Abstract

The rehabilitation patients of this decade and of the future are taking on a very distinct profile for being at risk for decubitus ulcer development. Patients admitted to an acute, comprehensive rehabilitation program are typically only a few days to a few weeks post onset of their disability, trauma, or surgical intervention. It is not uncommon for the needs of these patients to be complex, as well as for them to be medically unstable. Even more common is the rehabilitation patient who has not been fully mobilized and requires high technological intervention, including ventilator management, total parenteral nutrition, and multiple parenteral chemotherapeutic regimens, coupled with other intensive therapies throughout their comprehensive rehabilitation program. This new profile of the rehabilitation patient aggravates their “at risk” status for the development of decubitus ulcers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
EUR 9.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller H, Delozier J (1994) Cost implications of the pressure ulcer treatment guideline. Columbia, MD: center for health policy studies, 1994. Sponsored by Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Contract no 282-91-0070

    Google Scholar 

  2. Young J, Burns P (1981) Pressure sores and the spinal cord injured. Model Syst SCI Dig 3(PTI):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteneck G, Carter R, Charlifue S et al. (1985) A collaborative study of high quadriplegia. (Rocky Mountain Regional Spinal Cord Injury System, Northern California Regional Spinal Injury System and Texas Regional Spinal Cord Injury System). Craig Hospital, Englewood CO

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooney T, Reuler J (1984) Pressure sores: topics in primary care medicine. West J Med 140:622–624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. LaMantia J, Hirschwald J, Goodman et al. (1987) A program design to reduce chronic readmission for pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs 12:22–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Woodbury B, Redd C (1987) Psychosocial issues and approaches. In: Buchanan L, Nawoczenski (eds) Spinal cord injury: concepts and management approaches. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 185–218

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kosiak M (1961) Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 42:19–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindan O (1961) Etiology of decubitus ulcers: an experimental study. Decubitus ulcer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 774–783

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maklebust J, Mondoux L, Sieggreen M (1986) Pressure relief characteristics of various support surfaces used in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. J Enterostom Ther 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  10. Staas W, LaMantia J (1983) Rehabilitation approach. In: Parish L, Witkowski J, Crissey J (eds) The decubitus ulcer, Chap 9. Masson, New York, pp 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson J, Price S, Brandstater M, Mandac B (1994) Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:535–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson A, Malassigne P, Murray J (1994) Comparison of seat pressures on three bowel care/shower chairs in spinal cord injury. SCI Nurs 11:105–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patterson R, Cranmer H, Fisher SV, Engel R (1993) The impaired response of spinal cord injured individuals to repeated surface pressure loads. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:947–953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter C, Rodheaver G (1990) Interventions: hemostasis, cleansing, topical antibiotics, debridement, and closure. In: Wound care manual. Convatec: a Squibb Company, Princeton, pp 71–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chapius A, Dolfus P (1990) The use of a calcium alginate dressing the management of decubitus ulcers in patients with spinal cord lesions. Paraplegia 28:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frylling C (1989) Comprehensive wound management with topical growth factors. Ostomy/Wound Care Management, 36:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson T, Andberg M (1979) Psychosocial factors associated with pressure sores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60:341–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Staas W, Cioschi H (1991) Rehabilitation medicine — adding life to years. Pressure sores — a multifaceted approach to prevention and treatment. West J Med 154:539–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petro J (1990) Ethical dilemmas of pressure sores. Decubitus 3(2):28–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Staas, W.E., Cioschi, H.M., Jacobs, B. (1997). Rehabilitation Approach. In: Parish, L.C., Witkowski, J.A., Crissey, J.T. (eds) The Decubitus Ulcer in Clinical Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60509-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60509-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64436-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60509-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation