Abstract
This study examined the impact of two different designs of online discussion on student participation in the discussions and the type of learning that was generated. The results showed that when students were given an opportunity to respond to each other with the instructor mostly absent in the discussion process until the end of the discussions, they would visit the discussion forums more frequently. They were also more likely to pose follow-up questions for their classmates and engage in meaningful inquires. On the other hand, when the instructor posted frequently in the discussion forums, students would respond to him instead of their peers, and the discussions were seldom carried forth in much depth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gold, S.: A Constructivist Approach to Online Training for Online Teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1), 35–57 (2001)
Li, Q.: Knowledge Building Community: Keys for Using Online Forums. Tech. Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 48(4), 24–28 (2004)
Berge, Z.L.: Active, Interactive, and Reflective Elearning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 3(2), 181–190 (2002)
Hemetsberger, A., Reinhardt, C.: Learning and Knowledge-Building in Open-Source Communities: a Social-Experiential Approach. Management Learning 37(2), 187–214 (2006)
Dennen, V.P., Wieland, K.: From Interaction to Intersubjectivity: Facilitating Online Group Discourse Processes. Distance Education 28(3), 281–297 (2007)
Baglione, S.L., Nastanski, M.: The Superiority of Online Discussion: Faculty Perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 82(2), 139–150 (2007)
Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., Stephenson, H.: Asynchronous Online Discussions as a Tool for Learning: Students’ Attitudes, Expectations, and Perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 16(4), 409–430 (2005)
Bruyan, L.L.: Monitoring online communication: Can the Development of Convergence and Social Presence Indicate an Interactive Learning Environment? Distance Education 25(1), 67–81 (2004)
Dennen, V.P.: From Message Posting to Learning Dialogues: Factors Affecting Learner Participation in Asynchronous Discussion. Distance Education 26(1), 127–148 (2005)
Guldberg, K., Pilkington, R.: Tutor Roles in Facilitating Reflection on Practice through Online Discussion. Educational Technology & Society 10(1), 61–72 (2007)
Mazzolini, M., Maddison, S.: When to Jump in: The Role of the Instructor in Online Discussion Forums. Computers & Education 49, 193–213 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yao, Y. (2008). Comparing the Impact of Two Different Designs for Online Discussion. In: Li, F., Zhao, J., Shih, T.K., Lau, R., Li, Q., McLeod, D. (eds) Advances in Web Based Learning - ICWL 2008. ICWL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5145. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85032-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85033-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)