Adaptive Three-Stage Clinical Trial Design for a Binary Endpoint in the Rare Disease Setting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pharmaceutical Statistics (MBSW 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 218))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in develo** therapeutic agents for rare diseases is the limited number of eligible patients. A conventional randomized clinical trial may not be adequately powered if the sample size is small and asymptotic assumptions needed to apply common test statistics are violated. This paper proposes an adaptive three-stage clinical trial design for a binary endpoint in the rare disease setting. It presents an exact unconditional test statistic to generally control Type I error when sample size is small while not sacrificing power. Adaptive randomization has the potential to increase power by allocating greater numbers of patients to a more effective treatment. Performance of the method is illustrated using simulation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 158.24
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission: Useful information on rare diseases from an EU perspective. Accessed 19 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Piantadosi, S.: Cross-over designs. In: Clinical Trials, A Methodologic Perspective. Wiley, Toronto (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guyatt, G.H., Heyting, A., Jaeschke, R., Keller, J., Adachi, J.D., Roberts, R.S.: N of 1 randomized trials for investigating new drugs. Control. Clin. Trials 11(2), 88–100 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Temple, R.J.: Special study designs: early escape, enrichment, studies in non-responders. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 23(2), 499–530 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Temple, R.J.: Problems in interpreting active control equivalence trials. Account. Res. 4(3–4), 267–275 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberger, W.: Randomized play-the-winner clinical trials: review and recommendations. Control. Clin. Trials 20, 328–342 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, J.D.: Error in the normal approximation to the t distribution. https://www.johndcook.com/blog/normal_approx_to_t/. Accessed 18 Jan 2017

  8. Rao, C.R.: Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. Wiley, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Honkanen, V.E., Siegel, A.F., Szalai, J.P., Berger, V., Feldman, B.M., Siegel, J.N.: A three-stage clinical trial design for rare disorders. Stat. Med. 20, 3009–3021 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, J.D., Nadarajah, S.: Stochastic inequality probabilities for adaptively randomized clinical trials. Biom. J. 48, 356–365 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wathen, J.K., Cook, J.D.: Power and bias in adaptively randomized clinical trials. Technical Report UTMDABTR-002-06. Accessed 7 Mar 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lydersen, S., Fagerland, M.W., Laake, P.: Recommended tests for association in \(2 \times 2\) tables. Stat. Med. 28, 1159–1175 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger, R.L., Boos, D.D.: P values maximized over a confidence set for the nuisance parameter. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 1012–1016 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehrotra, D.V., Chan, I.S., Berger, R.L.: A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions. Biometrics 59, 441–450 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer, P., Kohne, K.: Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics 50, 1029–1041 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stouffer, S.A., Lumsdaine, A.A., Lumsdaine, M.H., Williams, R.M., Smith, M.B., Janis, I.L., Star, S.A., Cottrell, L.S.: The American soldier: combat and its aftermath. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II., vol. 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abelson, R.P.: Statistics as Principled Argument. Psychology Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berger, R.L., Boos, D.D.: P values maximized over a confidence set for the nuisance parameter. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89(427), 1012–1016 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeffreys, H.: An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, pp. 453–461 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaowei Hua .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gan, L., Hua, Z. (2019). Adaptive Three-Stage Clinical Trial Design for a Binary Endpoint in the Rare Disease Setting. In: Liu, R., Tsong, Y. (eds) Pharmaceutical Statistics. MBSW 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67386-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation