Estratto
L’applicazione delle tecniche di elaborazione delle immagini allo studio dell’apparato digerente è piuttosto consolidata in molte situazioni cliniche. L’interesse verso tali tecniche nasce dall’uso ormai costante della tomografia computerizzata (TC), e piuttosto frequente della risonanza magnetica (RM) nella valutazione sia del tubo digerente, sia dei parenchimi come il fegato e il pancreas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Letture consigliate
Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:786–792
Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A et al (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:137–143
Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M et al (2000) Comparison of time-efficient ct colonography with two-and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1543–1549
Mang T, Schaefer-Prokop C, Schima W et al (2008) Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol [Epub ahead of print Jan 21]
Neri E, Vannozzi F, Vagli P, Bardine A, Bartolozzi C (2006) Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30:175–180
Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi CA, Napel S (2000) Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:179–188
Pickhardt PJ (2004) Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:429–436
Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456
Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Rückert JC et al (2005) Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236:184–188
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2004) CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025–1033
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A et al (2007) Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 244:316–317
Vos FM, Van Gelder RE, Serlie IWO et al (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: Conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228:878–885
**ong T, Richardson M, Woodroffe R et al (2005) Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency. Br J Radiol 78:22–29
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neri, E., Giusti, S., Cerri, F., Turini, F. (2008). Apparato digerente. In: Produrre ed elaborare immagini diagnostiche. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1064-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1064-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1063-5
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1064-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)