Abstract
The growing acceptance of electric vehicles across the globe is the main factor driving the trend toward mobile electrification, which has resulted in an unparalleled increase in the demand for lithium-ion batteries. Consequently, it is now more important than ever to recycle batteries. The lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery is being explored as a potential replacement for the present lithium-ion battery. It releases energy by combining lithium metal with highly plentiful sulfur. The Li-S battery can obtain a high theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mAh/g and specific energy of 2600 Wh/kg due to the sulfur cathode’s lightweight and multi-electron reaction. The “shuttle effect” of lithium polysulfides, significant volume changes, weak conductivity of sulfur and its solid-state derivatives, and the self-discharge phenomenon, on the other hand, restrict its practical utilization. The “shuttle effect” is acknowledged as the most significant issue influencing electrochemical performance out of all of these. Some of these techniques have shown early promise, but more work is required to reach a high enough performance level so that lithium metal may be employed in commercial Li-S cells. In this chapter, we examine the advantages and disadvantages of numerous suggested approaches to these problems, kee** in mind the constant objective of outperforming traditional Li-ion energy densities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agostini M, Hwang JY, Kim HM, Bruni P, Brutti S, Croce F, . . . Sun YK (2018) Minimizing the electrolyte volume in Li–S batteries: a step forward to high gravimetric energy density. Adv Energy Mater 8(26):1801560
Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8(3):902–907. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0731872
Bresser D, Passerini S, Scrosati B (2013) Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries–a review. Chem Commun 49(90):10545–10562
Bucur CB, Jones M, Kopylov M, Spear J, Muldoon J (2017) Inorganic–organic layer by layer hybrid membranes for lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 10(4):905–911
Cheng X-B, Yan C, Huang J-Q, Li P., Zhu L, Zhao L, . . . Zhang Q (2017) The gap between long lifespan Li–S coin and pouch cells: the importance of lithium metal anode protection. Energy Storage Mater 6:18–25
Chung S-H, Chang C-H, Manthiram A (2016) A carbon-cotton cathode with ultrahigh-loading capability for statically and dynamically stable lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 10(11):10462–10470
Etacheri V, Marom R, Elazari R, Salitra G, Aurbach D (2011) Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review. Energy Environ Sci 4(9):3243–3262
Fan FY, Chiang Y-M (2017) Electrodeposition kinetics in Li–S batteries: effects of low electrolyte/sulfur ratios and deposition surface composition. J Electrochem Soc 164(4):A917
Fan FY, Carter WC, Chiang YM (2015) Mechanism and kinetics of Li2S precipitation in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27(35):5203–5209
Fan FY, Pan MS, Lau KC, Assary RS, Woodford WH, Curtiss LA, . . . Chiang Y-M (2016) Solvent effects on polysulfide redox kinetics and ionic conductivity in lithium-sulfur batteries. J Electrochem Soc 163(14):A3111
Fang R, Zhao S, Hou P, Cheng M, Wang S, Cheng HM, . . . Li F (2016) 3D interconnected electrode materials with ultrahigh areal sulfur loading for Li–S batteries. Adv Mater 28(17):3374–3382
Frischmann PD, Hwa Y, Cairns EJ, Helms BA (2016) Redox-active supramolecular polymer binders for lithium–sulfur batteries that adapt their transport properties in operando. Chem Mater 28(20):7414–7421
Goodenough JB (2013) Evolution of strategies for modern rechargeable batteries. Acc Chem Res 46(5):1053–1061
Haubner K, Murawski J, Olk P, Eng LM, Ziegler C, Adolphi B, Jaehne E (2010) The route to functional graphene oxide. ChemPhysChem 11(10):2131–2139
Kang W, Deng N, Ju J, Li Q, Wu D, Ma X, . . . Cheng B (2016) A review of recent developments in rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 8(37):16541–16588
Kong L, ** Q, Huang JQ, Zhao LD, Li P, Li BQ, . . . Zhang Q (2019) Nonuniform redistribution of sulfur and lithium upon cycling: probing the origin of capacity fading in lithium–sulfur pouch cells. Energ Technol 7(12):1900111
Li W, Cha J, Zheng G, Yang Y, McDowell M, Hsu P, Cui Y (2013) Sulphur-TiO2 yolk-shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat Commun 4:1331–1331
Li BQ, Kong L, Zhao CX, ** Q, Chen X, Peng HJ, . . . Zhang Q (2019a) Expediting redox kinetics of sulfur species by atomic-scale electrocatalysts in lithium–sulfur batteries. InfoMat 1(4):533–541
Li B-Q, Peng H-J, Chen X, Zhang S-Y, **e J, Zhao C-X, Zhang Q (2019b) Polysulfide electrocatalysis on framework porphyrin in high-capacity and high-stable lithium–sulfur batteries. CCS Chem 1(1):128–137
Li Y, Shapter JG, Cheng H, Xu G, Gao G (2021) Recent progress in sulfur cathodes for application to lithium–sulfur batteries. Particuology 58:1–15
Lin D, Liu Y, Cui Y (2017) Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat Nanotechnol 12(3):194–206
Manthiram A, Chung SH, Zu C (2015) Lithium–sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Adv Mater 27(12):1980–2006
Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth T, Khotkevich V, Morozov S, Geim AK (2005) Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(30):10451–10453
Park J-W, Ueno K, Tachikawa N, Dokko K, Watanabe M (2013) Ionic liquid electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Phys Chem C 117(40):20531–20541
Park H, Lim H-D, Lim H-K, Seong WM, Moon S, Ko Y, . . . Kang K (2017) High-efficiency and high-power rechargeable lithium–sulfur dioxide batteries exploiting conventional carbonate-based electrolytes. Nat Commun 8(1):1–10
Peng H-J, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q (2017) A review of flexible lithium–sulfur and analogous alkali metal–chalcogen rechargeable batteries. Chem Soc Rev 46(17):5237–5288
Qi B, Zhao X, Wang S, Chen K, Wei Y, Chen G, . . . Li F (2018) Mesoporous TiN microspheres as an efficient polysulfide barrier for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 6(29):14359–14366
Rana M, Li M, Huang X, Luo B, Gentle I, Knibbe R (2019) Recent advances in separators to mitigate technical challenges associated with re-chargeable lithium sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 7(12):6596–6615
Song B, Wang T, Sun H, Shao Q, Zhao J, Song K, . . . Guo Z (2017) Two-step hydrothermally synthesized carbon nanodots/WO 3 photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Dalton Trans 46(45):15769–15777
Wang H, Zhang W, Liu H, Guo Z (2016) A strategy for configuration of an integrated flexible sulfur cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(12):3992–3996
Wang C, Zhao M, Li J, Yu J, Sun S, Ge S, . . . Wujcik EK (2017) Silver nanoparticles/graphene oxide decorated carbon fiber synergistic reinforcement in epoxy-based composites. Polymer 131:263–271
Wang X, Liu X, Yuan H, Liu H, Liu C, Li T, . . . Guo Z (2018a) Non-covalently functionalized graphene strengthened poly (vinyl alcohol). Mater Des 139:372–379
Wang L, Ye Y, Chen N, Huang Y, Li L, Wu F, Chen R (2018b) Development and challenges of functional electrolytes for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28(38):1800919
Weller C, Pampel J, Dörfler S, Althues H, Kaskel S (2019) Polysulfide shuttle suppression by electrolytes with low-density for high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Energ Technol 7(12):1900625
Yu X, Manthiram A (2017) Electrode–electrolyte interfaces in lithium–sulfur batteries with liquid or inorganic solid electrolytes. Acc Chem Res 50(11):2653–2660
Yuan Z, Peng H-J, Hou T-Z, Huang J-Q, Chen C-M, Wang D-W, . . . Zhang, Q (2016) Powering lithium–sulfur battery performance by propelling polysulfide redox at sulfiphilic hosts. Nano Lett 16(1):519–527
Zhang S, Ueno K, Dokko K, Watanabe M (2015) Recent advances in electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5(16):1500117
Zhang Y, Gao Z, Song N, He J, Li X (2018a) Graphene and its derivatives in lithium–sulfur batteries. Mater Today Energy 9:319–335
Zhang G, Peng HJ, Zhao CZ, Chen X, Zhao LD, Li P, . . . Zhang Q (2018b) The radical pathway based on a lithium-metal-compatible high-dielectric electrolyte for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem 130(51):16974–16978
Zhao M, Li B-Q, Zhang X-Q, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q (2020) A perspective toward practical lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Cent Sci 6(7):1095–1104
Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22(35):3906–3924
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khalid, I., Sagir, M., Tahir, M.B. (2024). Challenges and Future Perspectives of Li–S Batteries. In: Tahir, M.S., Tahir, M.B., Sagir, M., Asiri, A.M. (eds) Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Key Parameters, Recent Advances, Challenges and Applications. Springer Tracts in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2796-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2796-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2795-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2796-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)