The Axes of a Majorana Representation of \(A_{12}\)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Groups of Exceptional Type, Coxeter Groups and Related Geometries

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 82))

  • 938 Accesses

Abstract

This paper contributes to an axiomatic approach (which goes under the name of Majorana theory) to the largest sporadic simple group \({\mathbf {M}}\), known as the Monster, and to its \(196,884\)-dimensional algebra \(V_{\mathbf {M}}\). We study the axiomatic version \(V\) of the subalgebra \(V_A\) of \(V_{\mathbf {M}}\) generated by the Majorana axes corresponding to the \(2A\)-involutions of an alternating subgroup \(A_{12}\) of \(\mathbf {M}\) whose centraliser is isomorphic to \(A_5\). Although the dimension of \(V^{(2A)}_A\), the linear span of the generating Majorana axes of \(V_A\), has been known for a while to be \(3498\), the dimension of \(V_A\) itself remains unknown. For each \(3 \le N \le 5\), let \(V^{(NA)}\) be the linear span of the \(NA\)-axes of \(V\). In this paper, we examine the space

$$\begin{aligned} V^{\circ } = \left\langle V^{(NA)} : 2 \le N \le 5 \right\rangle . \end{aligned}$$

We prove that \(V^{(2A)}\) contains the \(3A\)-axes corresponding to \(3\)-cycles in \(A_{12}\), but it does not contain any of those corresponding to products of two \(3\)-cycles. By considering a \(21\)-dimensional space determined by a \(2B\)-involution, we also show that no \(4A\)-axis of \(V\) belongs to \(V^{(2A)}\). An argument due to Á. Seress enables us to show further that any \(5A\)-axis of \(V\) is linearly expressible in terms of Majorana axes and \(3A\)-axes of \(V\). When \(V=V_A\), our results, enhanced by information about the characters of \({\mathbf {M}}\), allow us to deduce that

$$\begin{aligned} \left\langle V^{(2A)}_A, V^{(3A)}_A \right\rangle = \left\langle V^{(2A)}_A, V^{(4A)}_A \right\rangle = V^{\circ }_A, \end{aligned}$$

and that \(V^{\circ }_A\) is the the direct sum of \(V_A^{(2A)}\) and a \(462\)-dimensional irreducible \(\mathbb {R}A\)-module; hence, we conclude that \(\dim (V_A^{\circ }) = 3960\). The whole algebra \(V_A\) may still contain \(V_A^{\circ }\) properly, but its codimension is bounded by \(1191\).

A Castillo-Ramirez—Funded by the Universidad de Guadalajara and an Imperial College International Scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This number was independently approximated, with an error of \(8 \times 10^{-10}\), by Alexander Balikhin in his final year project –‘On a Majorana Representation of \(A_{12}\)’, Imperial College London, (2009). The error in Balikhin’s computation means that \(3498\) is the rank of a matrix that differs from \(M\) on each entry by at most \(8 \times 10^{-10}\).

References

  1. Conway, J.H., Curtis, R.T., Norton, S.P., Parker, R.A., Wilson, R.A.: Atlas of Finite Groups. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Decelle, S.: The \(L_{2}(11)\)-subalgebra of the monster algebra. J. Ars Math. Contemp. 7(1), 83–103 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. The GAP Group, Gap—Groups Algorithms and Programming, Version 4.4.12, http://www.gap-system.org (2008)

  4. Ivanov, A.A.: The Monster Group and Majorana Involutions. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 176. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ivanov, A.A., Pasechnik, D.V., Seress, Á., Shpectorov, S.: Majorana representations of the symmetric group of degree \(4\). J. Algebra 324, 2432–2463 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanov, A.A.: On Majorana representations of \(A_{6}\) and \(A_{7}\). Comm. Math. Phys. 307, 1–16 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanov, A.A.: Majorana representations of \(A_{6}\) involving \(3C\)-algebras. Bull. Math. Sci. 1, 356–378 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanov, A.A., Seress, Á.: Majorana representations of \(A_{5}\). Math. Z. 272, 269–295 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivanov, A.A., Shpectorov, S.: Majorana representations of \(L_{3}(2) \). Adv. Geom. 14, 717–738 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyamoto, M.: Griess algebras and conformal vectors in vertex operator algebras. J. Algebra 179, 523–548 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Norton, S.P.: ‘The uniqueness of the monster’, in finite simple groups, coming of age. In: McKay J. (ed.) Contemporary Mathematical, vol. 45, pp. 271–285, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norton, S.P.: ‘The monster algebra: some new formulae’, in moonshine, the monster and related topics, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 193, pp. 297–306. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pasechnik, D.: private communication (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakuma, S.: \(6\)-Transposition property of \(\tau \)-involutions of vertex operator algebras. Int. Math. Res. Not. rnm030, 19 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seress, Á.: private communication, 3 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seress, Á.: ‘Construction of \(2\)-closed \(M\)-representations’ in Proceedings ISAAC12, pp. 311–318. American Mathematical Society, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Castillo-Ramirez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Orthogonality Relations

Appendix: Orthogonality Relations

Let \(\left( G,T,V,\left( ,\right) ,\cdot ,\varphi ,\psi \right) \) be a Majorana representation. It follows directly from axiom M1 that eigenvectors of the adjoint transformation of a Majorana axis corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal. This fact may be used to obtain several inner product relations involving distinct \(3A\)- and \(4A\)-axes. This appendix is devoted to state some of these relations.

Let \(t,g,q,s,h\in T\) and suppose that the Norton-Sakuma algebras \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{g}\right\rangle \right\rangle \), \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{q}\right\rangle \right\rangle \), \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{s}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) and \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{h}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) have types \(2A\), \(2B\), \(3A\) and \(4A\), respectively. Let \(\rho _{1}:=ts\) and \(\rho _{2}:=th\), and define \(s_{i}:=t\rho _{1}^{i}\) and \(h_{i}:=t\rho _{2}^{i}\), for \(i\in \mathbb {Z}\). Table 2 describes some of the eigenvectors of the adjoint transformation of \(a_{t}\) contained in the previous algebras. These eigenvectors were obtained in [5].

Table 2 Eigenvectors of Norton-Sakuma algebras

We summarise in Table 3 some of the relations obtained using the orthogonality between the eigenvectors of Table 2. In Table 3, the expression of each entry equals to the inner product between the axes labeling the row and column.

Table 3 Inner product relations using Norton-Sakuma algebras
Table 4 Eigenvectors of \(a_{(ij)}\) in the \(S_{4}\)-algebra of shape \((2B,3A)\)

The following lemmas state further useful relations.

Lemma A.1

Consider the algebras \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{s}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) and \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{h}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) of types \(3A\) and \(4A\), respectively, as defined above. Then,

$$\begin{aligned} \left( a_{h_{2}},u_{\rho _{1}}\right)&=\frac{2^{6}}{3^{2}5}\left( a_{h_{2}},a_{s}\right) , \\ \left( v_{\rho _{2}},u_{\rho _{1}}\right)&=\frac{11}{2^{2}3^{3}}-2\left( a_{h},u_{\rho _{1}}\right) +\frac{2^{6}}{3^{3}}\left[ \left( a_{h},a_{s}+a_{s_{-1}}\right) +\frac{1}{5}\left( a_{h_{2}},a_{s}\right) \right] \!, \\ \left( v_{\rho _{2}},a_{s}\right)&=\frac{7}{2^{8}3}+\frac{3^{2}5}{2^{5}}\left( a_{h},u_{\rho _{1}}\right) +\frac{1}{3}\left[ \left( a_{h_{2}},a_{s}\right) -\left( a_{h},a_{s}+a_{s_{-1}}\right) \right] \!. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma A.2

Let \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{h}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) be the algebra of type \(4A\) defined above, and suppose that \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{h^{\prime }}\right\rangle \right\rangle \) is also an algebra of type \(4A\) with \(\rho _{2}^{\prime }:=th^{\prime }\) and \(h_{i}^{\prime }:=t\left( \rho _{2}^{\prime }\right) ^{i}\), \(i\in \mathbb {Z}\). Suppose that \(h_{2}=h_{2}^{\prime }\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} \left( v_{\rho _{2}},v_{\rho _{2}^{\prime }}\right) =\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2^{2}}{3}\left( v_{\rho _{2}},a_{h^{\prime }}\right) -2^{2}\left( a_{h},v_{\rho _{2}^{\prime }}\right) +\frac{2^{3}}{3}\left( a_{h}+a_{h_{-1}},a_{h^{\prime }}\right) \!. \end{aligned}$$

For future reference, Table 4 contains some eigenvectors of \(a_{(i,j)}\) in the \(S_4\)-algebra of shape \((2B,3A)\), using the notation of the basis introduced in Sect. 5 of [5].

Lemma A.3

Let \(t , (ij), (kl), (ik) \in T\). Suppose that

$$\begin{aligned} \left\langle \left\langle a_{t},a_{(ij)}\right\rangle \right\rangle \textit{ and } \left\langle \left\langle a_{(ij)},a_{(kl)},a_{(ik)}\right\rangle \right\rangle \end{aligned}$$

are a Norton-Sakuma algebra of type \(2A\) and an \(S_{4}\)-algebra of shape \(( 2B,3A )\), respectively. Then, we have that

$$\begin{aligned} ( a_{t}-a_{t \cdot (ij)},v_j ) = - \frac{2}{3}\left( a_{t} - a_{t \cdot (ij)},a_{(ik)}+a_{(il)}\right) +\frac{3\cdot 5}{2^{4}}\left( a_{t}-a_{t \cdot (ij)},u_i\right) , \end{aligned}$$

where \(v_j\) is the \(4A\)-axis corresponding to \((i,k,j,l)\), and \(u_i\) is the \(3A\)-axis corresponding to \((j,k,l)\).

Proof

The result follows by the orthogonality between the first \(0\)-eigenvector of \(a_{(i,j)}\) given in Table 4 and the \(\frac{1}{4}\)-eigenvector of \(a_{(ij)}\) in \(\left\langle \left\langle a_{(ij)},a_{(kl)},a_{(ik)}\right\rangle \right\rangle \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castillo-Ramirez, A., Ivanov, A.A. (2014). The Axes of a Majorana Representation of \(A_{12}\) . In: Sastry, N. (eds) Groups of Exceptional Type, Coxeter Groups and Related Geometries. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 82. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1814-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation