Joyful Jaccard: An Analysis of Jaccard-Based Similarity Measures in Collaborative Recommendations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 836))

  • 292 Accesses

Abstract

Recommender systems (RSs) are utilized by various e-commerce giants such as Amazon, YouTube and Netflix for providing a personalized experience to the individual users. For this reason, it has become very important to develop and use efficient techniques to provide recommendations. Neighborhood-based collaborative filtering approaches are traditional techniques for recommendations and are very popular due to their simplicity and efficiency. Neighborhood-based recommender systems use numerous kinds of similarity measures for finding similar users or items. Further, defining novel ways to model the notion of similarity is an active thread of research among RS researchers (by using rating data available in the user-item matrix). This work compares and analyzes the performance of various Jaccard-based similarity measures. Primarily, various Jaccard-based similarity measures are examined with their authoritative definitions. We have conducted various experiments using standardized benchmark datasets (MovieLens-100 K, MovieLens-1 M, and Yahoo music) for assessing the performance of these measures. Empirically obtained results demonstrate that the New Weighted Similarity Measure (NWSM) provides better predictive accuracy among all measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB (2010) Recommender systems handbook, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal CC (2016) Recommender systems: the textbook, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekstrand MD (2011) Collaborative filtering recommender systems. Found. Trends® Human-Comp Int 4(2):81–173

    Google Scholar 

  4. Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM (2009) A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv Artif Intell Section 3:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Proc 14th Conf Uncertain Artif Intell 461(8):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joaquin D, Naohiro I (1999) Memory-based weighted-majority prediction for recommender systems. Res Dev Inf Retr

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura A, Abe N (1998) Collaborative filtering using weighted majority prediction algorithms. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 395–403

    Google Scholar 

  8. Getoor L, Sahami M (1999) Using probabilistic relational models for collaborative filtering. Work Web Usage Anal User Profiling

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marlin B (2003) Modeling user rating profiles for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 627–634

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herlocker JON, Riedl J (2002) An empirical analysis of design choices in neighborhood-based collaborative filtering algorithms. Inf Retr Boston 287–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bobadilla J, Serradilla F, Bernal J (2010) A new collaborative filtering metric that improves the behavior of recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Syst 23(6):520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Arroyo Á (2012) A balanced memory-based collaborative filtering similarity measure. Int J Intell Syst 27(10):939–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bag S, Kumar SK, Tiwari MK (2019) An efficient recommendation generation using relevant Jaccard similarity. Inf Sci (Ny) 483:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu X, Huang Y, Wang S (2017) A new similarity computation method in collaborative filtering based recommendation system. In 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee S (2017) Improving Jaccard index for measuring similarity in collaborative filtering. Inf Sci Appl 2017:799–806

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suryakant, Mahara T (2016) A new similarity measure based on mean measure of divergence for collaborative filtering in sparse environment. Proc Comput Sci 89:450–456

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zang X et al (2017) A new weighted similarity method based on neighborhood user contributions for collaborative filtering. Proc—2016 IEEE 1st Int Conf. Data Sci Cyberspace, DSC 2016, pp 376–381

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Hu Z, Mian A, Tian H, Zhu X (2014) A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Syst 56:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suganeshwari G, Syed Ibrahim SP (2018) A comparison study on similarity measures in collaborative filtering algorithms for movie recommendation. Int J Pure Appl Math 119(15 Special Issue C):1495–1505

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sondur SD, Nayak S, Chigadani AP (2016) Similarity measures for recommender systems: a comparative study. Int J Sci Res Dev 2(3):76–80

    Google Scholar 

  21. Resnick P, Iacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J (1994) Group Lens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp 175–186

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jaccard P (1901) Distribution comparée de la flore alpine dans quelques régions des Alpes occidentales et orientales. Bull la Socit Vaudoise des Sci Nat 37:241–272

    Google Scholar 

  23. Verma V, Aggarwal RK (2019) Accuracy assessment of similarity measures in collaborative recommendations using CF4J framework. Int J Mod Educ Comput Sci 11(5):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortega F, Zhu B, Bobadilla J, Hernando A (2018) CF4J: collaborative filtering for Java. Knowledge-Based Syst 152:94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arsan T, Koksal E, Bozkus Z (2016) Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms with various similarity measures for movie recommendation. Int J Comput Sci Eng Appl 6(3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. Owen S, Anil R, Dunning T, Friedman E (2011) Mahout in action. Manning Publications Co, Greenwich, CT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al Hassanieh L, Jaoudeh CA, Abdo JB, Demerjian J (2018) Similarity measures for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In 2018 IEEE Middle East North Africa Commun. Conf. MENACOMM, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stephen SC, **e H, Rai S (2017) Measures of similarity in memory-based collaborative filtering recommender system—a comparison. ACM Int Conf Proc Ser Part F1296

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun SB et al (2017) Integrating triangle and jaccard similarities for recommendation. PLoS ONE 12(8):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  30. Verma V, Aggarwal RK (2019) A new similarity measure based on simple matching coefficient for improving the accuracy of collaborative recommendations. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci (IJITCS) 6:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  31. Al-bashiri H, Abdulgabber MA, Romli A, Hujainah F (2017) Collaborative filtering similarity measures: revisiting. ACM Int Conf Proc Ser Part F1312:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verma V, Aggarwal RK (2020) A comparative analysis of similarity measures akin to the Jaccard index in collaborative recommendations: empirical and theoretical perspective. Soc Netw Anal Min 10(1)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shardanand U, Maes P (1995) Social information filtering: algorithms for automating ‘Word of Mouth’. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum factors Comput Syst - CHI ’95, pp 210–217

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ahn HJ (2008) A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Inf Sci (Ny) 178(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. MovieLens | GroupLens. [Online]. https://grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/. Accessed 22 Dec 2018

  36. Webscope | Yahoo Labs. [Online]. https://webscope.sandbox.yahoo.com/. Accessed 16 May 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

**dal, A., Sharma, N., Verma, V. (2022). Joyful Jaccard: An Analysis of Jaccard-Based Similarity Measures in Collaborative Recommendations. In: Sanyal, G., Travieso-González, C.M., Awasthi, S., Pinto, C.M.A., Purushothama, B.R. (eds) International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 836. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8542-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation