–4322

    Google Scholar 

  61. Herrero MA, Prato M (2008) Recent advances in the covalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 483(1):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  62. Holzinger M, Abraham J, Whelan P, Graupner R, Ley L, Hennrich F, Hirsch A (2003) Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with (R-)oxycarbonylnitrenes. J Am Chem Soc 125(28):8566–8580

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chen RJ, Bangsaruntip S, Drouvalakis KA, Wong Shi Kam N, Shim M, Li Y, Kim W, Utz PJ, Dai H (2003) Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(9):4984–4989

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao YL, Stoddart JF (2009) Noncovalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Acc Chem Res 42(8):1161–1171

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhao J, Lu JP, Han J, Yang CK (2003) Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes by aromatic organic molecules. Appl Phys Lett 82(21):3746

    Google Scholar 

  66. Georgakilas V, Tiwari JN, Kemp KC, Perman JA, Bourlinos AB, Kim KS et al (2016) Noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide for energy materials, biosensing, catalytic, and biomedical applications. Chem Rev 116(9):5464–5519

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nakayama-Ratchford N, Bangsaruntip S, Sun X, Welsher K, Dai H (2007) Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes by fluorescein-polyethylene glycol: supramolecular conjugates with pH-dependent absorbance and fluorescence. J Am Chem Soc 129(9):2448–2449

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chen J, Collier CP (2005) Noncovalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with water-soluble porphyrins. J Phys Chem B 109(16):7605–7609

    Google Scholar 

  69. Petrov P, Stassin F, Pagnoulle C, Jérôme R (2003) Noncovalent functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes by pyrene containing polymers. Chem Commun 3(23):2904–2905

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ghosh A, Rao KV, George SJ, Rao CNR (2010) Noncovalent functionalization, exfoliation, and solubilization of graphene in water by employing a fluorescent coronene carboxylate. Chem A Eur J 16(9):2700–2704

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tian R, Jia X, Yang J, Li Y, Song H (2020) Large-scale, green, and high-efficiency exfoliation and noncovalent functionalization of fluorinated graphene by ionic liquid crystal. Chem Eng 395:125104

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kim J, Cha J, Chung B, Ryu S, Hong SH (2020) Fabrication and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy nanocomposites containing high loadings of noncovalently functionalized graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 192:108101

    Google Scholar 

  73. Alzate-Carvajal N, Bolivar-Pineda LM, Meza-Laguna V, Basiuk VA, Basiuk EV, Baranova EA (2020) Oxygen evolution reaction on single-walled carbon nanotubes noncovalently functionalized with metal phthalocyanines. Chem Electro Chem 7(2):428–436

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ju Z, Yao X, Luo Z, Cao M, **ao W (2020) Theoretical studies on the noncovalent interaction of fructose and functionalized ionic liquids. Carbohydr Res 487:107882

    Google Scholar 

  75. Karimi M, Solati N, Amiri M, Mirshekari H, Mohamed E, Taheri M et al (2015) Carbon nanotubes part I: preparation of a novel and versatile drug-delivery vehicle. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 12(7):1071–1087

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ribeiro RS, Silva AMT, Figueiredo JL, Faria JL, Gomes HT (2016) Catalytic wet peroxide oxidation: a route towards the application of hybrid magnetic carbon nanocomposites for the degradation of organic pollutants. A review. Appl Catal B Environ 187:428–460

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zhou X, Dai Z, Bao J, Guo YG (2013) Wet milled synthesis of an Sb/MWCNT nanocomposite for improved sodium storage. J Mater Chem A 1(44):13727–13731

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zein SHS, Yeoh LC, Chai SP, Mohamed AR, Mahayuddin MEM (2007) Synthesis of manganese oxide/carbon nanotube nanocomposites using wet chemical method. J Mater Process Technol 190(1–3):402–405

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rumyantseva MN, Kovalenko VV, Gaskov AM, Pagnier T, Machon D, Arbiol J, Morante JR (2005) Nanocomposites SnO2/Fe2O3: wet chemical synthesis and nanostructure characterization. Sens Actuators B Chem 109(1):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  80. Bissen M, Frimmel FH (2003) Arsenic- a review. Part II: oxidation of arsenic and its removal in water treatment. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 31(2):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  81. Gihring TM, Druschel GK, McCleskey RB, Hamers RJ, Banfield JF (2001) Rapid arsenite oxidation by Thermus aquaticus and Thermus thermophilus: field and laboratory investigations. Environ sci technol 35(19):3857–3862

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kim J, Benjamin MM (2004) Modeling a novel ion exchange process for arsenic and nitrate removal. Water Res 38(8):2053–2062

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kumar PR, Chaudhari S, Khilar KC, Mahajan SP (2004) Removal of arsenic from water by electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 55(9):1245–1252

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ning RY (2002) Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 143(3):237–241

    Google Scholar 

  85. Abbas A, Al-Amer AM, Laoui T, Al-Marri MJ, Nasser MS, Khraisheh M, Atieh MA (2016) Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution by advanced carbon nanotubes: critical review of adsorption applications. Sep Purif Technol 157:141–161

    Google Scholar 

  86. Baskar AV, Bolan N, Hoang SA, Sooriyakumar P, Kumar M, Singh L, Jasemizad T, Padhye LP, Singh G, Vinu A, Sarkar B, Kirkham MB, Rinklebe J, Wang S, Wang H, Balasubramanian R, Siddique KHM (2022) Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: a review. Sci Total Environ 822:153555

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kim EJ, Lee CS, Chang YY, Chang YS (2013) Hierarchically structured manganese oxide-coated magnetic nanocomposites for the efficient removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(19):9628–9634

    Google Scholar 

  88. Gupta RK, Dunderdale GJ, England MW, Hozumi A (2017) Oil/water separation techniques: a review of recent progresses and future directions. J Mat Chem A 5(31):16025–16058

    Google Scholar 

  89. Alijani H, Shariatinia Z (2018) Synthesis of high growth rate SWCNTs and their magnetite cobalt sulfidenanohybrid as super-adsorbent for mercury removal. Chem Eng Res Des 129:132–149

    Google Scholar 

  90. Anitha K, Namsani S, Singh JK (2015) Removal of heavy metal ions using a functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem 119(30):8349–8358

    Google Scholar 

  91. Zazouli MA, Yousefi Z, Yazdani Cherati J, Tabarinia H, Tabarinia F, Akbari Adergani B (2014) Evaluation of L-Cysteine functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on mercury removal from aqueous solutions. J Maz Univ Med Sci 24(111):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gupta S, Bhatiya D, Murthy CN (2015) Metal removal studies by composite membrane of polysulfone and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Sep Sci Technol 50(3):421–429

    Google Scholar 

  93. Dehghani MH, Yetilmezsoy K, Salari M, Heidarinejad Z, Yousefi M, Sillanpää M (2020) Adsorptive removal of cobalt (II) from aqueous solutions using multi-walled carbon nanotubes and γ-alumina as novel adsorbents: modelling and optimization based on response surface methodology and artificial neural network. J Mol Liq 299:112154

    Google Scholar 

  94. Xu Z, Liu H, Niu J, Zhou Y, Wang C, Wang Y (2017) Hydroxyl multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified nanocrystalline PbO2 anode for removal of pyridine from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 327:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  95. Li H, Ha CS, Kim I (2009) Fabrication of carbon nanotube/SiO2 and carbon nanotube/SiO2/Ag nanoparticles hybrids by using plasma treatment. Nanoscale Res Lett 4(11):1384–1388

    Google Scholar 

  96. Zhao X, Jia Q, Song N, Zhou W, Li Y (2010) Adsorption of Pb (II) from an aqueous solution by titanium dioxide/carbon nanotube nanocomposites: kinetics, thermodynamics, and isotherms. J Chem Eng Data 55(10):4428–4433.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Saifullah B, Chrzastek A, Maitra A, Naeemullah B, Fakurazi S, Bhakta S, Hussein MZ (2017) Novel anti-tuberculosis nanodelivery formulation of ethambutol with graphene oxide. Molecules 22(10):1560

    Google Scholar 

  98. Elsehly EM, Chechenin NG, Bukunov KA, Makunin AV, Priselkova AB, Vorobyeva EA, Motaweh HA (2016) Removal of iron and manganese from aqueous solutions using carbon nanotube filters. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16(2):347–353

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wang Z, Xu W, Jie F, Zhao Z, Zhou K, Liu H (2021) The selective adsorption performance and mechanism of multiwall magnetic carbon nanotubes for heavy metals in wastewater. Sci Rep 11(1):16878

    Google Scholar 

  100. Veličković ZS, Marinković AD, Bajić ZJ, Marković JM, Perić-Grujić AA, Uskokovic PS, Ristic MD (2013) Oxidized and ethylenediamine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the separation of low concentration arsenate from water. Sep Sci Technol 48(13):2047–2058

    Google Scholar 

  101. Tofighy MA, Mohammadi T (2011) Adsorption of divalent heavy metal ions from water using carbon nanotube sheets. J Hazard Mater 185(1):140–147

    Google Scholar 

  102. Bandaru NM, Reta N, Dalal H, Ellis AV, Shapter J, Voelcker NH (2013) Enhanced adsorption of mercury ions on thiol derivatized single wall carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 261:534–541

    Google Scholar 

  103. Zhang Q, Vigier KD, Royer S, Jérôme F (2012) Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 41(21):7108–7146

    Google Scholar 

  104. Mahesh N, Balakumar S, Shyamalagowri S, Manjunathan J, Pavithra MKS, Babu PS, Kamaraj M, Govarthanan M (2022) Carbon-based adsorbents as proficient tools for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution: a state of art-review emphasizing recent progress and prospects. Environ Res 213:113723

    Google Scholar 

  105. Li ZX, Li XH, Kinny PD, Wang J, Zhang S, Zhou H (2003) Geochronology of Neoproterozoic syn-rift magmatism in the Yangtze Craton, South China and correlations with other continents: evidence for a mantle superplume that broke up Rodinia. Precambr Res 122(1–4):85–109

    Google Scholar 

  106. Li J, Zhang G, Qi S, Li X, Peng X (2006) Concentrations, enantiomeric compositions, and sources of HCH, DDT and chlordane in soils from the Pearl River Delta, South China. Sci Total Environ 372(1):215–224

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lu G, Ocola LE, Chen J (2009) Reduced graphene oxide for roomtemperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 20(44):445502

    Google Scholar 

  108. Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL, Ruane AC, Boote KJ, Thorburn P, Antle JM, Nelson GC, Porter C, Janssen S, Asseng S (2013) The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166–182

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wang Y, Jodoin PM, Porikli F, Konrad J, Benezeth Y, Ishwar P (2014) CDnet 2014: An expanded change detection benchmark dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 387–394

    Google Scholar 

  110. Zong P, Gou J (2014) Rapid and economical synthesis of magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotube/iron oxide composite and its application in preconcentration of U (VI). J Mol Liq 195:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  111. Zhou J (2014) Multicatalyst system in asymmetric catalysis. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  112. **e W, Lv X, Ye L, Zhou P, Yu H (2015) Construction of lycopeneoverproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by combining directed evolution and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 30:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  113. Yaghmaeian K, Khosravi Mashizi R, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Alimohammadi M, Nazmara S (2015) Removal of inorganic mercury from aquatic environments by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Environ Health Sci Eng 13:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  114. Sobhanardakani S, Zandipak R (2015) 2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine functionalized sodium dodecyl sulfate-coated magnetite nanoparticles for effective removal of Cd (II) and Ni (II) ions from water samples. Environ Monit Assess 187:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  115. Al Osman M, Yang F, Massey IY (2019) Exposure routes and health effects of heavy metals on children. Biometals 32:563–573

    Google Scholar 

  116. Bankole MT, Abdulkareem AS, Mohammed IA, Ochigbo SS, Tijani JO, Abubakre OK, Roos WD (2019) Selected heavy metals removal from electroplating wastewater by purified and polyhydroxylbutyrate functionalized carbon nanotubes adsorbents. Sci Rep 9(1):4475

    Google Scholar 

  117. Alshahrani B, Olarinoye IO, Mutuwong C, Sriwunkum C, Yakout HA, Tekin HO, Al-Buriahi MS (2021) Amorphous alloys with high Fe content for radiation shielding applications. Radiat Phys Chem 183:109386

    Google Scholar 

  118. Chen C, Feng X, Yao S (2021) Ionic liquid-multi walled carbon nanotubes composite tablet for continuous adsorption of tetracyclines and heavy metals. J Cleaner Prod 286:124937

    Google Scholar 

  119. Šolić M, Maletić S, Isakovski MK, Nikić J, Watson M, Kónya Z, Rončević S (2021) Removing low levels of Cd (II) and Pb (II) by adsorption on two types of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105402

    Google Scholar 

  120. Mpouras T, Polydera A, Dermatas D, Verdone N, Vilardi G (2021) Multi wall carbon nanotubes application for treatment of Cr (VI)-contaminated groundwater; Modeling of batch & column experiments. Chemosphere 269:128749

    Google Scholar 

  121. Saleh TA, Elsharif AM, Bin-Dahman OA (2021) Synthesis of amine functionalization carbon nanotube-low symmetry porphyrin derivatives conjugates toward dye and metal ions removal. J Mol Liq 340:117024

    Google Scholar 

  122. Lin Y, Huang R, Sun X, Yu X, **ao Y, Wang L, Hu W, Zhong T (2021) The p-Anisaldehyde/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes as fumigation agent for control of postharvest decay and quality of strawberry. Food Control 130:108346

    Google Scholar 

  123. Sharifi P, Bidabadi SS, Zaid A, Latef AA (2021) Efficacy of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in regulating growth performance, total glutathione and redox state of Calendula officinalis L. cultivated on Pb and Cd polluted soil. Ecotoxicol Environmen Saf 213:112051

    Google Scholar 

  124. Qu G, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Jia Q, Zhang W, Yan B (2009) The effect of multiwalled carbon nanotube agglomeration on their accumulation in and damage to organs in mice. Carbon 47(8):2060–2069

    Google Scholar 

  125. Egbosiuba TC, Egwunyenga MC, Tijani JO, Mustapha S, Abdulkareem AS, Kovo AS, Krikstolaityte V, Veksha A, Wagner M, Lisak G (2022) Activated multi-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with zero valent nickel nanoparticles for arsenic, cadmium and lead adsorption from wastewater in a batch and continuous flow modes. J Hazard Mat 423:126993

    Google Scholar 

  126. Shahryari T, Singh P, Raizada P, Davidyants A, Thangavelu L, Sivamani S, Naseri A, Vahidipour F, Ivanets A, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A (2022) Adsorption properties of Danthron-impregnated carbon nanotubes and their usage for solid phase extraction of heavy metal ions. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 641:128528

    Google Scholar 

  127. Zhang L, Liang J, Yue L, Xu Z, Dong K, Liu Q, Luo Y, Li T, Cheng X, Cui G, Tang B (2022) N-doped carbon nanotubes supported CoSe2 nanoparticles: a highly efficient and stable catalyst for H2O2 electrosynthesis in acidic media. Nano Res 15(1):304–309

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ghanavati B, Bozorgian A, Esfeh HK (2022) Thermodynamic and kinetic study of adsorption of cobalt II using adsorbent of magnesium oxide nano-particles deposited on chitosan. Prog Chem Biochem Res 5(2)

    Google Scholar 

  129. Hoang AT, Nižetić S, Cheng CK, Luque R, Thomas S, Banh TL, Nguyen XP (2022) Heavy metal removal by biomass-derived carbon nanotubes as a greener environmental remediation: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 287:131959

    Google Scholar 

  130. Wang Q, Feng X, Liu Y, Cui W, Sun Y, Zhang S, Wang F (2022) Effects of microplastics and carbon nanotubes on soil geochemical properties and bacterial communities. J Hazard Mater 433:128826

    Google Scholar 

  131. AlOmar MK, Alsaadi MA, Hayyan M, Akib S, Ibrahim M, Hashim MA (2017) Allyl triphenyl phosphonium bromide based DES-functionalized carbon nanotubes for the removal of mercury from water. Chemosphere 167:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  132. Churilov GN (2008) Synthesis of fullerenes and other nanomaterials in arc discharge. Fuller, Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 16(5–6):395–403

    Google Scholar 

  133. Hawari AH, Mulligan CN (2006) Biosorption of lead (II), cadmium (II), copper (II) and nickel (II) by anaerobic granular biomass. Bioresour Technol 97(4):692–700

    Google Scholar 

  134. Krätschmer W (2011) The story of making fullerenes. Nanoscale 3(6):2485–2489

    Google Scholar 

  135. Krätschmer W, Lamb LD, Fostiropoulos K, Huffman DR (1990) Solid C60: a new form of carbon. Nature 347(6291):354–358

    Google Scholar 

  136. Mracek JD, Fagan RM, Stengelin R, Hesjedal T (2011) Are carbon nanotubes a naturally occurring material? hints from methane CVD using lava as a catalyst. Curr Nano sci 7(3):294–296

    Google Scholar 

  137. Vidu R, Rahman M, Mahmoudi M, Enachescu M, Poteca TD, Opris I (2014) Nanostructures: a platform for brain repair and augmentation. Front Syst Neurosci 8:91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kundan Kumar Chaubey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tyagi, S. et al. (2023). Development Strategies and Prospects of Carbon Nanotube as Heavy Metal Adsorbent. In: Bachheti, R.K., Bachheti, A., Husen, A. (eds) Nanomaterials for Environmental and Agricultural Sectors. Smart Nanomaterials Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2874-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation