Quantum Mechanical Tunneling in Free Radical Reactions

  • Conference paper
Fast Reactions in Energetic Systems

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((ASIC,volume 71))

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Examples of free radical reactions are described for which convincing evidence for quantum-mechanical tunneling has been reported. They include: H-atom abstraction reactions by thermalized methyl radicals and H-atoms in solids (crystalline and glass phases) at low temperatures; radical-pair conversions at 4.2 K; isomerization of hindered aryl radicals and intermolecular H-transfer reactions in fluid solution.

The physical importance and consequences of tunneling have been recognized since the early days of quantum mechanics. The concept of tunneling has become familiar in many fields and has been substantiated for electron transfer reactions, decay of radioactive nuclei (la), electron emission from metals, H-transfer reactions (1), etc.

In 1935 Bell predicted (2) that due to quantum mechanical tunneling, the rate of hydrogen transfer would become almost temperature independent at a very low temperature. Tunneling has been invoked to explain proton transfer data on innumerable occasions (1). However, in many cases the experimental work has been carried out at or even above room temperature where it is difficult to obtain conclusive experimental evidence since the thermally activated process greatly exceeds the contribution from tunneling (3).

Perhaps the most convincing example of tunneling in proton transfer reactions is the one reported by Rentzepis (4) in his study, by picosecond spectroscopy, of the visual process. Upon photolysis (530 nm) rhodopsin undergoes a H+ transfer to yield prelumirhodopsin which appears within 6 ps of excitation and decays with a time constant of ca. 50 ns. The extremely fast formation of prelumirhodopsin at 4 K argues against the cis-trans isomerization process previously thought to be the key step in the visual process. The low temperature data support a H+transfer proceeding by a tunneling mechanism through an activation barrier of ca. 0.7 Kcal/mol. Chemical reactions involving H atom abstraction by free radicals have been studied almost exclusively in the gas phase or in solution above or at room temperature (5,6).

In the solid phase at low temperatures thermally activated process should be suppressed and tunneling should become relatively important. Nevertheless, it was anticipated that H-transfer reactions characterized by activation energies in excess of 5 Kcal/mol at ordinary temperatures, would have negligibly small reaction rates in crystalline or glassy matrices at very low temperatures (7). In an outstanding series of papers, Williams and coworkers have provided convincing evidence that thermal methyl radicals can abstract hydrogen atoms from acetonitrile (8), methyl isocyanide (9), methanol (10) and 3-methylpentane (11) in the solid state at low temperature. The experimental findings could be rationalized on the basis that quantum mechanical tunneling becomes largely responsible for reaction at low temperatures. In these studies, the esr technique gave unequivocal evidence for hydrogen atom abstraction. It was also possible to establish a kinetic coincidence between the two species by monitoring the decay of reactant radicals and the formation of product radicals (12).

The presence of appreciable tunneling in an H-transfer reaction usually leads to: (i) large deuterium kinetic isotope effects, (ii) large differences in effective activation energies for H and D species and (iii) nonlinear Arrhenius plots.

In practical cases, one or more of these phenomena may be observed, depending on the temperature range studied, the accuracy of the data, and the relative importance of the tunneling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. For several recent reviews see: a. Caldin, E.F.: 1969, Chem. Rev. 69, pp. 135–156; b. Bell, R.P.: 1974, Chem. Soc. Rev. 3, pp. 513–544; c. Harmony, M.D.: 1972, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1, pp. 211–228; d. Bell, R.P.: 1973, The Proton in Chemisty, eds. Chapman and Hall, London, Chapter 12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, R.P.: 1935, Proc. Roy. Soc. 148A, pp. 241–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogne, O.: 1978, Acta. Chem. Scand. 32 Ser. A, pp. 559–563 and references cited therein.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. a. Busch, G.E., Applebury, M.L., Lamola, A.A., and Rentzepis, P.M.: 1972, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 69, pp. 2802–2806; b. Sundstrom, V., Rentzepis, P.M., Peters, K.S., and Applebury, M.L.: 1977, Nature (London) 267, pp. 645–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston, H.S.: 1960, Adv. Chem. Phys. 3, pp. 131–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LeRoy, D.J., Ridley, B.A., and Quickert, K.A.: 1967, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 44, pp. 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For a review see: Willard, J.E.: 1968, Fundamental Processes in Radiation Chemistry, ed. Ausloos, P., Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y. pp. 599–649.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sprague, E.D. and Williams, F.: 1971, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, pp. 787–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J.T. and Williams, F.: 1972, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, pp. 2930–2934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. a. Campion, A. and Wiliams, F.: 1972, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, pp. 7633–7637; b. Hudson, L., Shiotani, M., and Williams, F.: 1977, Chem. Phys. Lett. 48, pp. 193–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. a. Sprague, E.D.: 1973, J. Phys. Chem. 77, pp. 2066–2070; b. Neiss, M.A. and Willard, J.E.: 1975, J. Phys. Chem. 79, pp. 783–794; c. Neiss, M.A., Sprague, E.D., and Willard, J.E.: 1975, J. Chem. Phys. 63, pp. 1118–1121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LeRoy, R.J., Sprague, E.D., and Williams, F.: 1972, J. Phys. Chem. 76, pp. 546–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckart, C: 1930, Phys. Rev. 35, pp. 1303–1309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bell, R.P.: 1959, Trans. Faraday Soc. 54, pp. 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayscough, P.B., Collins, R.G., and Kemp, T.J.: 1966, J. Phys. Chem. 70, pp. 2220–2223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonin, M.A., Tsuji, K., and Williams F.: 1968, Nature (London) 218, pp. 946–948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wijnen, M.H.J.: 1954, J. Chem. Phys. 22, pp. 1074–1076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sargent, F.P., Bailey, M.G., and Gardy, E.M.: 1974, Can. J. Chem. 52, pp. 2171–2174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sprague, E.D., Takeda, K., Wang, J.T., and Williams, F.: 1974, Can. J. Chem. 52, pp. 2840–2844.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trotman-Dickenson, A.F. and Steacie, E.W.R.: 1951, J. Chem. Phys. 19, pp. 329–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Toryiama, K., Nunome, K., and Iwasaki, M.: 1977, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, pp. 5823–5824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. a. Toryiama, K. and Iwasaki, M.: 1978, J. Phys. Chem. 82, pp. 2056–2061; b. Iwasaki, M., Toryiama, K., Muto, H., and Nunome, K.: 1978, Chem. Phys. Lett. 56, pp. 494–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Timm, D. and Willard, J.E.: 1969, J. Phys. Chem. 73, pp. 2403–2408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aditya, S., Wilkey, D.D., Wang, H.Y., and Willard, J.E.: 1979, J. Phys. Chem. 83, pp. 599–605. See also: Wilkey, D.D. and Willard, J.E.: 1976, J. Chem. Phys. 64, pp. 3976–3977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. a. Brunton, G., Griller, D., Barclay, L.R.C., and Ingold, K.U.: 1976, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, pp. 6803–6811; b. Brunton, G., Gray, J.A., Griller, D., Barclay, L.R.C., and Ingold, K.U.: 1978, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, pp. 4197–4200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malatesta, V. and Ingold, K.U.: J. Am. Chem. Soc., submitted.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this paper

Cite this paper

Malatesta, V., Ingold, K.U., Chatgilialoglu, C. (1981). Quantum Mechanical Tunneling in Free Radical Reactions. In: Capellos, C., Walker, R.F. (eds) Fast Reactions in Energetic Systems. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8511-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8511-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8513-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8511-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation