Influence of Risk Favor on the Market Clearing of a Competitive Electricity Market

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of PURPLE MOUNTAIN FORUM 2019-International Forum on Smart Grid Protection and Control (PMF 2019, PMF 2021)

Abstract

For a pool-based electricity power market, the bidding strategy of individual generators is a key factor that influence the market clearing price. In this paper, the profit function and risk indexes for individual generators are derived. The bidding strategies of generators are selected based on different preference of profit and risks. Three typical strategy, aggressive, normal and conservative, are chosen as the bidding strategy for analysis. Simulations results on different scenarios show obvious effects of bidding strategies on the market clearing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arroyo JM, Conejo AJ (2002) Optimal response of a power generator to energy, AGC, and reserve pool-based markets. Power Eng Rev 22(4):76–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dai T, Qiao W (2016) Finding equilibria in the pool-based electricity market with strategic wind power producers and network constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wen F, David AK (2002) Coordination of bidding strategies in energy and spinning reserve markets for competitive suppliers using a genetic algorithm. In: 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No. 00CH37134), vol 4. IEEE, Seattle, WA, pp 2174–2179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang CH, Zhang L (2017) Calculation of nodal price based on modified DC-OPF and its application in loss allocation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Region 10 Reference. Penang, pp 1942–1946

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng H, Yang ZL, Zheng YX et al (2018) Intelligent agent based bidding simulation method for multi-input decision factors of power supplier. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(23):72–80

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandezblanco R, Arroyo JM, Alguacil N (2017) On the solution of revenue- and network-constrained day-ahead market clearing under marginal pricing—part I: an exact bilevel programming approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst (99):1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hao R, Ai Q, Jiang ZQ (2018) Bi-level game strategy for multi-agent with incomplete information in regional integrated energy system. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(04):194–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vrettos E, Oldewurtel F, Andersson G (2015) Robust energy-constrained frequency reserves from aggregations of commercial buildings. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(6):4272–4285

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li SD, Shi QS, Zhao WH et al (2016) A multi-objective optimization based bidding model with vehicle-to-grid reserve provision considered. Autom Electr Power Syst 40(02):77–83

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Q, Ji Y, Huang Q et al (2018) Bi-level optimized dispatch strategy of electric supply-demand balance considering risk-benefit coordination. IET Smart Grid 1(4):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu G, Starke M, **ao B et al (2017) Robust optimization based microgrid scheduling with islanding constraints. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(7):1820–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geng YL, Ming Z, Juan Y et al (2004) Research on procurement strategy of reactive power as auxiliary service in power markets. In: IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, vol 1. IEEE, Hong Kong, China, pp 349–354 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu YY, Chen TE, Wang JX, Li Y et al (2017) Bidding method for wind generation company in nodal power market. In: The 6th International Conference on Renewable Power Generation, pp 19–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation [No. 036000KK52170010 (GDKJXM20173410)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Feng, S., Zhang, X., Bai, Y., Cheng, L., Bao, YQ., Wu, M. (2020). Influence of Risk Favor on the Market Clearing of a Competitive Electricity Market. In: Xue, Y., Zheng, Y., Rahman, S. (eds) Proceedings of PURPLE MOUNTAIN FORUM 2019-International Forum on Smart Grid Protection and Control. PMF PMF 2019 2021. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 584. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9779-0_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9779-0_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9778-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9779-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation