Footstep Planning for Bipedal Robots and Lower Limb Exoskeletons Moving Through Narrow Doors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Electromechanics and Robotics “Zavalishin's Readings”

Abstract

This paper discusses the footstep planning problem for bipedal robots and lower limb exoskeletons. Specifically, we consider the case when the robot needs to move through a door, too narrow to pass through without turning the robot body. The proposed approach is based on numerical optimization. The fact that the planner algorithm needs to take into account not only the linear displacements of the robot’s feet, but also their orientations, makes the problem more challenging, since the resulting optimization problem becomes non-convex. The paper gives a detailed description of the proposed algorithms and provides simulation results that show the validity of these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mikołajewska, E., Mikołajewski, D.: Exoskeletons in neurological diseases-current and potential future applications. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 20(2), 227–233 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhand, S., Singla, A., Virk, G.: A brief review on human-powered lower-limb exoskeletons. In: Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (COMET-2016), IIT (BHU), pp. 116–122 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, G., Chan, C., Guo, Z., Yu, H.: A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4(4–5) (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zoss, A., Kazerooni, H., Chu, A.: Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 11(2), 128–138 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbareschi, G. et al.: Statically versus dynamically balanced gait: analysis of a robotic exoskeleton compared with a human. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 6728–6731. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Yatsun, A.: Parameter optimization for exoskeleton control system using Sobol sequences. In: Symposium on Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, pp. 361–368. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Lushnikov, B., Yatsun, A.: Algorithm for motion control of an exoskeleton during verticalization. ITM Web Conf. 6, 1–6 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Sullivan, L., et al.: End user needs elicitation for a full-body exoskeleton to assist the elderly. Proc. Manuf. 3, 1403–1409 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deits, R., Tedrake, R.: Footstep planning on uneven terrain with mixed-integer convex optimization. In: 2014 14th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 279–286. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuindersma, S., et al.: Optimization-based locomotion planning, estimation, and control design for the atlas humanoid robot. Auton. Rob. 40(3), 429–455 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chestnutt, J.: Footstep planning for the honda asimo humanoid. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 629–634. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Yatsun, A.: Footstep planner algorithm for a lower limb exoskeleton climbing stairs. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Robotics, pp. 75–82 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Yatsun, A.: Walking pattern generation method for an exoskeleton moving on uneven terrain. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and Support Technologies for Mobile Machines (CLAWAR 2017), pp. 13–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Yatsun, A.: Comparative analysis of iterative LQR and adaptive PD controllers for a lower limb exoskeleton. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), pp. 239–244. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jatsun, S., Savin, S., Yatsun, A., Postolnyi, A.: Approach to motion control of an exoskeleton in “verticalization-to-walking” regime utilizing pressure sensors. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), pp. 452–456. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deits, R., Tedrake, R.: Computing large convex regions of obstacle-free space through semidefinite programming. Algorithmic Found. Robot. XI, 109–124 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Savin, S.: An algorithm for generating convex obstacle-free regions based on stereographic projection. In: 2017 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aceituno-Cabezas, B., Cappelletto, J., Grieco, J., Fernandez-Lopez, G.: A generalized mixed-integer convex program for multilegged footstep planning on uneven terrain. ar**v preprint ar**v:1612.02109 (2016)

  20. Savin, S., Vorochaeva, L.: Footstep planning for a six-legged in-pipe robot moving in spatially curved pipes. In: 2017 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Savin, S., Jatsun, S., Vorochaeva, L.: Trajectory generation for a walking in-pipe robot moving through spatially curved pipes. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 113, p. 02016 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neunert, M. et al.: Whole-body nonlinear model predictive control through contacts for quadrupeds. ar**v preprint ar**v:1712.02889 (2017)

  23. Budhiraja, R., Carpentier, J., Mastalli, C., Mansard, N.: Differential dynamic programming for multi-phase rigid contact dynamics. In: 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-38-00140\18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergei Savin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Savin, S., Yatsun, A., Loktionova, O. (2020). Footstep Planning for Bipedal Robots and Lower Limb Exoskeletons Moving Through Narrow Doors. In: Ronzhin, A., Shishlakov, V. (eds) Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Electromechanics and Robotics “Zavalishin's Readings”. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9267-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation