Habermas (1): A Neoliberal Post-secular Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The i-zation of Society, Religion, and Neoliberal Post-Secularism
  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces Jurgen Habermas’s project of post-secularism (i.e. the management of communication between religious and atheist groups in the public sphere) and uses Shari’a as a case study to argue that in ‘i-society’ (see Chap. 8) post-secularism can be thought of as a social model wherein religion becomes more and more standardized to fit with a neoliberal ideology. In this situation, religion is not so much an agent of communicative action in what Habermas refers to as the lifeworld ; it has instead, paradoxically, been instrumentalized (or ‘colonized’, to use Habermas’s term) by neoliberal rationalization. Post-secularism will be successful, but not in the way it was intended by Habermas. It will be colonized, McDonaldized, and, as this chapter argues, i-zed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 58.84
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbalet, J. (2011). Chinese Religion, Market Society and the State. In J. Barbalet, A. Possamai, & B. Turner (Eds.), Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology. New York: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J., Possamai, A., & Turner, B. (Eds.). (2011). Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology. New York: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. (2010). Confronting Modernity: Maruyama Masao, Jürgen Habermas, and Charles Taylor. In M. Warner, J. Van Antwerpen, & C. Calhoun (Eds.), Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age (pp. 32–52). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A., & Sadiq, K. (2011). Good and Bad Sharia: Australia’s Mixed Response to Islamic Law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 17(1), 383–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubekeur, A., & Roy, O. (2012). Introduction. Whatever Happened to the Islamists or … Political Islam Itself? In A. Boubekeur & O. Roy (Eds.), Whatever Happened to the Islamists? Salafis, Heavy Metal Muslims and the Lure of Consumerist Islam (pp. 1–13). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2011a). Afterword: Religion’s Many Powers. In E. Mendieta & J. Vanantwerpen (Eds.), The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (pp. 118–134). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2011b). Secularism, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere. In C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, & J. Vanantwerpen (Eds.), Rethinking Secularism (pp. 75–91). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2010). 2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential Address. Can Post-secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences? Sociology of Religion, 71(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, M. (2008). Brands of Faith: Marketing Religion in a Commercial Age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. (2010). Contemporary Globalization and New Civilizational Formations. Journal of Globalization Studies, 1(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordan, G., & Pace, E. (Eds.). (2012). Map** Religion and Spirituality in the Post-secular World. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (2000). Snapshots of Islamic Modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Ratzinger, J. (2006). The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco: Ignatius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, J. (2011). Islam: Its Law and Society (3rd ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, J., & Possamai, A. (2013). A Down Under Approach and Reaction to Shari’a: An Impasse Towards Post-secularism? In M. Berger (Ed.), Applying Sharia in the West: Facts, Fears and Figures of Islamic Rules on Family Relations in the West (pp. 65–78). Leiden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2012). Infidel Brands: Unveiling Alternative Meanings of Global Brands at the Nexus of Globalization, Consumer Culture, and Islamism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 663–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2010). The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism? New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies. International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2013). Neoliberal Multiculturalism. In P. Hall & M. Lamont (Eds.), Social Resilience in the Neo-liberal Era. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli, L., & Wilson, E. (2016). Post Secularism and International Relations. In J. Haynes (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendieta, E., & Vanantwerpen, J. (2011). Introduction. The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. In E. Mendieta & J. Vanantwerpen (Eds.), The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (pp. 1–14). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muslim Council of Britain. (2013). The Muslim Pound: Celebrating the Muslim Contribution to the UK Economy. The Muslim Council of Britain at the 9th World Islamic Economic Forum 2013. London: Muslim Council of Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, K. M. (2016). Globalized Muslim Youth in the Asia Pacific. Popular Culture in Singapore and Sydney. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obadia, L. (2013). La marchandisation de Dieu. L’économie religieuse. Paris: CNRS éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possamai, A. (2015). Popular and Lived Religions. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115587022.

  • Possamai, A., Turner, B., Roose, J., Dagistanli, S., & Voyce, M. (2013). Defining the Conversation About Shari’a: Representations in Australian Newspapers. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 626–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose, J., & Possamai, A. (2014). Between Rhetoric and Reality: Shari’a and the Shift Towards Neo-liberal Multiculturalism in Australia. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Cultural, Religious and Political Contestations. The Multicultural Challenge (pp. 91–105). Leiden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, N. (2011). Localized Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism and Global Religion: Exploring the Agency of Migrants and City Boosters. Economy and Society, 40(2), 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, F. (2016). Brand Islam. The Marketing and Commodification of Piety. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane-White, P. (2012). Beyond Islamism at Work: Corporate Islam in Malaysia. In A. Boubekeur & O. Roy (Eds.), Whatever Happened to the Islamists? Salafis, Heavy Metal Muslims and the Lure of Consumerist Islam (pp. 223–245). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, J. (2010). A (Post-)Secular Age? Religion and the Two Exceptionalisms. Social Research, 77(1), 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, R. (2007). Religion in Public Life. Must Faith Be Privatized? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (2012). Managing Religions, Citizenship and the Liberal Paradox. Citizenship Studies, 16(8), 1059–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (2015). Three Theories of Justice: Preliminary Reflections. In S. Simon & B. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’ (pp. 29–47). New York: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (2016). Ritual, Belief and Habituation: Religion and Religions from the Axial Age to the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016645355.

  • Wallace, A. (2003). Reason, Society and Religion: Reflections on 11 September from a Habermasian Perspective. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 29(5), 491–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Possamai, A. (2018). Habermas (1): A Neoliberal Post-secular Project. In: The i-zation of Society, Religion, and Neoliberal Post-Secularism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5942-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5942-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5941-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5942-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation