Abstract
One of the key facets of educational globalisation has been the increasing diffusion of learning programmes based on ‘Western’ principles, whether this is in the context of school curriculum frameworks, educational policy, or standalone ‘international education programmes’ (Casinader, Culture, transnational education and thinking: Case studies in global schooling, 2014). This has included the adoption of Euro-American concepts of literacy, ostensibly preparing people to participate in and receive the benefits of the globalised economy.
Within this transition, the regard for existing local systems of education has been limited; principles of ‘Western’ education have been promoted as inevitably intellectually superior and dominant. Whilst the promotion of global literacy through organisations such as the United Nations recognises the multiplicities of literacy (Parr and Campbell, International Review of Education, 58(4), 557–574, 2012) that exist, this process has also seen the constriction of notions of literacy (Bartlett, International Journal of Educational Development, 28(6), 737–753, 2008) into a Euro-American framework. This chapter seeks to critique the ways in which ‘Western’ notions of capitalism and rationalism have influenced the direction and intentions of global literacy initiatives, arguing that, instead of liberating people from socio-economic captivity, they contribute to a loss of the cultural identity embedded in local forms of knowledge and literacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Appadurai, A. (2006). Fear of small numbers: Am an essay on the geography of anger. Durham: Duke University Press.
Arshad-Ayaz, A. (2008). From producing citizens to producing managers: Education in a globalized world. In R. K. Hopson, C. Camp Yeakey, & F. Musa Boakari (Eds.), Power, voice and the public good: Schooling and education in global societies (Advances in education in diverse communities) (Vol. 6, pp. 479–506). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-358X(08)06018-X
Asian Development Bank. (2014). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014 (45th ed.). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Bartlett, L. (2008). Literacy’s verb: Exploring what literacy is and what literacy does. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(6), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.09.002.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). The essence of neoliberalism, Le Monde Diplomatique (Jeremy J. Shapiro, Trans.). https://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu
Brabeck, M. M., & Rogers, L. (2000). Human rights as a moral issue: Lessons for moral educators from human rights work. Journal of Moral Education, 29(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679341
Casinader, N. (2013). Cultural dispositions of thinking: Some implications for teaching and learning. Paper presented at the XVI ICPIC conference: Critical thinking, enquiry-based learning and philosophical enquiry in education, Cape Town, South Africa.
Casinader, N. (2014). Culture, transnational education and thinking: Case studies in global schooling. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
Collini, S. (2011). From Robbins to McKinsey. London Review of Books, 33(16), 9–14.
Dahl, M. (2010). Failure to thrive in constructivism: A cross-cultural malady. Rotterdam: Sense.
Dei, G. J. S., & Shahjahan, R. (2008). Equity and democratic education in Ghana: Towards a pedagogy of difference. In J. Zajda, L. Davies, & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Comparative and global pedagogies: Equity, access and democracy in education (pp. 49–69). Dordrecht: Springer.
Department of Basic Education South Africa. (1997). Language and education policy. Pretoria: Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/DocumentsLibrary/Policies/tabid/390/Default.aspx.
Freire, P. (1985). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. South Hadley: Westview Press.
Freire, P., Araújo, F. A. M., Macedo, D. P., Freire, A. M. A., & Macedo, D. (1998). The Paulo Freire reader. Continuum.
Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway world. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: OUP.
Korten, D. (2001). When corporations rule the world. Bloomfield, CT: Berrett-Koehler Publishers/Kumarian Press.
Kumar, P. (2013). Bridging east and west educational divides in Singapore. Comparative Education, 49(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.740221.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Digital Kompetanse, 1(1), 12–24.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, A. (2003a). Making literacy policy and practice with a difference. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 58–82.
Luke, A. (2003b). Literacy and the other: A sociological approach to literacy research and policy in multilingual societies. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 132–141.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia education blueprint 2013–25: Preliminary report. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Educafion.
Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently…And why. New York: The Free Press.
Papastergiadis, N. (2000). The turbulence of migration: Globalization, deterritorialization and hybridity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Papen, U. (2005). Literacy and development: What works for whom? Or, how relevant is the social practices view of literacy for literacy education in develo** countries? International Journal of Educational Development, 25(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.05.001.
Parr, M., & Campbell, T. A. (2012). Understanding literacy as our WORLD inheritance: Re-visioning literacy discourse and its implications for teaching practice. International Review of Education, 58(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-012-9297-1.
Rassool, N. (1999). Literacy for sustainable development in the age of information (Ser. The language and education library, 14). Multilingual Matters.
Republic of Korea, Ministry of Education. (2013). Education system: Overview. Retrieved August 2, 2012, 2013, from http://english.moe.go.kr/web/1692/site/contents/en/en_0203.jsp
Round, J. I. (2010). Globalization, growth, inequality, and poverty in Africa: A macroeconomic perspective. In M. Nissanke & E. Thorbecke (Eds.), The Poor under globalization in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584758.001.0001.
Ruggerio, R. (2000). Reflections from Seattle. In J. J. Schott (Ed.), The WTO after Seattle (pp. xiii–xvii). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Singh, M. (2013). Educational practice in India and its foundations in Indian heritage: A synthesis of the east and west? Comparative Education, 49(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.740222.
Street, B. V. (Ed.). (2001). Literacy and development: Ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge.
Stromquist, N. P. (2002). Education in a globalized world: The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.
Swiniarksi, L. B., & Breitborde, M.-L. (2003). Educating the global village: Including the young children in the world (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Tarc, P. (2012). The uses of globalization in the (shifting) landscape of educational studies. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 35(3), 4–29.
The Asian Infrastructure Development Bank. (2015). About us. Retrieved July 6, 2015, From http://www.aiibank.org/html/aboutus/AIIB/
UNESCO. (2006). Education for all: Literacy for life education for all monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2013). Adult and youth literacy: National, regional and global trends, 1985–2015 UIS Information Paper. Montreal: UNESCO.
Wickens, C. M., & Sanlin, J. A. (2007). Literacy for what? Literacy for whom? The politics of literacy, education and neocolonialism in UNESCO and World Bank-sponsored literacy programs. Adult Educational Quarterly, 57(4), 275–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casinader, N., Sheik, A. (2021). Educational Neoliberalism and the Annexation of Literacy: A Cautionary Tale in the Asia-Pacific Context. In: Bao, D., Pham, T. (eds) Transforming Pedagogies Through Engagement with Learners, Teachers and Communities. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 57. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0057-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0057-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0056-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0057-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)