Australia’s Cognition of the “India-Pacific Strategy”, Reasons and Countermeasures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Annual Report on the Development of the Indian Ocean Region (2018)

Abstract

Australia is a traditional ally of the US, and a key participator of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”, so, it is of practical significance to study Australia’s cognition of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”, and the reasons behind such cognition. This paper first reviews the process of emerging of the “Indo-Pacific” concept, and the putting forward and evolution of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”. On this basis, this paper conducts a systematic analysis about Australia’s cognition of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”, and mainly analyzes Australia’s official attitude and its academic community’s attitude toward this strategy. The analysis finds that Australian authority held a positive attitude toward the US-dominated “Indo-Pacific Strategy”; while, there are mainly three types of attitudes toward the strategy, namely, approval, middle and opposition, in the academic community; and in the academic community, to some extent, those who hold an approving attitude toward the strategy are the most influential. Then, this paper analyzes the factors that influence Australia’s cognition of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”. The factors can be classified into domestic factors and international factors. Domestic factors include Australia’s special geographic location of bordering two oceans, and the fact that Australia’s internal politics is getting increasingly conservative and populist; and external factors mainly include: regarding China, Australia follows the principle of “high level politics” overweighing “low level politics”; Australia relies on the US in security, and follows the US in strategy; and Australia gives high attention to India’s rising. Lastly, regarding China’s counter-measures, this paper attempts to put forward 3 suggestions: first, economy still can be considered an effective tool in China’s foreign policy regarding Australia; second, a tacit acceptance of the “Indo-Pacific” concept promotes the normalization of China’s presence in the Indian Ocean Region; third, China should maintain strategic composure and strategic flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Swaine (2018).

  2. 2.

    Khurana (2017).

  3. 3.

    Guo (2018).

  4. 4.

    “Confluence of the Two Seas”, Speech by H.E. Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan at the Parliament of the Republic of India, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, August 22, 2007. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html.

  5. 5.

    Medcalf (2012, p. 471).

  6. 6.

    Defense White Paper 2013, Australia Government, Department of Defense, May, 2013. p. 7. http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/2013/docs/WP_2013_web.pdf.

  7. 7.

    Medcalf (2014, p. 472).

  8. 8.

    Defending Australia-In the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030 (Defense White Paper 2009). Department of Defense, Australia Government. 2009, p. 37. http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/2009/docs/defence_white_paper_2009.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Hawke and Smith (2013).

  10. 10.

    Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Australia Government, January 23, 2013. p. 30. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/167267/Australia%20A%20Strategy%20for%20National%20Securit.pdf.

  11. 11.

    Cooper (2018, p. 7).

  12. 12.

    Chang (2017).

  13. 13.

    Cooper (2018, p. 7).

  14. 14.

    Australia, U.S., India and Japan in talks to establish Belt and Road alternative: report, Reuters, February 18, 2018.

  15. 15.

    Andrew Phillips, Australia and the Challenges of Regional Order-Building in the Indio-Pacific Age, A submission prepared to contribute to the Senate Inquiry into the Indian Ocean region and. Australia's foreign, trade and defense policy, 2012. p. 3.

  16. 16.

    Routine press meeting given by the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China Geng Shuang on November 13, 2017, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the P.R.C, November 13, 2017. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/fyrbt_673021/jzhsl_673025/t1510045.shtml.

  17. 17.

    Wyeth (2017).

  18. 18.

    Panda (2017).

  19. 19.

    Kurlantzick (2018).

  20. 20.

    Madan (2017).

  21. 21.

    See Footnote 20.

  22. 22.

    Hawke and Smith (2012).

  23. 23.

    Australia in the Asian Century White Paper, Australia Government, October, 2012. p. 74.

  24. 24.

    Defense White Paper 2013, Department of Defense, Australia Government, 2013. p. 7.

  25. 25.

    Defense White Paper 2013, Department of Defense, Australia Government, 2013. p. 8.

  26. 26.

    Defense White Paper 2013, Department of Defense, Australia Government, 2013. pp. 25–26.

  27. 27.

    Dobell (2015).

  28. 28.

    Defense White Paper 2016, Department of Defense, Australia Government, 2016, p. 70.

  29. 29.

    Australia-India-Japan-United States consultations on the Indo-Pacific, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia Government, November 12, 2017. http://dfat.gov.au/news/media/Pages/aus-india-japan-us-consultations-on-the-indo-pacific.aspx.

  30. 30.

    See Footnote 12.

  31. 31.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 3.

  32. 32.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 37.

  33. 33.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 39.

  34. 34.

    Wesley (2011).

  35. 35.

    Scott (2013).

  36. 36.

    The Quad-Plus, Heritage Organization, https://www.heritage.org/the-quad-plus.

  37. 37.

    Indo-Pacific Strategic Digest, Australia Defence College. http://www.defence.gov.au/adc/publications/Indo-Pacific_Strategic_Digest.asp.

  38. 38.

    Debating the Quad, the Center of Gravity Series, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australia National University, March 2018. pp. 2–7.

  39. 39.

    Debating the Quad, the Center of Gravity Series, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australia National University, March 2018. pp. 12–14.

  40. 40.

    Debating the Quad, the Center of Gravity Series, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australia National University, March 2018. p. 25.

  41. 41.

    Dobell (2018).

  42. 42.

    Bergin (2018).

  43. 43.

    Geoffrey Miller AO FAIIA, Singapore, Australia, “the Quad” and ASEAN: Same Same But Different, Australia institute of International Affairs, January 16, 2018. http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/singapore-australia-quad-asean-different/.

  44. 44.

    Curran (2017).

  45. 45.

    Huge White, The White Paper’s grand strategic fix: Can Australia achieve an Indo-Pacific pivot? Nov. 28, 2017. https://johnmenadue.com/hugh-white-the-white-papers-grand-strategic-fix-can-australia-achieve-an-indo-pacific-pivot/.

  46. 46.

    Debating the Quad, the Center of Gravity Series, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australia National University, March 2018. p. 8–11.

  47. 47.

    Debating the Quad, the Center of Gravity Series, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australia National University, March 2018. p. 22.

  48. 48.

    Medcalf (2014).

  49. 49.

    Fleet Base West, Australia Navy, http://www.navy.gov.au/establishments/fleet-base-west.

  50. 50.

    Marks (2017).

  51. 51.

    Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security, Australia Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. p. iii.

  52. 52.

    Defence White Paper 2013, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2013. p. 11.

  53. 53.

    Defence White Paper 2016, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2016. p. 44.

  54. 54.

    Defence White Paper 2016, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2016. p. 42.

  55. 55.

    Bishop (2017).

  56. 56.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 46.

  57. 57.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 47.

  58. 58.

    Press Conference With Senator The Hon. George Brandis QC, Attorney-General and senator The Hon. Mathias Cormann, Minister For Finance, Prime Minister of Australia, December 5, 2017. https://www.pm.gov.au/media/press-conference-senator-hon-george-brandis-qc-attorney-general-and-senator-hon-mathias.

  59. 59.

    Tom Phillips (2017).

  60. 60.

    Bisley (2018).

  61. 61.

    2017 Lowy Institute Poll, Lowy Institute, June 21, 2017. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/2017-lowy-institute-poll.

  62. 62.

    Valencia (2017).

  63. 63.

    Defence White Paper 2013, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2013. p. 10.

  64. 64.

    Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security, Australia Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. January 23, 2013. p. vii.

  65. 65.

    Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security, Australia Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. January 23, 2013. p. 38.

  66. 66.

    Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security, Australia Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. January 23, 2013. p. 22.

  67. 67.

    Australia-US Defence Trade Cooperation Treaty, Department of Defence, Australia Government.

  68. 68.

    Defence White Paper 2016, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2016. p. 15.

  69. 69.

    Defence White Paper 2016, Department of Defence, Australia Government, 2016. p. 123.

  70. 70.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 4.

  71. 71.

    U.S. Relations With Australia, U.S Department of State, February 24, 2017. https://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2698.htm.

  72. 72.

    Fact Sheet: United States–Australia Cooperation: Deepening Our Strategic Partnership, the White House, January 19, 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/19/fact-sheet-united-states-%E2%80%93-australia-cooperation-deepening-our-strategic.

  73. 73.

    Exercise Talisman Sabre 2017, Department of Defence, Australia Government, http://www.defence.gov.au/Exercises/TS17/.

  74. 74.

    Probyn (2018).

  75. 75.

    India-Australia Joint Declaration on Security Cooperation During Visit of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis. November 12, 2009. https://idsa.in/resources/documents/India-AustraliaJointDeclaration.12.11.09.

  76. 76.

    Khurana (2015).

  77. 77.

    Brewster (2014).

  78. 78.

    Brewster (2016).

  79. 79.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 42.

  80. 80.

    Wong (2018).

  81. 81.

    See Footnote 80.

  82. 82.

    Composition of Trade-Australia 2017, Australia Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, p. 74. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/cot-2016-17.pdf.

  83. 83.

    Composition of Trade-Australia 2017, Australia Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, p. 47. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/cot-2016-17.pdf.

  84. 84.

    Composition of Trade-Australia 2017, Australia Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, p. 9. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/cot-2016-17.pdf.

  85. 85.

    2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, Australia Government, 2017. p. 26.

  86. 86.

    See Footnote 1.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiegen, Z., Hongmei, L. (2019). Australia’s Cognition of the “India-Pacific Strategy”, Reasons and Countermeasures. In: Zhu, C. (eds) Annual Report on the Development of the Indian Ocean Region (2018). Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7693-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation