Pressure Transient Characteristics of Highly Deviated Wells in Fractured-Vuggy Carbonate Gas Reservoirs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2021 (IFEDC 2021)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

More and more attention has been paid to the study of flow properties in fractured-vuggy reservoirs because lots of such reservoirs have been found worldwide with significant gas production and reserves. In order to improve carbonate gas reservoir production, highly deviated wells (HDW) are widely used in the field. However, it is very difficult to consider the complex pore structure of fractured-vuggy reservoirs and evaluate the pressure transient behaviors of HDW. This paper presents a semi-analytical model that analyzed the pressure behavior of HDW in fractured-vuggy carbonate gas reservoirs which consist of fractures, vugs and matrix. Introducing pseudo-pressure; Fourier transformation, Laplace transformation, and Stehfest numerical inversion were employed to establish a point source and line source solutions. Furthermore, the validity of the proposed model was verified by comparing with two existing pressure transient models. Then the flow characteristics were analyzed thoroughly by examining the pressure derivative curve which can be divided into five flow stages. The physical meanings of the model parameters were analyzed through sensitivity analysis. Finally, a field case was successfully used to show the application of the proposed semi-analytical model. The study contributes to the highly efficient evaluation of the pressure transient behaviors for HDW in fractured-vuggy carbonate gas reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(C\) :

Wellbore storage coefficient, \(m^{3} /MPa\)

\(C_{t}\) :

Total Compressibility, \(MPa^{ - 1}\)

\(h\) :

Formation thickness, \(m\)

\(k\) :

Permeability, \(md\)

\(L_{w}\) :

High deviated well length, \(m\)

\(m\) :

Pseudo pressure, \(MPa\)

\(m_{w}\) :

Well bottom-hole pseudo pressure, \(MPa\)

\(p\) :

Pressure, \(MPa\)

\(p_{wf}\) :

Well bottom-hole pressure, \(MPa\)

\(p_{sc}\) :

Pressure at standard condition, \(MPa\)

\(\widetilde{q}\) :

Production rate from point source, \(m^{3} /d\)

\(q_{g}\) :

Gas production rate, \(m^{3} /d\)

\(q_{gj}\) :

Simulated production rate from the proposed model, \(m^{3} /d\)

\(\mathop {q_{gj} }\limits^{\sim }\) :

Field production rate, \(m^{3} /d\)

\(r\) :

Radial distance, \(m\)

\(r_{w}\) :

Wellbore radius, \(m\)

\(r_{e}\) :

Formation radius, \(m\)

\(S\) :

Skin factor

\(s\) :

Laplace transform variable

\(t\) :

Time, day

\(T\) :

Reservoir temperature, \(k\)

\(T_{sc}\) :

Temperature at standard condition, \(k\)

\(x,y,z\) :

Directional coordinates

\(x_{w} ,y_{w} ,z_{w}\) :

Distance of mid-perforation in x, y and z coordinates, \(m\)

\(Z\) :

Z-factor of gas, dimensionless

\(\alpha_{c} ,\alpha_{m}\) :

Shape factors of vugs and matrix, \({1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {m^{2} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {m^{2} }}\)

\(\lambda\) :

Interporosity flow coefficient, dimensionless

\(\omega\) :

Storativity ratio, dimensionless

\(\theta\) :

Inclination angle, degree

\(\phi\) :

Porosity, fraction

\(\mu_{g}\) :

Gas viscosity, \(mPa \cdot s\)

\(\alpha_{p}\) :

Constant, \(\alpha_{p} = 1.842\)

\(c\) :

Vugs system

\(f\) :

Fractures system

\(m\) :

Matrix system

\(h\) :

Horizontal direction

\(i\) :

Initial condition

\(j\) :

Initial condition

\(v\) :

Vertical direction

\(D\) :

Dimensionless

\(\overline{{~}}\) :

Laplace domain

\(\widehat{{~}}\) :

Fourier domain

\(\sim\) :

Field production data

References

  1. Li, Y., Wang, Q., Li, B.Z., Liu, Z.L.: Dynamic characterization of different reservoir types for a fractured-caved carbonate reservoir. In: SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, SPE-188113-MS, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghahri, P., Jamiolahmady, M.: A new, accurate and simple model for calculation of productivity of deviated and highly deviated well–Part I: single-phase incompressible and compressible fluid. Fuel 97, 24–37 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren, J.E., Root, P.J.: The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE J. 3(3), 245–255 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abdassah, D., Ershaghi, I.: Triple-porosity systems for representing naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Form. Eval. 1(2), 113–127 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Camacho-Velazquez, R., Vasquez-Cruz, M., Castrejon-Aivar, R., et al.: Pressure transient and decline curve behaviors in naturally fractured vuggy carbonate reservoirs. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-77689-MS, San Antonio, Texas, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gulbransen, F., Hauge, V.L., Lie, K.A.: A multiscale mixed finite element method for vuggy and naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE J. 15(2), 395–403 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia, Y.L., Fan, X.Y., Nie, R.S., et al.: Flow modeling of well test analysis for porous-vuggy carbonate reservoirs. Transp. Porous Media 97(2), 253–279 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, F.S., An, M.K., Yan, B.C., et al.: Modeling the depletion of fractured vuggy carbonate reservoir by coupling geomechanics with reservoir flow. In: SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, SPE-186050-MS, Abu Dhabi, UAE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Du, X., Lu, Z.W., Li, D.M., et al.: A novel analytical well test model for fractured vuggy carbonate reservoirs considering the coupling between oil flow and wave propagation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 173, 447–461 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cinco-Ley, H., Ramey Jr., H.J., Miller, F.G.: Pseudo-skin factors for partially-penetrating directionally-drilled wells. In: Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE-5589-MS, Dallas, Texas, USA (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Besson, J.: Performance of slanted and horizontal wells on an anisotropic medium. In: European Petroleum Conference, SPE-20965-MS, The Hague, The Netherlands (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbaszadeh, M., Hegeman, P.S.: Pressure-transient analysis for a slanted well in a reservoir with vertical pressure support. SPE Form. Eval. 5(3), 277–284 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozkan, E., Raghavan, R.: A computationally efficient, transient-pressure solution for inclined wells. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-49085-MS, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meng, F.K., Lei, Q., He, D.B., et al.: Production performance analysis for deviated wells in composite carbonate gas reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 56, 333–343 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong, W.X., Wang, X.D., Wang, J.H.: A new skin factor model for partially penetrated directionally-drilled wells in anisotropic reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 161, 334–348 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, K., et al.: Analysis of gas flow behavior for highly deviated wells in naturally fractured-vuggy carbonate gas reservoirs. Math. Prob. Eng. 2019, 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, L., Chen, X., **a, Z.: A novel semi-analytical model for multi-branched fractures in naturally fractured-vuggy reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 11586 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Hussainy, R., Ramey, H.J., Jr., Crawford, P.B.: The flow of real gases through porous media. J. Petrol. Technol. 18(5), 624–636 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stehfest, H.: Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transforms [D5]. Commun. ACM 13(1), 47–49 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Samuel, G.R., Liu, X.: Advanced Drilling Engineering: Principles and Designs. Gulf Pub, Houston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7(4), 308–313 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Yi Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A. Calculation of Pseudo-pressure

In Eqs. (1)–(7), \(m_{f}\), \(m_{m}\), \(m_{c}\) is the pseudo-pressure of the fracture system, matrix system and vugs system, respectively, \(MPa/s\). The pseudo-pressure can be given as follows:

$$ m = \int_{0}^{p} {\frac{2p}{{\mu_{g} Z}}} dp $$
(A.1)

Appendix B. Calculation of Continuous Point Source Solution

Equations (8)–(14) can be transformed into Laplace domain by the Laplace transformation.

The dimensionless governing equations of fractures, matrix and vugs systems in the Laplace domain are as follows:

$$ \frac{1}{{r_{D} }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial r_{D} }}(r_{D} \frac{{\partial \overline{m}_{fD} }}{{\partial r_{D} }}) + \frac{{\partial^{2} \overline{m}_{fD} }}{{\partial z_{D}^{2} }} = \omega_{f} s\overline{m}_{fD} - \lambda_{m} (\overline{m}_{mD} - \overline{m}_{fD} ) - \lambda_{c} (\overline{m}_{cD} - \overline{m}_{fD} ) $$
(B.1)
$$ \omega_{m} s\overline{m}_{mD} = \lambda_{m} (\overline{m}_{fD} - \overline{m}_{mD} ) $$
(B.2)
$$ \omega_{c} s\overline{m}_{cD} = \lambda_{c} (\overline{m}_{fD} - \overline{m}_{cD} ) $$
(B.3)

The outer boundary condition is transformed as:

$$ \left. {\frac{{\partial \overline{m}_{jD} }}{{\partial r_{D} }}} \right|_{{r_{D} = r_{eD} }} = 0,\;\;\;(j = f,m,c) $$
(B.4)

The inner boundary condition is transformed as:

$$ \begin{array}{*{20}l} {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{{\varepsilon_{D} \to 0}} \left( {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{{r_{D} \to 0}} \int_{{z_{wD} - {{\varepsilon_{D} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\varepsilon_{D} } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}^{{z_{{w_{D} }} + {{\varepsilon_{D} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\varepsilon_{D} } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}} {r_{D} \frac{{\partial \overline{m}_{fD} }}{{\partial r_{D} }}dz_{D} } } \right) = \left\{ \begin{gathered} - \frac{{h_{D} }}{s} \hfill \\ 0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.\;\;\;} \hfill & \begin{gathered} \left| {z_{D} - z_{wD} } \right| \le {{\varepsilon_{D} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\varepsilon_{D} } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} \hfill \\ \left| {z_{D} - z_{wD} } \right|{{ > \varepsilon_{D} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ > \varepsilon_{D} } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \hfill \\ \end{array} $$
(B.5)

The top and bottom boundaries are transformed as:

$$ \left. {\frac{{\partial \overline{m}_{fD} }}{{\partial z_{D} }}} \right|_{{z_{D} = 0}} = \left. {\frac{{\partial \overline{m}_{fD} }}{{\partial z_{D} }}} \right|_{{z_{D} = h_{D} }} = 0 $$
(B.6)

Where

$$ \overline{m}_{jD} = \int_{0}^{\infty } {e^{{ - st_{D} }} m_{jD} (t_{D} } )dt_{D} ,\;\;\;(j = f,m,c) $$
(B.7)

To eliminate the variable \(z_{D}\) in the governing equation, Eqs. (B.1)–(B.5) can be transformed by Fourier cosine transform. The Fourier cosine transform and inverse Fourier cosine transform are given as follows:

$$ \widehat{m}_{jD} = \int_{0}^{{h_{D} }} {m_{jD} \cos \left( {\frac{{n\pi z_{D} }}{{h_{D} }}} \right)} dh_{D} ,\;\;\;(j = f,m,c) $$
(B.8)
$$ m_{jD} = \sum\limits_{n} {\widehat{m}_{jD} \frac{{\cos \left( {\frac{{n\pi z_{D} }}{{h_{D} }}} \right)}}{N(n)}} ,\;\;\;(j = f,m,c) $$
(B.9)

Where

$$ \begin{gathered} \begin{array}{*{20}l} {N(n) = \int_{0}^{{h_{D} }} {\cos^{2} \left( {\frac{{n\pi z_{D} }}{{h{}_{D}}}} \right)dz_{D} } = \left\{ \begin{gathered} h_{D} \hfill \\ \frac{{h_{D} }}{2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.} \hfill & \begin{aligned} & n = 0 \\ & n = 1,2,3 \ldots \\ \end{aligned} \hfill \\ \end{array} \hfill \\ \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(B.10)

By employing the Fourier cosine transform (Eq. (B8)), Eqs. (B.1)–(B.5) can be transformed as follows:

$$ \frac{{d^{2} \widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} }}{{dr_{D}^{2} }} + \frac{1}{{r_{D} }}\frac{{d\widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} }}{{dr_{D} }} - \left[ {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} \right]\widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} = 0 $$
(B.11)

Where

$$ u_{n} = \frac{n\pi }{{h_{D} }} $$
(B.12)
$$ f(s) = w_{f} + \frac{{\lambda_{c} \omega_{c} }}{{\lambda_{c} + \omega_{c} s}} + \frac{{\lambda_{m} \omega_{m} }}{{\lambda_{m} + \omega_{m} s}} $$
(B.13)

The outer boundary condition is transformed as:

$$ \left. {\frac{{\partial \widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{jD} }}{{\partial r_{D} }}} \right|_{{r_{D} = r_{eD} }} = 0,\;\;\;(j = f,m,c) $$
(B.14)

The inner boundary condition is transformed as:

$$ \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{r_{D} \to 0}} r_{D} \frac{{\partial \widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} }}{{\partial r_{D} }} = - \frac{{h_{D} }}{s}\cos (u_{n} z_{wD} ) $$
(B.15)

Then Eq. (B.11) can be transformed to a modified Bessel function of zero order, like this:

$$ \begin{aligned} & \left( {r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} } \right)^{2} \frac{{d^{2} \widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} }}{{d\left( {r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} } \right)^{2} }} \\ & + \,r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} \frac{{d\widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} }}{{d\left( {r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} } \right)}} - r_{D}^{2} \left( {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} \right)\widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} = 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.16)

The general solution of Eq. (B.16) is given as follows:

$$ \widehat{{\overline{m} }}_{fD} = A_{0} I_{0} \left[ {r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} } \right] + B_{0} K_{0} \left[ {r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} } \right] $$
(B.17)

Based on the outer and inner boundary conditions (Eq. (B14)–(B.15)), the solution in Laplace domain can be obtained by inverse Fourier cosine transform as follows:

$$ \begin{aligned} \overline{m} _{{fD}} = & \;\frac{1}{s}\left[ {\frac{{K_{1} (r_{{eD}} \sqrt {sf(s)} )}}{{I_{1} (r_{{eD}} \sqrt {sf(s)} )}}I_{0} (r_{D} \sqrt {sf(s)} ) + K_{0} (r_{D} \sqrt {sf(s)} )} \right] \\ & + \,\frac{2}{s}\sum\limits_{{n = 1}}^{\infty } {\left[ {\frac{{K_{1} (r_{{eD}} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} )}}{{I_{1} (r_{{eD}} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} )}}I_{0} (r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} )} \right.} \\ & \left. { + \;\;K_{0} (r_{D} \sqrt {u_{n}^{2} + sf(s)} )} \right]\cos (\mu _{n} z_{{wD}} )\cos (\mu _{n} z_{D} ) \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.18)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, YY., Li, SS., Li, L. (2022). Pressure Transient Characteristics of Highly Deviated Wells in Fractured-Vuggy Carbonate Gas Reservoirs. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2021. IFEDC 2021. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2149-0_160

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation