ONE-POINT ADVICE: The Limitations and Potential of MICS During Aortic Valvuloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aortic Valve Preservation
  • 566 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, when we consider the favorable long-term outcomes of biological valves, we automatically focus on young patients when discussing the main indications for aortic valvuloplasty (AVP). Many young patients, and particularly women, find the concept of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) desirable from a cosmetic perspective. When compared to midline incisions, MICS does not reduce the rates of mortality or major complications, so the main reasons for performing MICS are for cosmetic reasons and the need for early return to daily activities. As a rule, it is therefore desirable to determine the indications carefully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 155.99
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, Schönbrodt M, Renner A, Meibodi KH, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:596–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1222–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ito T, Maekawa A, Hoshino S, Hayashi Y. Right infraaxillary thoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:715–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Boodhwani M, Rubay J, Dhoore W, et al. Repair of aortic leaflet prolapse: a ten-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:785–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dave HH, Comber M, Solinger T, Bettex D, Dodge-Khatami A, Prêtre R. Mid-term results of right axillary incision for the repair of a wide range of congenital cardiac defects. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:864–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Ito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ito, T. (2019). ONE-POINT ADVICE: The Limitations and Potential of MICS During Aortic Valvuloplasty. In: Kunihara, T., Takanashi, S. (eds) Aortic Valve Preservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2068-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2068-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2067-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2068-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation