Abstract
With the continuous development of urbanization, a large number of construction and demolition wastes (CDW) caused by the construction projects have become increasingly prominent, and CDW reduction is one of the effective means to improve the status quo. In recent years, CDW reduction has been one of research focuses in both industrial and academic areas. However, previous researches mainly pay attention to reduction measures while the effectiveness of these measures is seldom. In addition, most of the existing studies use static methods, lacking of consideration of the mutual influences between the various factors in the reduction system. Therefore, based on system dynamics theory, the paper developed a dynamic model to assess the effect of the key measures for CDW reduction. Firstly, on the basis of literature review, this paper identified 11 key measures mainly from the aspects of management, techniques and stakeholders’ motivation. Secondly, a model to evaluate the effectiveness of waste reduction measures was established via Vensim software. Finally, the real data of Shenzhen were used to conduct a case study and a scenario simulation analysis. The simulation results show that the model is valid and robust which can be used for quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of CDW reduction measures and serve as a valuable decision support tool to management departments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li P (2007) Utilization of construction waste, vigorously develop the circular economy. DC Pract Theor 6:84–87
Yuan HP et al (2012) A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag 32:521–531
Kulatunga U et al (2006) Attitudes and perceptions of construction workforce on construction waste in Sri Lanka. Manag Environ Qual 17(1):57–72
Yuan HP, Shen LY (2011) Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Wastes Manag 31(12):670–679
Hao JL et al (2003) Integrated construction waste reduction measures. Chongqing Environ Sci 25(11):10–12
Li J et al (2010) Construction site construction waste reduction measures Investigation. J Proj Manag 24(3):332–335
Zhu J, Li J (2011) Construction workers construction waste reduction behavior. Influencing Factors Anal Case Shenzhen City Proj Manag Technol 25(6):633–637
Jaillon L, Poon CS, Chiang YH (2009) Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 29(1):309–320
Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2004) Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Build Environ 39(7):851–861
Faniran OO, Caban G (1998) Minimizing waste on construction project sites. Eng Constr Archit Manag 5(2):182–188
Kautto P, Melanen M (2004) How does industry responds to waste policy instruments—Finnish experiences. J Clean Prod 12(1):1–11
Zhou J (2010) PRD construction waste investigation and countermeasures. South China University of Technology, Guangzhou
Tam VWY (2008) On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management-plan method in construction. Waste Manag 28(6):1072–1080
Wang Q (1994) System dynamics (Revised Edition). Tsinghua University Press, Bei**g
Wang J, Yuan H (2009) Construction waste management model based on system dynamics. Syst Eng Theor Pract 29(7):173–180
Marzouk M, Azab S (2014) Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:41–49
Zhao WH, Ren VS (2011) A system dynamics model for evaluating the alternative of type in construction and demolition waste recycling center—The case of Chongqing. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:604–612
Shenzhen Urban Statistic Bureau. http://www.sztj.gov.cn/
Shenzhen Urban Planning and Land Resources Committee http://www.sz.gov.cn/
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express our sincere gratitude to the Special Fund of the Central Finance for the Development of Local Universities (No. 000022070151) for their financial support on this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix1
Appendix1
No. | Abbreviations | Variable name | Variable type |
---|---|---|---|
1 | CDWR | CDW Reduction | Auxiliary Variable |
2 | CDWRR | CDW Reduction Rate | Auxiliary Variable |
3 | CFA | Constructed Floor Area | Auxiliary Variable |
4 | CS | Classification and Sorting | Parameter |
5 | CT | Construction Technologies | Stock |
6 | CW | Construction Waste | Auxiliary Variable |
7 | CWPFA | Construction Waste Per Floor area | Parameter |
8 | DFA | Demolished Floor Area | Auxiliary Variable |
9 | DW | Demolition Waste | Auxiliary Variable |
10 | DWPFA | Demolition Waste Per Floor Area | Parameter |
11 | EIE | Economic Incentives from Enterprise | Parameter |
12 | ETRA | Education and Training on Reduction for Architects | Parameter |
13 | ETRCW | Education and Training on Reduction for Construction Workers | Parameter |
14 | GCDW | Generated CDW | Stock |
15 | GDP | GDP | Stock |
16 | GEI | Governmental Economic Incentives | Parameter |
17 | ICDW | Increased CDW | Flow |
18 | ICS | Impact of Classification and Sorting | Auxiliary Variable |
19 | ICT | Impact of Construction Technologies | Auxiliary Variable |
20 | IEI | Impact of Economic Incentives | Auxiliary Variable |
21 | IEIE | Impact of Economic Incentives from Enterprise | Auxiliary Variable |
22 | IETR | Impact of Education and Training on Reduction | Auxiliary Variable |
23 | IETRA | Impact of Education and Training on Reduction for Architects | Auxiliary Variable |
24 | IETRCW | Impact of Education and Training on Reduction for Construction Workers | Auxiliary Variable |
25 | IGDP | Increasing GDP | Flow |
26 | IGEI | Impact of Governmental Economic Incentives | Auxiliary Variable |
27 | II | Increasing Initiative | Flow |
28 | IICDWR | Impact of Initiative on CDW Reduction | Auxiliary Variable |
29 | IIR | Initiative Increasing Rate | Auxiliary Variable |
30 | ILCF | Impact of Landfill Charging Fee | Auxiliary Variable |
31 | IMD | Impact of Modular Design | Auxiliary Variable |
32 | IP | Impact of Prefabrications | Auxiliary Variable |
33 | IRDC | Impact of Reducing Design Changes | Auxiliary Variable |
34 | IRGDP | Increasing Rate of GDP | Auxiliary Variable |
35 | IRLR | Impacts of Related Laws and Regulations | Auxiliary Variable |
36 | IRMPR | Impact of Related Management Policies on Reduction | Auxiliary Variable |
37 | IRTR | Increasing Rate of Technologies on Reduction | Auxiliary Variable |
38 | ISCDWP | Impact of Supervision of CDW Policy | Auxiliary Variable |
39 | ITR | Improvement of Technologies on Reduction | Flow |
40 | IUMT | Impact of Using Metal Template | Auxiliary Variable |
41 | LCF | Landfill Charging Fee | Parameter |
42 | MCDWM | Measures of CDW Management | Stock |
43 | MD | Modular Design | Parameter |
44 | MPM | Mandatory Policies and Measures | Flow |
45 | P | Prefabrications | Parameter |
46 | RCDW | Reduced CDW | Flow |
47 | RDC | Reducing Design Changes | Parameter |
48 | SCDWP | Supervision of CDW Policy | Parameter |
49 | SICDWR | Stakeholders’ Initiative on CDW Reduction | Stock |
50 | UMT | Using Metal Template | Parameter |
51 | W1 | Weight 1 | Parameter |
52 | W2 | Weight 2 | Parameter |
53 | WCS | Weight of Classification and Sorting | Parameter |
54 | WCT | Weight of Construction Technologies | Parameter |
55 | WICDWR | Weight of Initiative on CDW Reduction | Parameter |
56 | WLCF | Weight of Landfill Charging Fee | Parameter |
57 | WMD | Weight of Modular Design | Parameter |
58 | WP | Weight of Prefabrications | Parameter |
59 | WP1 | Weight of Policy1 | Parameter |
60 | WP2 | Weight of Policy2 | Parameter |
61 | WRDC | Weight of Reducing Design Changes | Parameter |
62 | WRMP | Weight of Related Management Policies | Parameter |
63 | WSCDWP | Weight of Supervision of CDW Policy | Parameter |
64 | WUMT | Weight of Using Metal Template | Parameter |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, T., Wang, J., Wu, D., Gao, Y. (2017). Assessment Model of the Effectiveness of Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction Measures: A Case of Shenzhen. In: Wu, Y., Zheng, S., Luo, J., Wang, W., Mo, Z., Shan, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_95
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_95
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0854-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0855-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)