Ethics: Informed Consent, Patient Privacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Molecular Diagnostics
  • 3064 Accesses

Abstract

Molecular diagnostics has been dependent on genetic or genomic testing or other high-throughput omic technologies and progressed significantly by rapid advances of novel technologies and bioinformatics during the last decade of intensive research. It is now has been moved on to the clinical implication in the diagnosis, individual-level treatment regimens, prognosis, as well as risk assessment and disease prevention [1–3]. In the meanwhile, consumer genomics companies who provide the direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing services are rapidly emerging [4]. Notably, ethical issue, an important topic of debate crossing the fields such as sociology, psychology, and legal issues, is naturally arising and should be carefully considered while the exciting achievement that the field collectively has made [5, 6]. For example, given by the certain features of genetic or genomic information which differentiated it from other medical data, a by-product of genetic testing and secondary or incidental findings of genomic testing are beyond the scope of traditional informed consent. Also, the acquired data for biobank repositories and accompanying databases would make the sensitive information of individual patient to be potentially identifiable. Thus, a comprehensive review of these issues and the establishment of a new protocol or procedure adapted to the current laws and regulations in the field of molecular diagnostics are urgently needed. This chapter will review and discuss the key ethical issues including informed consent and patient privacy during the performance of such testing. We hope these discussions will lead to future standard principles in the course of medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 192.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 267.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shendure J, Findlay GM, Snyder MW. Genomic medicine-progress, pitfalls, and promise. Cell. 2019;177:45–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boycott KM, Hartley T, Biesecker LG, et al. A diagnosis for all rare genetic diseases: the horizon and the next frontiers. Cell. 2019;177:32–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Directors ABo. Clinical utility of genetic and genomic services: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2015;17:505–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allyse MA, Robinson DH, Ferber MJ, et al. Direct-to-consumer testing 2.0: emerging models of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos E, Weissman SM. The dawn of consumer-directed testing. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Directors ABo. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a revised position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2016;18:207–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Appelbaum PS. Clinical practice. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3660–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunnik EM, Schermer MH, Janssens AC. The role of disease characteristics in the ethical debate on personal genome testing. BMC Med Genomics. 2012;5:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korngiebel DM, Zech JM, Chappelle A, et al. Practice implications of expanded genetic testing in oncology. Cancer Invest. 2019;37:39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marron JM, Joffe S. Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders. Blood. 2017;130:460–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishimura AA, Shirts BH, Dorschner MO, et al. Development of clinical decision support alerts for pharmacogenomic incidental findings from exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17:939–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorschner MO, Amendola LM, Turner EH, et al. Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants’ exomes. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:631–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Punj S, Akkari Y, Huang J, et al. Preconception carrier screening by genome sequencing: results from the clinical laboratory. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:1078–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Manrai AK, Funke BH, Rehm HL, et al. Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:655–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohno-Machado L, Farcas C, Kim J, et al. Genomes in the cloud: balancing privacy rights and the public good. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013;2013:128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Directors ABo. Points to consider for informed consent for genome/exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:748–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Directors ABo. ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17:68–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:1233–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Heart Lung, Blood Institute Working Group, Fabsitz RR, et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:574–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGuire AL, Beskow LM. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:361–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Molster CM, Bowman FL, Bilkey GA, et al. The evolution of public health genomics: exploring its past, present, and future. Front Public Health. 2018;6:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takashima K, Maru Y, Mori S, et al. Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients’ family members. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bunnik EM, Janssens AC, Schermer MH. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent. Bioethics. 2014;28:343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Braverman G, Shapiro ZE, Bernstein JA. Ethical issues in contemporary clinical genetics. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018;2:81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e012443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prince AE, Roche MI. Genetic information, non-discrimination, and privacy protections in genetic counseling practice. J Genet Couns. 2014;23:891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taitsman JK, Grimm CM, Agrawal S. Protecting patient privacy and data security. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:977–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghe Meng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meng, Q., Qian, X. (2021). Ethics: Informed Consent, Patient Privacy. In: Pan, S., Tang, J. (eds) Clinical Molecular Diagnostics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1037-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1037-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1036-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1037-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation