Abstract
Single-worker households (and one worker’s commuting trade-offs) populate the world of urban economic theory. Alonso (1964) elaborated the locational choices facing “an individual”; it made no difference if that individual was a member of a multi-worker household because all individual workers would commute to the same city center. More complex models (e.g. White, 1977) assume two work sites (the CBD and a “suburban ring”) with all females commuting to the nearby suburban ring. Women’s worktrip times would tend to be longer if by transit (their value of time is less than that of men) but shorter if by private automobile (because they generally earn less, and here they tend to economize on the monetary costs of commuting). Alonso (1980) wrote about the rise of the two-worker household in the U.S. and speculated that, “… when there are several commuters rather than only one per household, and when non-working time is more valuable, … locational factors may play a stronger role, …. this factor may result in more concentrated development to reduce travel time. The most convenient point to two distant suburban work places may in many cases be a location more near the center.” (Alonso, 1980, p. 550). This view is challenged by Giuliano (1989) and Giuliano and Small (1993). Empirically, although the proportion of multi-worker households continues to expand, more concentrated development has not occurred.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, W. (1980), ‘The population factor and urban structure’, in Solomon, A. (ed.), The Prospective City, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Alonso, W. (1964), Location and Land Use, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Forstall, R.L. (1994), Memorandum of January 6, 1994, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
Giuliano, G. (1989), ‘Research policy and review: New directions for understanding transportation and land use’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 21, pp. 145–159.
Giuliano, G. and Small, K. (1993), ‘Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?’, Urban Studies, vol. 30, pp. 1485–1500.
Gordon, P. and Moore II, J.E. (1989), ‘Endogenizing the rise and fall of urban subcenters via discrete programming models’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 21, pp. 1195–1203.
Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (1994), Geographic Factors Explaining Worktrip Length Changes, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Gordon, P., Richardson, H.W. and Kumar, A. (1989), ‘Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior’, Regional Studies, vol. 23, pp. 499–510.
Gordon, P., Richardson, H.W. and Kumar, A. (1988), ‘Beyond the journey to work’, Transportation Research A, vol. 22, pp. 419–426.
Hu, P.S. and Young, J. (1993), ‘1990 NPTS databook: Nationwide personal transportation survey’, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Kitamura, R. and Kostyniuk, L.P. (1986), ‘Maturing motorization and household travel: The case of nuclear-family households’, Transportation Research A, vol. 20, pp. 245–260.
Liao, Y. (1993), ‘Trip chaining in urban travel’, Paper presented at University of Southern California, Urban Economics Group Seminar.
Madden, J. (1981), ‘Why women work closer to home’, Urban Studies, vol. 18, pp. 181–194.
Mills, E.S. (1998), ‘Excess commuting in U.S. metropolitan areas’, Chapter 4, this volume.
Richardson, H.W. (1988), ‘Monocentric vs. polycentric models: The future of urban economics in regional science’, Annals of Regional Science, vol. 22, pp. 1–12.
Richardson, H.W., Gordon, P. and Choi, Y. (1992), ‘Tests of the standard urban model: A micro (trade-off) alternative’, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, vol. 4, pp. 50–66.
Tkocz, Z. and Kristensen, G. (1994), ‘Commuting distances and genders: A spatial urban model’, Geographical Analysis, vol. 26, pp. 1–14.
White, M.J. (1977), ‘A model of residential location choice and commuting by men and women workers’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 17, pp. 41–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gordon, P., Liao, Yc., Richardson, H. (1998). Household Commuting: Implications of the Behavior of Two-Worker Households for Land- Use/Transportation Models. In: Lundqvist, L., Mattsson, LG., Kim, T.J. (eds) Network Infrastructure and the Urban Environment. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72242-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72242-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72244-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72242-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive