Intelligibility, Vocal Intensity, and Long-Term Average Spectra of Groningen Button-Oesophageal Speech

  • Conference paper
Speech Restoration Via Voice Prostheses

Abstract

Most, if not all, of my colleagues who have any experience of tracheo-esophageal fistula speech production, agree that this type of voice production is louder, more fluent, and more intelligible than other methods of speech production available to laryngectomees. This widely held opinion is primarily based on subjective observations and cannot evaluate the voice qualities of the different voice production types objectively. We all think that tracheo-oesophageal fistula voice production, or button-assisted oesophageal speech as we prefer to call it, is superior to conventional oesophageal speech. Little or no effort, however, has been made to research effectively the differences between the various voice production methods by measuring such parameters as volume, intelligibility, and fluency. If we want to compare speech quality results, it is essential to use standardized measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gates GA et al. (1982) Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation. I Results of therapy. Am J Otolaryngology 3:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer SD, Johns DF (1982) Attaining functional esophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol 108:647–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte HK et al. (1985) Evaluation of speech with and without a “Groningen type” voice button. In: Speech Restoration via Voice Prosthesis. Int. Workshop, June 1984, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mahieu, H.F., Schutte, H.K., Annyas, A.A. (1986). Intelligibility, Vocal Intensity, and Long-Term Average Spectra of Groningen Button-Oesophageal Speech. In: Herrmann, I.F. (eds) Speech Restoration Via Voice Prostheses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71415-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71415-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-71417-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-71415-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation