Abstract
Promoters in Escherichia coli include an ‘OFF’ state, during which transcription is halted. Here, we propose a novel empirical method for assessing the time-length spent by promoters in this state. It relies on direct measurements of RNA production kinetics at the single molecule level at different induction levels, followed by an estimation of the RNA production rate under infinite induction, which is then compared to this rate under real, maximum induction. We apply it to the LacO3O1 promoter and infer that, under full induction, on average, 15% of the time between successful transcription events is spent in the OFF state. We verify this result by comparing the kinetics of a mutant strain lacking repressor molecules with that of the inferred rate under infinite induction. We expect this strategy of dissecting the kinetics of transcription repression to be applicable to a wide number of promoters in E. coli.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. Golding I, Paulsson J, Zawilski S, Cox EC (2005) Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 123:1025–36.
2. Muthukrishnan A-B et al (2014) In vivo Transcription Kinetics of a Synthetic Gene Uninvolved in Stress-Response Pathways in Stressed Escherichia coli cells. PLoS ONE 9(9): e109005
3. Lloyd-Price J et al. (2016) Dissecting the stochastic transcription initiation process in live Escherichia coli. DNA Res. 23:203–14.
4. Baba T et al. (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol.2:1-11.
5. Glascock CB and Weickert MJ (1998) Using chromosomal lacI Q1 to control expression of genes on high-copy-number plasmids in Escherichia coli. Gene 223, 221–23.
6. NSM Goncalves et al. (2016) In vivo single-molecule dynamics of transcription of the viral T7 Phi 10 promoter in E. coli. In Proc. of the BIOTECHNO 2016, June 26-30, 2016 Lisbon, Portugal.
7. Nevo-Dinur K et al. (2011) Translation-independent localization of mRNA in E. coli. Science 331(6020):1081-4.
8. Häkkinen A and Ribeiro AS (2015) Estimation of GFP-tagged RNA numbers from temporal fluorescence intensity data. Bioinformatics 31 (1): 69-75.
9. Chong S, Chen C, Ge H, and **e XS (2014) Mechanism of Transcriptional Bursting in Bacteria. Cell 158, 314–326.
10. Liu L and Wang J (1987) Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 7024–7.
11. DeHaseth PL, Zupancic ML and Record MT (1998) RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: The comings and goings of RNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 180, 3019–25.
12. Liang S et al. (1999) Activities of constitutive promoters in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 292:19–37.
13. McClure WR (1985) Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54:171–204
14. Ehrenberg M et al. (2013) Medium-dependent control of the bacterial growth rate. Biochimie. Elsevier Masson 95:643–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Palma, C.S. et al. (2018). A strategy for dissecting the kinetics of transcription repression mechanisms. In: Eskola, H., Väisänen, O., Viik, J., Hyttinen, J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC NBC 2017 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_274
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_274
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5121-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5122-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)