Research and Field Test on Intelligent Injection of Mixed Natural Gas Hydrate Inhibitors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2020 (IFEDC 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the severe winter climate conditions in northern China, gas wells and pipelines are at high risk of gas hydrate blockage. In order to ensure stable gas supply in winter, the required Methanol injection concentrations are as high as 30–60 wt% of water rates in Daqing gas wells. As increasing in the water-gas ratio, large quantities of Methanol are injected into wells through Methanol injection lines. However, there are some drawbacks in the current Methanol injection process, including huge Methanol consumptions, high operating costs, large loads of the pum** system, and long residence time of Methanol in injection pipelines. In addition, large amounts of Methanol injected into well bottom will inevitably affect the liquid entrainment capacity of gas wells. Therefore, to reduce Methanol injection quantities and improve the inhibitor injection efficiency, this paper carries out a research and field test on the intelligent injection technology of mixed natural gas hydrate inhibitors. The Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor PVCap and Methanol are mixed to study methane hydrate formation temperature under the operating pressure of 5 MPa and rotating speed of 20 r/min. The results show that the critical temperature of hydrate formation can be reduced to 0.89 ℃ and induction time can be extended to 6330 s when 1 wt% PVCap and 5 wt% Methanol were mixed, which meets the safety transportation requirements between gas wells and gathering stations. Meanwhile, an intelligent inhibitor injection device has been developed, which can inject low dose mixed inhibitors continuously and can automatically adjust the injection rates by real-time monitoring and analyzing wellhead temperatures, pressures, and water productions. The technology has been tested in a hydrate-plugged gas well X. Before the test, the well cannot be opened, the opening time was 0 in 2018, which affected the annual production capacity of 450 × 10m3. In the field test, the injection rates of the mixed inhibitors are 0–15 L/h, gas well X resumes production successfully. Compared with the traditional process, Methanol consumption is reduced by more than 80%. The manual replenishment cycle of inhibitors can be up to 15 days, and the maintenance workload is reduced by 93.3%, which is of great significance to the construction of the digital gas field in Daqing Oilfield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu, W., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Sun, B., et al.: Methane hydrate formation in a water-continuous vertical flow loop with xanthan gum. Fuel 265, 116963 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Talaghat, M.R.: Experimental investigation of induction time for binary mixtures during gas hydrate formation in the simultaneous presence of the PVP and L-Tyrosine as kinetic inhibitors in a flow mini-loop apparatus (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sergey, S., Zachary, A., Sanjee, J., et al.: Measurements to characterize the pluggability of crude oils. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sloan, E.D., Koh, C.A., Sum, A.K.: Hydrates: state of the art inside and outside flowlines. J. Petrol. Technol. 61(12), 89–94 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gbaruko, B.C.: Asphaltenes, oil recovery and down-Hole upgrading in the Nigerian petroleum industry. In: Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, vol. 228, p. 1155 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glénat, P., Saha, P., Macpherson, C., et al.: Field tests results of production inside hydrate P&T zone using new hydrate monitoring instruments. In: Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition. Offshore Mediterranean Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lovell, D., Marek, P.: Hydrate inhibition in gas wells treated with two low dosage hydrate inhibitors. In: SPE Gas Technology Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Odutola, T.O., Onyekonwu, M.O., Ikiensikimama, S.S.: Effect of N-Vinylcaprolactam on hydrate inhibition in gas dominated system. In: SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guan, H.: The inhibition of gas hydrates and synergy of the inhibiting molecules. In: International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelland, M.A.: History of the development of low dosage hydrate inhibitors. Energy Fuels 20(3), 825–847 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Budd, D., Hurd, D., Pakulski, M., et al.: Enhanced hydrate inhibition in Alberta gas field. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menendez, C.M., Jardine, J., Mok, W.Y., et al.: New sour gas corrosion inhibitor compatible with kinetic hydrate inhibitor. In: IPTC 2014: International Petroleum Technology Conference vol. 2014, no. 1, pp. 1–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Md Zain, Z., Yang, J., Tohidi, B., et al.: Hydrate monitoring and warning system: a new approach for reducing gas hydrate risks. In: SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, L.W., Anderson, J.: Development of effective combined kinetic hydrate inhibitor/corrosion inhibitor (KHI/CI) products. Paper, vol. 4020, pp. 13–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carpenter, C.: Locally sourced, ecofriendly hydrate inhibitor effective in simulated offshore environment. J. Petrol. Technol. 71(09), 96–97 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zang, X.Y., Liang, D., Fan, S.S.: Effect of 3A molecular sieve on THF hydrate decomposition. J. Refrig. 28(6), 29–34 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu, J.: Synthesis, performance and application of Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors. South China University of Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Q. et al. (2021). Research and Field Test on Intelligent Injection of Mixed Natural Gas Hydrate Inhibitors. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2020. IFEDC 2020. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_151

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_151

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0762-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0761-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation