Abstract
The role of models in the design of computer systems to support interpersonal and cooperative work is examined. It is argued that the current generation of models over-emphasise determinism at the expense of interpretation in the work process. It is further argued that there are many cases in which designs pass between many different professional groups (office workers, managers, analysts, designers, programmers). Each of these groups has its own worldview and specialised language, and hence they are termed “semantic communities”. When designs pass between semantic communities, something is lost and something is gained -- but the objects on which each community works are not commensurable. The distinct objects of work (office problems, analyses, designs, programs) do not map onto each other, and cannot be mutually tested using simple true/false criteria. This is termed a problem of “ontological drift”, and arises whenever several distinct semantic communities work on the “same” system. It is suggested that the disparity so often observed between design expectations and the ways systems are actually used is therefore quite normal. Current efforts are directed at eliminating the disparity. We suggest that a more fruitful approach might be to accept that the final determination of a system rests with the users. In the long run this might give rise to different types of design principles than those used at the moment. In the short run, even the consciousness of this perspective could make significant differences to design dialogues and attitudes to “users”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agre, P. & Chapman, D. (1989) What are plans for? MIT AI Memo 1050a, MIT, Oct. 1989.
Auramaki, E, Hirschheim, R. & Lyytinen, K. (draft ms.) Modelling Offices in SAMPO: A Comparison and Evaluation with OSSAD and ICN.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Bullen, C. & Bennett, J. (1990) Learning from user experience with groupware. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’90, October, Los Angeles, CA, pp 291–302.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988) A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems. Communications of the ACM, 31 (11), 1268–1287.
Ehn, P. (1988) Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
Ellis, C.A., Gibbons, R., & Morris, P. (1980) Office Streamlining. In N. Naffah (ed.) Integrated Office Systems — Burotics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Fikes, R.E. & Henderson, D.A. (1980) On supporting the use of procedures in office work. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual AAAI Conference, Stanford University, CA, August, 1980, 202–207.
Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1981) The pregnant pause: An enquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15: 229–243, Oct. 1981.
Gasser, L. (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4,3, 205–225.
Geertz, C. (1973) Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gerson, E. M. and Star, S. L. (1986) Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 3 (July 1986), pp. 257–270.
Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.
Grantham, C.E. & Carasik, R.F. (1988) The Phenomenology of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Interpersonal Software, Berkeley, CA.
Hammer, M. & Sirbu, M. (1980) What is Office Automation? In Proc. First Office Automation Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. March.
Henessey, P., Benford, S. & Bowers, J. (1989) Modelling Group Communication Structures: Analysing four European projects. In Proceedings of the First European CSCW’89 Conference, Part Two, Gatwick, UK, pp. 406–420.
Hewitt, C. (1986) Offices are open systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 3, 271–287.
Jackson, M.A. (1983) System Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Johansen, R. (1988) Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. New York and London: The Free Press.
Johnson, B., Weaver, G., Olson, M., & Dunham, R. (1988) Using a computer-based tool to support collaboration: A field experiment. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’86, Austin, Texas, pp. 343–352.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
Mackay, W. (1990) Users and Customizable Software: A Co-Adaptive Phenomenon. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
Mackay, W.E., Malone, T., Crowston, K., Rao, R., Rosenblitt, D. & Card, S. (1989) How do experienced Information Lens users use rules? ACM CHI’89 Proceedings, Austin, Texas, 211–216.
Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., Lai, K.-Y., Rao, R., and Rosenblitt, D. (1987) Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems. 5, 2 (April 1987), pp. 115–131.
Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., Turbak, K. R., Brobst, F. A., and Cohen, M. D. (1987) Intelligent information sharing systems. Communications of the ACM, 30, 390–402.
Maturana, H.R. (1988) Ontology for Observing: The Biological Foundations of Self Consciousness and The Physical Domain of Existence. In Proc. Conference on Texts in Cybernetic Theory, American Society for Cybernetics, Feiton, CA. Oct. 18–23.
McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K. & Aron, R. (1978) Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica 24, 3, 4, 245–275.
Neuwirth, CM., Kaufer, D.S., Chandhok, R. & Morris, J.H. (1990) Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’90, Los Angeles, CA pp. 183–195.
Robinson, M. (1990) Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Informatics for Development. In Proc. INFORMATICA’90. Havana. February.
Robinson, M. (1991) Double level languages and co-operative working. AI & Society, 5, 34–60.
Ross, D.T. & Schoman, K.E. (1977) Structured Analysis for Requirements Definition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol. SE3. No.1. January.
Savage, C.M. (Ed.) (1987) Fifth Generation Management for Fifth Generation Technology (A Round Table Discussion), Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan.
Schmidt, K. (1990a) Analysis of Cooperative Work: A Conceptual Framework. Risø National Lab Report M-2890.
Schmidt, K. (1990b) The Procrustes Paradigm. (Working Paper) COTECH WG4 Meeting: CEC Brussels, Nov.
Suchman, L. & Wynn, E. (1984) Procedures and problems in the office. Office: Technology and People, 2.
Suchman, L. (1983) Office procedures as practical action. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems. 1, pp. 320–328.
Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tatar, D., Foster, G. & Bobrow, D. (1991) Design for conversation: Lessons from Cognoter. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 185–209.
Victor, F. & Sommer, E. (1989) Supporting the design of office procedures in the DOMINO system. In Proceedings of the First European CSCW’89 Conference, Gatwick, UK, pp. 148–159.
Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Wittgenstein, L. (1963) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Wynn, E. (1979) Office conversation as an information medium. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Yourdon, E. (1982) Managing the System Life Cycle. New York: Yourdon Press.
Zisman, M.D. (1977) Representation, Specification, and Automation of Office Procedures. PhD dissertation, Dept of Decision Sciences, The Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, PA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, M., Bannon, L. (1991). Questioning Representations. In: Bannon, L., Robinson, M., Schmidt, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’91. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1439-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3506-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive