Do Smart Cities Make Us Smarter ?—Philosophical Discussion on Over-Dependence on Smart-Phones in Our Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2019)

Abstract

In the recent decades, the term “smart city” has become more and more popular among researchers across a number of disciplines such as town planning, environmental studies, transport engineering and computer science. Most of the attention has been given to the application of technology into making our city more adaptable, sustainable and comfortable. However, we would like to raise a small question here amidst this wave of enthusiasm: Is smart city making us smarter, healthier and more active in other non-technological social aspects? Research attention given to topics with a pretext of “smart” has been growing in the last decade within higher education institutions as well as the society as a whole. Researching on any aspect with a pretext of “smart” is appealing these days because it is easy to get funding due to relatively clearly-defined deliverables of research outcomes in terms of technological advancement to be achieved from the study. On the other hand, how ordinary people should adapt to these fast moving “smart city” development so as to make our society more livable and amiable is a relatively less appealing topic as the deliverables are more difficult to define and measure. Hence, this aspect is usually relegated to a lower priority in most research agendas. In this paper, our objective is not to refute the importance of smart city concept. This paper is not an empirical analysis on the drawback of some smart city applications. We fully understand and appreciate the importance of smart city technologies to the various needs of urban development in any city. We wish, however, to raise the concern that smart city is developed to make human beings a more livable environment, but at the end, it is also human behaviour that determines how “livable” a society can be. In this paper, we will focus on the issues pertaining to the growing popularity of smart-phones which have become an indispensable part of our life in the development of smart cities. In this presentation, we would like to point out that while development of technological advancement for the sake of building smart cities is important and inevitable, more attention should also be given to the social responsibility of the general citizens in using these smart phones for the purpose of enjoying smart city outcomes. If smart cites are to be designed to make us smarter, we should be able to behave and live in a smarter way than before. By focusing on the use of smart phones in our cities, we would like to show that in reality, due to over-indulgence in these smart cities applications, the outcome could be the opposite, until we have learned to live in the smart way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mustafa, & Kar. (2017). Evaluating multi-dimensional risk for digital services in smart cities. I3E 2017, LNCS, 10595, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Commission, E. (2015). Cell phone use while driving. Directorate General for Transport: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, D., Pérez-Bustamante, D., & Medrano, M. (2017). Challenges for smart cities in the UK. In M. Peris Ortiz, B. Dag, R. D. Pérez-Bustamante Yábar (Eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities (pp. 1–14). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahvenniemi, H., Pinto-Seppä, & Airaksinen. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lacinák, M., & Ristvej, J. (2017). Smart city, safety and security. Procedia Engineering, 192(2017), 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva, K., & Han. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697–713.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Romero, C. D., Barriga, J. K., & Molano, J. I. (2016). Big data meaning in the architecture of IoT for smart cities. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9714, pp. 457–465). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vaquero-García, A., Álvarez-García, J., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2017). Urban models of sustainable development from the economic perspective: Smart cities. In M. Peris Ortiz; B. Dag R & D. Pérez-Bustamante Yábar (Eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities (pp. 15–30). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guan, X., Fan, G., Chen, Z., Zeng, Y., Zhang, H., Hu, A., et al. (2016). Gender difference in mobile phone use and the impact of digital device exposure on neck posture. Ergonomics, 59(11), 1453–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, P., & Chasens. (2016). Adolescent sleep and the impact of technology use before sleep on daytime function. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(5), 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saling, & Haire. (2016). Are you awake? Mobile phone use after lights out. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 932–937.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konok, P., & Miklósi. (2017). Mobile attachment: Separation from the mobile phone induces physiological and behavioural stress and attentional bias to separation-related stimuli. Computers in Human Behavior, 71(C), 228–239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seo, D. G., Park, Y., Kim, M. K., & Park, J. . (2016). Mobile phone dependency and its impacts on adolescents’ social and academic behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 63.C, 282–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, T., Li, J., Zhang, H., Gao, J., Kong, Y., Hu, Y., & Mei, S. (2018). The influence of alexithymia on mobile phone addiction: The role of depression, anxiety and stress. Journal of Affective Disorders, 225(C), 761–766.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, L., Feng, M., Kumfer, S., & Wang. (2018). Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians’ crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 115, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshiki, S., Tatsumi, H., Tsutsumi, K., Miyazaki, T., & Kujiki, T. (2017). (2017) Effects of smartphone use on behavior while walking. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 4, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Byington, K., & Schwebel, D. (2013). Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 51, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwebel, D., Stavrinos, D., Byington, K., Davis, T., O’Neal, E., & Jong, D. (2012). Distraction and pedestrian safety: How talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 266–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neider, K., McCarley, J., Crowell, J., Kaczmarski, H., & Kramer, A. (2010). Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 589–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasar, J. & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57(C), 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lichenstein, R., Smith, D. C., Ambrose, J. L., et al. (2012). Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004e2011. Journal of Injury Prevention, 18(5), 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Hin Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, L.H., Wang, L. (2021). Do Smart Cities Make Us Smarter ?—Philosophical Discussion on Over-Dependence on Smart-Phones in Our Cities. In: Ye, G., Yuan, H., Zuo, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2019. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation