Abstract
Traffic flow theory is devoted to study the interactions between vehicles (or drivers) and the infrastructure, which is given by many components, such as the roadways, the road signs and the traffic control actuators. Traffic phenomena are very complex, since they depend on the interactions of a large number of inhomogeneous vehicles and on many external factors. The first attempts to develop a mathematical theory of traffic flow date back to about one century ago, and the technology advancement of the last decades (in computer processing capabilities, as well as in measurement devices) has further enabled the evolution of traffic flow theory. Nevertheless, the research in traffic flow modelling is still very active and different types of traffic models are nowadays available, both based on theoretical approaches and on empirical observations. Such models can be used by traffic managers to forecast traffic conditions, and consequently to properly inform users about the forthcoming traffic state they can encounter in their travel, or to adequately design the traffic control frameworks to be applied in freeway networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Greenshields BD, Bibbins JR, Channing WS, Miller HH (1935) A study of traffic capacity. Highw Res Board 14:448–477
Greenberg H (1959) An analysis of traffic flow. Oper Res 7:79–85
Underwood RT (1961) Speed, volume and density relationships: quality and theory of traffic flow. Yale Bureau of Highway Traffic, Connecticut, pp 141–188
Newell GF (1961) Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Oper Res 9:209–229
Drake JS, Schofer JL, May AD (1967) A statistical analysis of speed-density hypotheses in vehicular traffic science. Highw Res Rec Proc 154:112–117
Chiabaut N, Buisson C, Leclercq L (2009) Fundamental diagram estimation through passing rate measurements in congestion. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 10:355–359
Ji Y, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S, Hoogendoorn-Lanser S, Qian X (2010) Investigating the shape of the macroscopic fundamental diagram using simulation data. Transp Res Rec 2161:40–48
Wang H, Li J, Chen QY, Ni D (2011) Logistic modeling of the equilibrium speed-density relationship. Transp Res Part A 45:554–566
Carey M, Bowers M (2012) A review of properties of flow-density functions. Transp Rev 32:49–73
Newell GF (1962) Theories of instability in dense highway traffic. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 5:9–54
Zhang HM (1999) A mathematical theory of traffic hysteresis. Transp Res Part B 33:1–23
Laval JA (2011) Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: an improved measurement method. Transp Res Part B 45:385–391
Kerner BS (2004) The physics of traffic. Springer, Heidelberg
Kerner BS (2004) Three-phase traffic theory and highway capacity. Phys A 333:379–440
Schönhof M, Helbing D (2009) Criticism of three-phase traffic theory. Transp Res Part B 43:784–797
Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2010) Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts. Transp Res Part B 44:983–1000
Banks JH (1990) Flow processes at a freeway bottleneck. Transp Res Rec 1287:20–28
Cassidy MJ, Bertini RL (1999) Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transp Res Part B 33:25–42
Geroliminis N, Daganzo CF (2008) Existence of Urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: some experimental findings. Transp Res Part B 42:759–770
Geroliminis N, Sun J (2011) Properties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic. Transp Res Part B 45:605–617
Geroliminis N, Sun J (2011) Hysteresis phenomena of a macroscopic fundamental diagram in freeway networks. Transp Res Part A 45:966–979
Gayah VV, Daganzo CF (2011) Clockwise hysteresis loops in the macroscopic fundamental diagram: an effect of network instability. Transp Res Part B 45:643–655
Elefteriadou L (2014) An introduction to traffic flow theory. Springer, Berlin
HCM 2010 - Highway capacity manual. Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C., 2010
Elefteriadou L (2003) Defining, measuring and estimating freeway capacity. In: Proceedings of the 82nd annual meeting of the transportation research board
Lorenz M, Elefteriadou L (2000) A probabilistic approach to defining freeway capacity and breakdown. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on highway capacity, pp 84–95
Shiomi Y, Yoshii T, Kitamura R (2011) Platoon-based traffic flow model for estimating breakdown probability at single-lane expressway bottlenecks. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 17:591–610
Zhang L, Levinson D (2010) Ramp metering and freeway bottleneck capacity. Transp Res Part A 44:218–235
Daganzo CF (1997) Fundamentals of transportation and traffic operations. Elsevier Science New York
Bertini RL, Leal MT (2005) Empirical study of traffic features at a freeway lane drop. J Transp Eng 131:397–407
May AD (1990) Traffic flow fundamentals. Prenctice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Oper Res 4:42–51
Sugiyama Y, Fukui M, Kikuchi M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Nishinari K, Tadaki S-I, Yukawa S (2008) Traffic jams without bottlenecks - experimental evidence for the physical mechanism of the formation of a jam. New J Phys 10:033001
Stern RE, Cui S, Delle Monache ML, Bhadani R, Bunting M, Churchill M, Hamilton N, Haulcy R, Pohlmann H, Wu F, Piccoli B, Seibold B, Sprinkle J, Work DB (2017) Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: field experiments. ar**v:1705.01693
Cassidy MJ, Ahn S (1934) Driver turn-taking behavior in congested freeway merges. Transp Res Rec 2005:140–147
Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2006) Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. Phys Rev E 74:1–10
Banks JH (1991) The two-capacity phenomenon: some theoretical issues. Transp Res Rec 1320:234–241
Hall F-L, Agyemang-Duah K (1991) Freeway capacity drop and the definition of capacity. Transp Res Rec 1320:91–98
Chung K, Rudjanakanoknad J, Cassidy MJ (2007) Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks. Transp Res Part B 41:82–95
Banks JH (1990) The two-capacity phenomenon at freeway bottlenecks: a basis for ramp metering? Transp Res Rec 1320:83–90
Srivastava A, Geroliminis N (2013) Empirical observations of capacity drop in freeway merges with ramp control and integration in a first-order model. Transp Res Part C 30:161–177
Laval JA (1988) Stochastic processes of moving bottlenecks: approximate formulas for highway capacity. Transp Res Rec 2006:86–91
Leclercq L, Laval JA, Chiabaut N (2011) Capacity drops at merges: an endogenous model. Transp Res Part B 45:1302–1313
Leclercq L, Laval JA, Chiabaut N (2016) Capacity drops at merges: new analytical investigations. Transp Res Part C 62:171–181
Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves II: a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc Royal Soc A 229:317–345
Hoogendoorn SP, Bovy PHL (2001) State-of-the-art of vehicular traffic flow modelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng 215:283–303
van Wageningen-Kessels F, van Lint H, Vuik K, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Genealogy of traffic flow models. EURO J Transp Logist 4:445–473
Papageorgiou M (1998) Some remarks on macroscopic traffic flow modelling. Transp Res Part A 32:323–329
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferrara, A., Sacone, S., Siri, S. (2018). Fundamentals of Traffic Dynamics. In: Freeway Traffic Modelling and Control. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75961-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75961-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75959-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75961-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)