How Physiological and Pathophysiological Factors Influence the Pharmacokinetics and Analgesic Effect of Opiates in Cancer Patients

  • Conference paper
Drug Delivery in Cancer Treatment

Part of the book series: ESO Monographs ((ESO MONOGRAPHS))

Abstract

In order to apply optimal drug delivery to a cancer patient, the fundamental principles of drug kinetics and dynamics should be followed. It is also important to understand how different physiological factors can influence the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs and consequently their effects, e.g., the analgesic effect of opiates. Some basic pharmacokinetic principles will therefore be repeated first in this chapter (for a review see Rowland & Tozer [1]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowland M and Tozer TN: Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Säwe J: High-dose morphine and methadone in cancer patients. Clinic Pharmacokin 1986 (11):87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patwardhan RV, Johnsson RF, Hoyumpa A, Sheehan JJ, Desmond PV, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA and Schenker S: Normal metabolism of morphine in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1981 (81):1006–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Säwe J, Dahlström B, Paalzow L and Rane A: Morphine kinetics in cancer patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981 (30):629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neal EA, Meffin PJ, Gregory PB and Blaschke TF: Enhanced bioavailability and decreased clearance of analgesics in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1979 (77):96–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laidlaw J, Read AE and Sherlock S: Morphine tolerance in hepatic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1961 (40):389–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellville JW,Forrest WH and Miller E: Influence of age on pain relief from analgesics. JAMA 1971 (217):1835–1841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaiko RF, Wallenstein SL, Rogers AG, Grabinski PY and Houde RW: Clinical analgesic studies and sources of variation in analgesic responses to morphine. In: Foley KM and Inturrisi CE (eds) Advances in Pain Research and Rherapy. New York: Raven Press 1986 pp 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berkowitz BA, Ngai SH, Yang JC, Hempstead J and Spector S: The disposition of morphine in surgical patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975 (17):629–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen JA, Sitar DS, Berger L, Brownell L, Duke PC and Mitenko PA :Age-related morphine kinetics in cancer patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983 (34):364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh TD, Grabinski PY and Kaiko RF: Clinical implications of morphine plasma levels in advanced cancer. In: Foley KM and Inturrisi CE (eds) Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. New York: Raven Press 1986 pp 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  12. Szeto HH, Inturrisi CE, Houde RW,Saal S, Cheig J and Reidenberg MM: Accumulation of normeperidine, an active metabolite of meperidine, in patients with renal failure or cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977 (86):738–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Don HF, Dieppa RA and Taylor P: Narcotic analgesics in anuric patients. Anesthesiology 1975 (42):745–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen GD: Methadone binding to human plasma proteins. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1973 (14):338–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards DJ, Svensson CK, Visco JP and Lalka D: Clinical pharmacokinetics of pethidine (meperidine). Clin Pharmacokinet 1982 (7):421–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abramson F: Methadone plasma protein binding alterations in cancer and displacement from alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982 (32):652–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabrielsson JL: Modeling of drugs in pregnacy.The application of pharmacokinetic principles and physiological flow models. Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University 1985

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dahlström B and Paalzow LK: Pharmacokinetic interpretation of enterohepatic recirculation and first-pass elimination of morphine in the rat. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1978 (6):505–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iwamoto K and Klassen CD: First-pass effect of morphine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1977 (200):236–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson MI: Clinical pharmacokinetics of methadone. Ph.D. thesis, University of Uppsala 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott JC and Stanski DR: Decreased fentanyl and alfentanyl dose requirements with age. A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987 (240):159–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tamsen A: Patient-controlled analgesic therapy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Uppsala 1981

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paalzow LK, Paalzow GHM and Tfelt-Hansen P: Kinetics of drug action. In: Benet LZ, Levy G and Ferraiolo BL (eds) Pharmacokinetics. New York: Plenum 1984 pp 327–343

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paalzow, L.K. (1987). How Physiological and Pathophysiological Factors Influence the Pharmacokinetics and Analgesic Effect of Opiates in Cancer Patients. In: Domellöf, L. (eds) Drug Delivery in Cancer Treatment. ESO Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73077-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73077-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73079-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73077-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation