Abstract
The official from the State Department of Environmental Protection locked the door to the County Agricultural Extension Service building and the five of us walked together out into the parking lot. After almost three and one-half hours of heated discussions with citizens in the meeting room, the fresh, cool air of the night was reinvigorating. I was thinking to myself, I’m glad that’s over with! when the DEP official aggressively said, “Well that finishes any chance of our getting a landfill sited in this part of the state for the near future. The participation project was a complete failure. NIMBY strikes again.” Between the lines I thought I heard him say, “Thanks for nothing.”
Right thinking dependes as much on right willing as right willing on right thinking.
Max Horkheimer (1972:162)
We should not expect a generally valid answer when we ask what is good for me, or good for us, or good for them; we must rather ask: what is equally good for all?
Jürgen Habermas (1992:248)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexy, R, “Eine Theorie des praktischen Diskurses,” in: W. Oelmüller (ed.) Normen begrü Normendurchsetzung (Paderborn, 1978).
Austin, J., How to Do Things with Words (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA., 1969).
Benhabib, Seyla, Critique, Norm, and Utopia (Columbia University Press: New York, 1986).
Bernstein, Richard (ed.), Habermas and Modernity (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1985).
Bownes, Hugh, “Should Trail by Jury be Eliminated in Complex Cases?,” RISK:Issues in Health and Safety l(l):73–78 (1990).
Braaten, Jane, Haberma’s Critical Theory of Society (SUNY Press: Albany, NY, 1991).
Brulle, Robert, “Jürgen Habermas: An Exegesis for Human Ecologists,” Human Ecology Bulletin Spring/Summer 1992 (No. 8):29–40.
Dietz, Thomas, “Social Impact Assessment as a Tool for Rangelands Management,” in: National Academy of Sciences (eds.), Develo** Strategies for Rangelands Management (Westview: Boulder, CO, 1984), pp. 1613–1634.
Dietz, Thomas, “Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment,” Sociological Inquiry 57:54–69 (1987).
Dietz, Thomas, “Social Impact Assessment as Applied Human Ecology: Integrating Theory and Method,” in: Richard Borden, Gerald Young, and Jamien Jacobs (editors) Human Ecology: Research and Applications (Society for Human Ecology: College Park, MD, 1988), pp. 220–227.
Dietz, Thomas, “The Challenges of Global Environmental Change for Human Ecology,” in: Lars O. Hansson and Britta Jungen (eds.) Human Responsibility and Global Change (University of Göteborg: Göteborg, Sweden, 1992), pp. 30–45.
Dietz, Thomas, and Alicia Pfund “An Impact Identification Method for Development Program Evaluation,” Policy Studies Review 8:137–145 (1988).
Fiorino, D. J., “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms,” Science, Technology, … Human Values 15(2): 226–243 (1990).
Forester, John (ed.), Critical Theory and Public Life (MIT Press: Cambridge, 1985).
Forester, John, Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. (SUNY Press: Albany, NY, 1993).
Habermas, Jürgen, “Toward a Theory of Communicative Competence,” Inquiry 13(4):360–376 (1970).
Habermas, Jürgen, “Wahrheitstheorien,” in: H. Fahrenbach (ed), Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schutz zum 60 Gebürtstag (Pfüllingen: Neske, 1973), pp. 211–263.
Habermas, Jürgen Communication and the Evolution of Society translated by Thomas McCarthy, (Beacon Press: Boston, 1979).
Habermas, Jürgen, “A Reply to my Critics,” translated by Thomas McCarthy, in: John B. Thompson and David Held (eds.) Habermas: Critical Debates (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1982), pp. 219–283.
Habermas, Jürgen, Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society translated by Thomas McCarthy, (Beacon Press: Boston, 1984).
Habermas, Jürgen, Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: System and Lifeworld translated by Thomas McCarthy, (Beacon Press: Boston, 1987).
Habermas, Jürgen, “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article,” translated by Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox, in: Stephen Eric Bronner and Douglas MacKay Kellner (editors), Critical Theory and Society: A Reader (Routledge: London, 1989).
Habermas, Jürgen, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholson, second printing (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991).
Habermas, Jürgen, Autonomy and Solidarity Revised Edition, Edited by Peter Dews (Verso: London, 1992).
Horkheimer, Max, Critical Theory: Selected Essays (Herder and Herder: New York, 1972).
Johnson, James, “Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action,” Political Theory 19(2):181–201 (1991).
Kemp, Ray, “Planning, Political Hearings, and the Politics of Discourse,” in: John Forester (ed.), Critical Theory and Public Life (MIT Press: Cambridge, 1985).
Laird, Frank, “Participatory Analysis: Democracy and Technological Decision Making,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 18(3):341–361 (1993).
Moon, Donald, “Constrained Discourse and Public Life,” Political Theory 19(2):202–229 (1991).
Rosener, Judy, “Citizen Participation: Can We Measure Its Effectiveness?” Public Administration Review 38:457–463 (1978).
Stern, Paul C., “Learning Through Conflict: A Realistic Strategy for Risk Communication,” Policy Sciences 24:99–119 (1991).
Stern, Paul C., Oran R. Young, and Daniel Druckman (eds.), National Research Council Global Environment Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions (National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 1992
Stern, Paul C., and Thomas Dietz, “The Value Basis of Environmental Concern,” Journal of Social Issues (forthcoming).
Stallen, Peter Jan, “Risk of Science of Science of Risk?” in: Harry S. Otway (ed.) Scienctific and Cultural Approaches to Risk (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985), pp. 131–148.
White, Stephen, The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas Second Printing (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webler, T. (1995). “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive