Effect of Boundary Slippage on Foul Release

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Antifouling Surfaces and Materials
  • 2053 Accesses

Abstract

Boundary slippages occur on shearless solid surfaces. This property is related to fluid and solid surface properties. The special boundary condition provides a high flow velocity at the liquid–solid interface, which renders drag reduction characteristic and less foul adhesion at the surface. The chemical composition and microstructure of the surface determine the slippage property. For instance, the super-hydrophobic surface bio-mimicking of a lotus leaf is attributed to the micro-nanostructures and low-surface-energy materials in this plant. A steady air shield exists between the fluid flow and the super-hydrophobic surface. This air isolates the contact between the fluid and the surface. This behavior causes boundary slippage and foul release. Another case is the riblet-surface bio-mimicking of a sharkskin, which possesses a number of microgrooves. The surface not only stabilizes fluid flow at the interface that causes drag reduction but also prevents the breed of organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kline SJ, Reyolds WC, Schraub FA, Runstadlers PW (1967) The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 30:741–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinogradova OI (1995) Drainage of a thin liquid film confined between hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 11:2213–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi CH, Kim CJ (2006) Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. Phys Rev Lett 96:066001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Joly L, Biben T (2009) Wetting and friction on surperolephobic surface. Soft Mater 5:2549–2257

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu Y, Cai M, Li Z, Song X, Wang H, Pei X, Zhou F (2014) Slip flow of diverse liquids on robust superomniphobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 414:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L (2007) Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys Fluids 19:123601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee C, Choi CH, Kim CJ (2008) Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip. Phys Rev Lett 101:064501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee C, Kim CJ (2009) Maximizing the giant liquid slip on superhydrophobic microstructures by nanostructuring their sidewalls. Langmuir 25:12812–12818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu Y, Xue Y, Pei X, Cai M, Duan H, Huck WTS, Zhou F, Xue Q (2014) Adhesion-regulated switchable fluid slippage on super-hydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 118:2564–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Y, Liu Z, Liang Y, Pei X, Zhou F, Xue Q (2014) Switching fluid slippage on pH-responsive superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 22:6463–6468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Y, Liu Z, Liang Y, Pei X, Zhou F, Xue Q (2014) Photoresponsive superhydrophobic coating for regulating boundary slippage. Soft Matter. doi:10.1039/C4SM00799A

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu W, Wang X, Wang D (2009) Alumina nanowire forests via unconventional anodization and super-repellency plus low adhesion to diverse liquids. Chem Commun (Camb) 1043–1045

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu X, Wu W, Wang X, Luo Z, Liang Y, Zhou F (2009) A replication strategy for complex micronanostructures with superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity and high contrast adhesion. Soft Matter 5:3097–3105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Wang X, Liu X, Zhou F (2010) Engineering a titanium surface with controllable oleophobicity and switchable oil adhesion. J Phys Chem C 114:9938–9944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan S, Kota AK, Mabry JM, Tuteja A (2013) Superomniphobic surfaces for effective chemical shielding. J Am Chem Soc 135:578–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu K, Jiang L (2012) Bio-inspired self-cleaning surfaces. Ann Rev Mat Res 42:231–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marmur A (2006) Super-hydrophobicity fundamentals: implications to biofouling prevention. Biofouling 22:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang H, Lamb R, Lewis J (2005) Engineering nanoscale roughness on hydrophobic surface—preliminary assessment of fouling behaviour. Sci Technol Adv Mat 6:236–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong TS, Kang SH, Tang SK, Smythe EJ, Hatton BD, Grinthal A, Aizenberg J (2011) Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 477:443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Epsteina AK, Wong T-S, Belisle RA, Boggsa EM, Aizenberg J (2012) Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional anti-biofouling performance. PANS 109:13182–13187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson PW, Lu W, Xu H, Kim P, Kreder MJ, Alvarenga J, Aizenberg J (2013) Inhibition of ice nucleation by slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS). Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim P, Wong T, Alvarenga J, Kreder MJ, Adorno-Martinez WE, Aizenberg J (2012) Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano 6:6569–6577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Magin CM, Cooper SP, Brennan AB (2010) Non-toxic antifouling strategies. Mater Today 13:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bixler GD, Bhushan B (2013) Fluid drag reduction with shark-skin riblet inspired microstructured surfaces. Adv Func Mater 23:4507–4528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Walsh MJ (1983) Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. AIAA J 21:485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nitschke P (1983) Experimental investigation of the turbulent flow in smooth and longitudinal grooved tubes. AIAA J, NAS 1.15:77480

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bechert DW, Bartenwerfer M (1989) The viscous-flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J Fluid Mech 206:105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W, Vanderhoeven JGT, Hoppe G (1997) Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech 338:59–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee SJ, Lee SH (2001) Flow field analysis of a turbulent boundary layer over a riblet surface. Exp Fluids 30:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W (2000) Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Exp Fluids 87:157–171

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW, Schumacher JF Wilkerson W, Wilson LH, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brennan AB (2006) Engineered antifouling microtopographies—correlating wettability with cell attachment. Biofouling 22:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bers AV, Wahl M (2004) The influence of natural surface microtopographies on fouling. Biofouling 20:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Long CJ, Schumacher Robinson PAC, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brennan AB (2010) A model that predicts the attachment behavior of Ulva linzazoospores on surface topography. Biofouling 26:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Efimenko K, Finlay J, Callow ME, Callow JA, Genzer J (2009) Development and testing of hierarchically wrinkled coatings for marine antifouling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1031–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schumacher JF, Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW, Wilson LH, Callow ME, Callow JA, Finlay JA, Brennan AB (2007) Engineered antifouling microtopographies—effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva. Biofouling 23:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schumacher JF, Aldred N, Callow ME, Finlay J A, Callow JA, Clare AS, Brennan AB (2007) Species-specific engineered antifouling topographies: correlations between the settlement of algal zoospores and barnacle cyprids. Biofouling 23:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Virk PS, Merrill EW, Mickley HS, Smith KA (1967) The Toms phenomenon: turbulent pipe flow of dilute polymer solutions. J Fluid Mech 30:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. White CM, Mungal MG (2008) Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318:426–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dalsin JL, Messersmith PB (2005) Bioinspired antifouling polymers. Mater Today 8:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang F, Liu S, Zhang Y, Chi Z, Xua J, Wei Y (2012) A facile approach to surface modification on versatile substrates for biological applications. J Mater Chem 22:17159–17166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fan XW, Lin LJ, Dalsin JL, Messersmith PB (2005) Biomimetic anchor for surface-initiated polymerization from metal substrates, J Am Chem Soc 127:15843–15847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hay ME (1996) Marine chemical ecology: what's known and what's next? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:103–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu M, Wang S, Wei Z, Song Y, Jiang L (2009) Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and low adhesive water/solid interface. Adv Mater 21:665–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin L, Liu M, Chen L, Chen P, Ma J, Han D, Jiang L (2010) Bio-inspired hierarchical macromolecule-nanoclay hydrogels for robust underwater superoleophobicity. Adv Mater 22:4826–4830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xue ZX, Wang ST, Lin L, Chen L, Liu M, Feng L, Jiang L (2011) A novel superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic hydrogel-coated mesh for oil/water separation. Adv Mater 23:4270–4273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Feng L, Zhang Z, Mai Z, Ma Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D (2004) A superhydrophobic and superoleophilic coating mesh film for the separation of oil and water. Angew Chem Int Edit 43:2012–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, F. (2015). Effect of Boundary Slippage on Foul Release. In: Zhou, F. (eds) Antifouling Surfaces and Materials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45204-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation