Abstract
All objects are mirrors of the man who sees them. This statement is less subjectivistic than it may sound. Although mirrors are concave, convex, plane, etc., and that which they reflect is shaped and distorted by their own character; nevertheless, one who knows the theory of light and is in a position to apply this theory to special cases as they arise, need not be blinded or confused by these distortions. We do not see our impulses and wishes, our psychic sets and ideas reflected in a simple and undistorted fashion anywhere in the world around us. They are reflected back to us in diverse and broken patterns. If we would interpret these reflections and so experience both ourselves and the world aright, then we must learn the relevant theory and learn to apply it in order to correct for inevitable distortions and misrepresentations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Perception and Aesthetic Value, N. Y., 1938, p. 193.
Ibid., p. 143.
“Psychology and Literature,” in Modern Man in Search of a Soul, N. Y., 1933, ch. viii.
Cf. J. K. Feibleman, Aesthetics, N.Y., 1949, ch. 9. Also G. D. Birkhoff, Aesthetic Measure, Cambridge, 1933.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1957 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ballard, E.G. (1957). Criticism. In: Art and Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8843-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8843-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8193-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-8843-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive