Identifying Cyberbullying Post on Social Networking Platform Using Machine Learning Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 302))

  • 634 Accesses

Abstract

Online social networking platforms have become a common choice for people to communicate with friends, relatives, or business partners. This allows sharing life achievement, success, and many more. In parallel, it also invited hidden issues such as web-spamming, cyberbullying, cybercrime, and others. This paper addresses the issue of cyberbullying with machine learning models. Three classifiers namely naive bayes, logistic regression, and the random forest were used to develop the model. The experimental outcome confirmed that the random forest classifier is a better choice for the said problem which yielded 93% accuracy for the best case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 234.33
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 299.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 299.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ accessed on 18-02-2020.

  2. 2.

    https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/.

  3. 3.

    https://support.twitter.com/forms/abusiveuser.

  4. 4.

    https://help.instagram.com/165828726894770.

  5. 5.

    https://www.youtube.com/reportabuse.

  6. 6.

    https://support.snapchat.com/en-US/i-need-help.

  7. 7.

    https://www.kaggle.com/dataturks/dataset-for-detection-of-cybertrolls.

References

  1. Cecillon, N., Labatut, V., Dufour, R., Linarès, G.: Abusive language detection in online conversations by combining content-and graph-based features. Front. Big Data 2, 8 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapin, J.: Adolescents and cyber bullying: the precaution adoption process model. Edu. Inf. Technol. 21(4), 719–728 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatzakou, D., Kourtellis, N., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Vakali, A.: Mean birds: detecting aggression and bullying on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, pp. 13–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, L., Li, J., Silva, Y.N., Hall, D.L., Liu, H.: Xbully: cyberbullying detection within a multi-modal context. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 339–347 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dadvar, M., Trieschnigg, D., Ordelman, R., de Jong, F.: Improving cyberbullying detection with user context. In: European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 693–696. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenaughty, J., Harré, N.: Factors associated with distressing electronic harassment and cyberbullying. Comput. Human Behav. 29(3), 803–811 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frommholz, I., Al-Khateeb, H.M., Potthast, M., Ghasem, Z., Shukla, M., Short, E.: On textual analysis and machine learning for cyberstalking detection. Datenbank-Spektrum 16(2), 127–135 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., Spiel, C.: Definition and measurement of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 4(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gregorie, T.M.: Cyberstalking: dangers on the information superhighway. National Center for Victims of crime, pp. 1–9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grigg, D.W.: Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying. J. Psychol. Counsell. Schools 20(2), 143–156 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinduja, S., Patchin, J.W.: Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumari, K., Singh, J.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Aggressive social media post detection system containing symbolic images. In: Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, pp. 415–424. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumari, K., Singh, J.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Towards cyberbullying-free social media in smart cities: a unified multi-modal approach. Soft Comput. 24(15), 11059–11070 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Modecki, K.L., Barber, B.L., Vernon, L.: Map** developmental precursors of cyber-aggression: trajectories of risk predict perpetration and victimization. J. Youth Adolescence 42(5), 651–661 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds, K., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L.: Using machine learning to detect cyberbullying. In: 2011 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops, vol. 2, pp. 241–244. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rybnicek, M., Poisel, R., Tjoa, S.: Facebook watchdog: a research agenda for detecting online grooming and bullying activities. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2854–2859. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salawu, S., He, Y., Lumsden, J.: Approaches to automated detection of cyberbullying: a survey. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, V.K., Ghosh, S., Jose, C.: Toward multimodal cyberbullying detection. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2090–2099 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, V.K., Huang, Q., Atrey, P.K.: Cyberbullying detection using probabilistic socio-textual information fusion. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 884–887. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., Tippett, N.: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(4), 376–385 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Royen, K., Poels, K., Daelemans, W., Vandebosch, H.: Automatic monitoring of cyberbullying on social networking sites: from technological feasibility to desirability. Telemat. Informat. 32(1), 89–97 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ybarra, M.L., Mitchell, K.J., Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D.: Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics 118(4), e1169–e1177 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roy, P.K., Singh, A., Tripathy, A.K., Das, T.K. (2022). Identifying Cyberbullying Post on Social Networking Platform Using Machine Learning Technique. In: Sahoo, J.P., Tripathy, A.K., Mohanty, M., Li, KC., Nayak, A.K. (eds) Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 302. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4807-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation